BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

301 results for “section 68”+ Section 10(23)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,370Mumbai4,408Bangalore1,583Chennai1,104Ahmedabad1,031Kolkata952Jaipur879Hyderabad762Karnataka698Pune581Surat494Chandigarh479Indore453Cochin301Raipur263Visakhapatnam223Rajkot193Cuttack150Agra144Amritsar136Nagpur130Telangana117Guwahati111Lucknow111SC82Ranchi81Jabalpur74Calcutta70Jodhpur64Allahabad64Patna57Panaji38Dehradun26Varanasi21Orissa11Rajasthan9Kerala9Gauhati3Uttarakhand3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Punjab & Haryana1Himachal Pradesh1Andhra Pradesh1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Tripura1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1

Key Topics

Section 25076Section 153A32Addition to Income32Section 143(3)29Section 14A22Limitation/Time-bar19Section 13210Section 689Disallowance9Section 36

THE TRIVANDRUM EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO. 43,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

ITA 863/COCH/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, CA
Section 115BSection 144BSection 250Section 40A(3)Section 68Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

23 24/1055332576(1) Heard both parties at length. Case files perused. 2. The assessee’s former appeal ITA.No.792/Coch./2023 pleads the following substantive grounds : “1) The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in his finding that no notice as mandated u/s 144B(XI) is required for completion of the assessment. 2) The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals

Showing 1–20 of 301 · Page 1 of 16

...
8
Section 201(1)8
Unexplained Investment6

THE TRIVANDRUM EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO. 43,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ADDITIONAL JOINT DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOCHI

ITA 792/COCH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, CA
Section 115BSection 144BSection 250Section 40A(3)Section 68Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

23 24/1055332576(1) Heard both parties at length. Case files perused. 2. The assessee’s former appeal ITA.No.792/Coch./2023 pleads the following substantive grounds : “1) The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in his finding that no notice as mandated u/s 144B(XI) is required for completion of the assessment. 2) The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. M/S.THOMSON AGENCIES, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 314/COCH/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Apr 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri. Sathish John Kanichai, FCA
Section 132Section 153ASection 68

23-05-2005 12000 P.T.Benny 24-05-2005 11000 P.T.Davis 25-05-2005 12000 P.T.Varghese 09-08-2005 15000 Gracy Thomas 09-08-2005 12000 Reeny Johnson 09-08-2005 15000 P.T.Benny 09-08-2005 8000 P.T.Davis 09-08-2005 15000 P.T.Varghese 27-10-2005 20000 Gracy Thomas 27-10-2005 20000 Reeny Johnson 27-10-2005 20000 P.T.Benny

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. M/S.THOMSON AGENCIES, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 310/COCH/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Apr 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri. Sathish John Kanichai, FCA
Section 132Section 153ASection 68

23-05-2005 12000 P.T.Benny 24-05-2005 11000 P.T.Davis 25-05-2005 12000 P.T.Varghese 09-08-2005 15000 Gracy Thomas 09-08-2005 12000 Reeny Johnson 09-08-2005 15000 P.T.Benny 09-08-2005 8000 P.T.Davis 09-08-2005 15000 P.T.Varghese 27-10-2005 20000 Gracy Thomas 27-10-2005 20000 Reeny Johnson 27-10-2005 20000 P.T.Benny

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. M/S.THOMSON AGENCIES, KOMBODINJAMAKKAL, TRICHUR, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 311/COCH/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Apr 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri. Sathish John Kanichai, FCA
Section 132Section 153ASection 68

23-05-2005 12000 P.T.Benny 24-05-2005 11000 P.T.Davis 25-05-2005 12000 P.T.Varghese 09-08-2005 15000 Gracy Thomas 09-08-2005 12000 Reeny Johnson 09-08-2005 15000 P.T.Benny 09-08-2005 8000 P.T.Davis 09-08-2005 15000 P.T.Varghese 27-10-2005 20000 Gracy Thomas 27-10-2005 20000 Reeny Johnson 27-10-2005 20000 P.T.Benny

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. M/S.THOMSON AGENCIES, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 313/COCH/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Apr 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri. Sathish John Kanichai, FCA
Section 132Section 153ASection 68

23-05-2005 12000 P.T.Benny 24-05-2005 11000 P.T.Davis 25-05-2005 12000 P.T.Varghese 09-08-2005 15000 Gracy Thomas 09-08-2005 12000 Reeny Johnson 09-08-2005 15000 P.T.Benny 09-08-2005 8000 P.T.Davis 09-08-2005 15000 P.T.Varghese 27-10-2005 20000 Gracy Thomas 27-10-2005 20000 Reeny Johnson 27-10-2005 20000 P.T.Benny

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, KOCHI, KOCHI vs. M/S.THOMSON AGENCIES, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 315/COCH/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Apr 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri. Sathish John Kanichai, FCA
Section 132Section 153ASection 68

23-05-2005 12000 P.T.Benny 24-05-2005 11000 P.T.Davis 25-05-2005 12000 P.T.Varghese 09-08-2005 15000 Gracy Thomas 09-08-2005 12000 Reeny Johnson 09-08-2005 15000 P.T.Benny 09-08-2005 8000 P.T.Davis 09-08-2005 15000 P.T.Varghese 27-10-2005 20000 Gracy Thomas 27-10-2005 20000 Reeny Johnson 27-10-2005 20000 P.T.Benny

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. M/S.THOMSON AGENCIES, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 316/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Apr 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri. Sathish John Kanichai, FCA
Section 132Section 153ASection 68

23-05-2005 12000 P.T.Benny 24-05-2005 11000 P.T.Davis 25-05-2005 12000 P.T.Varghese 09-08-2005 15000 Gracy Thomas 09-08-2005 12000 Reeny Johnson 09-08-2005 15000 P.T.Benny 09-08-2005 8000 P.T.Davis 09-08-2005 15000 P.T.Varghese 27-10-2005 20000 Gracy Thomas 27-10-2005 20000 Reeny Johnson 27-10-2005 20000 P.T.Benny

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. M/S.THOMSON AGENCIES, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 312/COCH/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Apr 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri. Sathish John Kanichai, FCA
Section 132Section 153ASection 68

23-05-2005 12000 P.T.Benny 24-05-2005 11000 P.T.Davis 25-05-2005 12000 P.T.Varghese 09-08-2005 15000 Gracy Thomas 09-08-2005 12000 Reeny Johnson 09-08-2005 15000 P.T.Benny 09-08-2005 8000 P.T.Davis 09-08-2005 15000 P.T.Varghese 27-10-2005 20000 Gracy Thomas 27-10-2005 20000 Reeny Johnson 27-10-2005 20000 P.T.Benny

MARINE BUSINESS ASSOCIATES,KANNUR vs. ITO, KANNUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 558/COCH/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: --- None ---For Respondent: Smt.Girly Albert, Sr.DR
Section 145A

10 ITA No.558/Coch/2023. Marine Business Associates. liability incurred for the same under any law in force. This amendment is proposed as the valuation of inventory after this adjustment will present the correct value." 17. We have also considered the decision of the Privy Council in the case of CIT v. Ahmedabad New Cotton Mills

V.K.M FEEDS PRIVATE LIMITED,TAMILNADU vs. ACIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 939/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhailassessment Year : 2017-18 Vkm Feeds Private Limited, Acit, Central Circle, 2, Reservoir Street, Thrissur Venkatesa Colony, Vs. Pollachi-642001 Tamil Nadu Pan : Aafcv2454D (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Shaji Paulose, Ca For Revenue : Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, Cit-Dr (Heard In Hybrid Bench) Date Of Hearing : 25-03-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 27-05-2025

For Appellant: Shri Shaji Paulose, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 132(4)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 153CSection 250Section 68

68 of the Act. 20. However, it is an undisputed fact that the statement recorded under Section 132(4) of the Act has better evidentiary value but it is also a settled position of law that addition cannot be sustained merely on the basis of the statement. There has to be some material corroborating the content of the statements

THE FEDERAL BANK LTD,ALUVA vs. THE ACIT, KOCHI

In the result, appeals of the Assessee and revenue for AY 2008-09 to 2010-

ITA 747/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Dec 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. S. Padmavathy

For Appellant: Shri Rajesekharan, CA and Shri K.Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J. M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR, Cochin
Section 147Section 14ASection 154

23,75,372 Rs.4,79,33,244 Rs.4,68,60,335 Disallowed u/s.14A - Rs.97,00,000 Rs.83,34,000 being 0.5% of the average tax free investments ITA Nos. 745 to 747/Coch/2019 ITA Nos. 33 to 35, 272 to 275, 309 to 311/Coch/2020 Page 3 of 28 Amount disallowed Rs.12,37,89,000 Rs.11,80,57,000 Rs.4,68

ACIT, KOCHI vs. FEDERAL BANK LTD, ALUVA

In the result, appeals of the Assessee and revenue for AY 2008-09 to 2010-

ITA 35/COCH/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Dec 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. S. Padmavathy

For Appellant: Shri Rajesekharan, CA and Shri K.Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J. M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR, Cochin
Section 147Section 14ASection 154

23,75,372 Rs.4,79,33,244 Rs.4,68,60,335 Disallowed u/s.14A - Rs.97,00,000 Rs.83,34,000 being 0.5% of the average tax free investments ITA Nos. 745 to 747/Coch/2019 ITA Nos. 33 to 35, 272 to 275, 309 to 311/Coch/2020 Page 3 of 28 Amount disallowed Rs.12,37,89,000 Rs.11,80,57,000 Rs.4,68

THE ACIT, , KOCHI vs. M/S.FEDERAL BANK LTD, KOCHI

In the result, appeals of the Assessee and revenue for AY 2008-09 to 2010-

ITA 309/COCH/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Dec 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. S. Padmavathy

For Appellant: Shri Rajesekharan, CA and Shri K.Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J. M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR, Cochin
Section 147Section 14ASection 154

23,75,372 Rs.4,79,33,244 Rs.4,68,60,335 Disallowed u/s.14A - Rs.97,00,000 Rs.83,34,000 being 0.5% of the average tax free investments ITA Nos. 745 to 747/Coch/2019 ITA Nos. 33 to 35, 272 to 275, 309 to 311/Coch/2020 Page 3 of 28 Amount disallowed Rs.12,37,89,000 Rs.11,80,57,000 Rs.4,68

ACIT, KOCHI vs. FEDERAL BANK LTD, ALUVA

In the result, appeals of the Assessee and revenue for AY 2008-09 to 2010-

ITA 33/COCH/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Dec 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. S. Padmavathy

For Appellant: Shri Rajesekharan, CA and Shri K.Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J. M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR, Cochin
Section 147Section 14ASection 154

23,75,372 Rs.4,79,33,244 Rs.4,68,60,335 Disallowed u/s.14A - Rs.97,00,000 Rs.83,34,000 being 0.5% of the average tax free investments ITA Nos. 745 to 747/Coch/2019 ITA Nos. 33 to 35, 272 to 275, 309 to 311/Coch/2020 Page 3 of 28 Amount disallowed Rs.12,37,89,000 Rs.11,80,57,000 Rs.4,68

ACIT, KOCHI vs. FEDERAL BANK LTD, ALUVA

In the result, appeals of the Assessee and revenue for AY 2008-09 to 2010-

ITA 34/COCH/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Dec 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. S. Padmavathy

For Appellant: Shri Rajesekharan, CA and Shri K.Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J. M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR, Cochin
Section 147Section 14ASection 154

23,75,372 Rs.4,79,33,244 Rs.4,68,60,335 Disallowed u/s.14A - Rs.97,00,000 Rs.83,34,000 being 0.5% of the average tax free investments ITA Nos. 745 to 747/Coch/2019 ITA Nos. 33 to 35, 272 to 275, 309 to 311/Coch/2020 Page 3 of 28 Amount disallowed Rs.12,37,89,000 Rs.11,80,57,000 Rs.4,68

THE FEDERAL BANK LTD,ALUVA vs. THE ACIT, KOCHI

In the result, appeals of the Assessee and revenue for AY 2008-09 to 2010-

ITA 272/COCH/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Dec 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. S. Padmavathy

For Appellant: Shri Rajesekharan, CA and Shri K.Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J. M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR, Cochin
Section 147Section 14ASection 154

23,75,372 Rs.4,79,33,244 Rs.4,68,60,335 Disallowed u/s.14A - Rs.97,00,000 Rs.83,34,000 being 0.5% of the average tax free investments ITA Nos. 745 to 747/Coch/2019 ITA Nos. 33 to 35, 272 to 275, 309 to 311/Coch/2020 Page 3 of 28 Amount disallowed Rs.12,37,89,000 Rs.11,80,57,000 Rs.4,68

THE FEDERAL BANK LTD,ALUVA vs. THE ACIT, KOCHI

In the result, appeals of the Assessee and revenue for AY 2008-09 to 2010-

ITA 275/COCH/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Dec 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. S. Padmavathy

For Appellant: Shri Rajesekharan, CA and Shri K.Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J. M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR, Cochin
Section 147Section 14ASection 154

23,75,372 Rs.4,79,33,244 Rs.4,68,60,335 Disallowed u/s.14A - Rs.97,00,000 Rs.83,34,000 being 0.5% of the average tax free investments ITA Nos. 745 to 747/Coch/2019 ITA Nos. 33 to 35, 272 to 275, 309 to 311/Coch/2020 Page 3 of 28 Amount disallowed Rs.12,37,89,000 Rs.11,80,57,000 Rs.4,68

THE ACIT, KOCHI vs. THE FEDERAL BANK LTD, ERNAKULAM

In the result, appeals of the Assessee and revenue for AY 2008-09 to 2010-

ITA 310/COCH/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Dec 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. S. Padmavathy

For Appellant: Shri Rajesekharan, CA and Shri K.Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J. M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR, Cochin
Section 147Section 14ASection 154

23,75,372 Rs.4,79,33,244 Rs.4,68,60,335 Disallowed u/s.14A - Rs.97,00,000 Rs.83,34,000 being 0.5% of the average tax free investments ITA Nos. 745 to 747/Coch/2019 ITA Nos. 33 to 35, 272 to 275, 309 to 311/Coch/2020 Page 3 of 28 Amount disallowed Rs.12,37,89,000 Rs.11,80,57,000 Rs.4,68

THE FEDERAL BANK LTD,ALUVA vs. THE ACIT, KOCHI

In the result, appeals of the Assessee and revenue for AY 2008-09 to 2010-

ITA 745/COCH/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Dec 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. S. Padmavathy

For Appellant: Shri Rajesekharan, CA and Shri K.Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J. M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR, Cochin
Section 147Section 14ASection 154

23,75,372 Rs.4,79,33,244 Rs.4,68,60,335 Disallowed u/s.14A - Rs.97,00,000 Rs.83,34,000 being 0.5% of the average tax free investments ITA Nos. 745 to 747/Coch/2019 ITA Nos. 33 to 35, 272 to 275, 309 to 311/Coch/2020 Page 3 of 28 Amount disallowed Rs.12,37,89,000 Rs.11,80,57,000 Rs.4,68