BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

263 results for “section 68”+ Section 10(22)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,740Mumbai4,562Bangalore1,646Chennai1,160Kolkata1,083Ahmedabad1,034Jaipur933Hyderabad836Karnataka705Pune641Surat498Chandigarh498Indore495Raipur284Cochin263Visakhapatnam244Rajkot217Cuttack153Agra152Nagpur150Amritsar135Lucknow125Telangana122Guwahati102Ranchi88SC82Calcutta73Allahabad66Jodhpur57Patna50Panaji38Dehradun38Jabalpur23Varanasi18Rajasthan11Orissa10Kerala10A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN4Uttarakhand3Gauhati2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Himachal Pradesh1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Andhra Pradesh1Tripura1

Key Topics

Section 14A75Section 25056Limitation/Time-bar43Section 201(1)20Section 271C15Addition to Income15Section 14713Section 15413Section 143(3)11Disallowance

RAMAPURAM NORTH AISWARYA PRADAYINI SCB LTD ,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ITO WARD 3, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

ITA 556/COCH/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhassessment Year 2017-18 Ramapuram North Aiswarya Pradayini Scb Ltd. Ramapuram North, The Income Tax Officer Vs. Keerikadu P.O., Alappuzha Ward - 3, Pin - 690508 Alappuzha Pan Aacar2023D (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: ------- None -------For Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 139(1)Section 250Section 80ASection 80A(5)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

68 taxmann.com 298 (Ker.) These Revenue’s contentions rejected accordingly. 3 Ramapuram North Aiswarya Pradayini SCB Ltd. 4. Learned DR’s next case is that assessee had violated the corresponding norms by not having extended credit facility by way of agricultural loans to the eligible members. We find that hon’ble apex court’s landmark decision Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank

Showing 1–20 of 263 · Page 1 of 14

...
11
Section 20110
Deduction9

VILAVATTAM SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD NO 337,THRISSUR vs. ITO WARD 2(3), THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

ITA 337/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Nov 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: ------- None ------
Section 148Section 2Section 22Section 250Section 56Section 80A(5)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

68 taxmann.com 298 (Ker.) having decided the very issue in assessee’s favour. Ordered accordingly. Vilvattam Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. 5. The Revenue’s next vehement contentions seeks to treat the assessee as a cooperative bank u/sec.80P(2)(4) than a credit cooperative society as per Pr. CIT vs. Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank

VILAVATTAM SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD NO 337,THRISSUR vs. ITO WARD 2(3), THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

ITA 336/COCH/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Nov 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: ------- None ------
Section 148Section 2Section 22Section 250Section 56Section 80A(5)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

68 taxmann.com 298 (Ker.) having decided the very issue in assessee’s favour. Ordered accordingly. Vilvattam Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. 5. The Revenue’s next vehement contentions seeks to treat the assessee as a cooperative bank u/sec.80P(2)(4) than a credit cooperative society as per Pr. CIT vs. Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank

INFOPARKS KERALA,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 77/COCH/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

section 2(15). However, the Court does not rule out any future claim made and being independently assessed, if GS1 is able to satisfy that what it provides to its customers is charged on cost-basis with at the most, a nominal mark-up. The foregoing neatly sums up the adjudication qua entities as the assessee, which is accordingly

INFOPARKS KERALA,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT (OSD) EXEM), COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 75/COCH/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

section 2(15). However, the Court does not rule out any future claim made and being independently assessed, if GS1 is able to satisfy that what it provides to its customers is charged on cost-basis with at the most, a nominal mark-up. The foregoing neatly sums up the adjudication qua entities as the assessee, which is accordingly

INFOPARKS KERALA,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT (OSD) EXEM), COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 76/COCH/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

section 2(15). However, the Court does not rule out any future claim made and being independently assessed, if GS1 is able to satisfy that what it provides to its customers is charged on cost-basis with at the most, a nominal mark-up. The foregoing neatly sums up the adjudication qua entities as the assessee, which is accordingly

SRI.K.M. ASHIK,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 77/COCH/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Jan 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2Section 2(22)(e)

section 2(22)(e ) of the Income Tax Act . Your appellant relies on the following decisions. CIT v. Creative Dyeing & Printing (P.) Ltd. [2009] 318 ITR 476. The departmental SLP filed against this decision has been dismissed by the supreme court ( 328 ITR (St)10) (SC) CIT v. Ambassador Travels (P.) Ltd. [2009] 318 ITR 376 The matter

SRI.K.M. ASHIK,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 76/COCH/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Jan 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2Section 2(22)(e)

section 2(22)(e ) of the Income Tax Act . Your appellant relies on the following decisions. CIT v. Creative Dyeing & Printing (P.) Ltd. [2009] 318 ITR 476. The departmental SLP filed against this decision has been dismissed by the supreme court ( 328 ITR (St)10) (SC) CIT v. Ambassador Travels (P.) Ltd. [2009] 318 ITR 376 The matter

SRI.K.M. ASHIK,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 75/COCH/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Jan 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2Section 2(22)(e)

section 2(22)(e ) of the Income Tax Act . Your appellant relies on the following decisions. CIT v. Creative Dyeing & Printing (P.) Ltd. [2009] 318 ITR 476. The departmental SLP filed against this decision has been dismissed by the supreme court ( 328 ITR (St)10) (SC) CIT v. Ambassador Travels (P.) Ltd. [2009] 318 ITR 376 The matter

SRI.ANWARSADATH,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ITO, WD-1, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 456/COCH/2019[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 Jan 2020AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri George George K.

Section 147Section 68

22- 10-2002, a payment of Rs. 1,71,758 was effected to the assessee on 26-11-2002 after setting of the loan availed.” 6. As such it was concluded that the assessee was left with no money other than the aforesaid sum of Rs, 1,71,758 during the period relevant to AY 2003-04 to be introduced

SRI.ANWARSADATH,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ITO, WD-1, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 457/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 Jan 2020AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri George George K.

Section 147Section 68

22- 10-2002, a payment of Rs. 1,71,758 was effected to the assessee on 26-11-2002 after setting of the loan availed.” 6. As such it was concluded that the assessee was left with no money other than the aforesaid sum of Rs, 1,71,758 during the period relevant to AY 2003-04 to be introduced

THE ACIT, KOLLAM vs. SRI.P.SUNILKUMAR, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 351/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

10. 359/Coch/2017 2014-15 -do- -do- 11. 360/Coch/2017 2015-16 -do- -do- 12. 33/Coch/2017 2009-10 Shri P. Sunil Kumar, The Asst.CIT,Central Circle, Sabari Quality Foods, Kollam Asramam, Kollam- 691002. [PAN:AADPK 3945M] 13. 34/Coch/2017 2010-11 -do- -do- 14. 35/Coch/2017 2011-12 -do- -do- 15. 36/Coch/2017 2012-13 -do- -do- 16. 37/Coch/2017 2013-14 -do- -do- 17. 38/Coch/2017

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOLLAM vs. M/S.SABARI ENTERPRISES P. LTD,, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 359/COCH/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

10. 359/Coch/2017 2014-15 -do- -do- 11. 360/Coch/2017 2015-16 -do- -do- 12. 33/Coch/2017 2009-10 Shri P. Sunil Kumar, The Asst.CIT,Central Circle, Sabari Quality Foods, Kollam Asramam, Kollam- 691002. [PAN:AADPK 3945M] 13. 34/Coch/2017 2010-11 -do- -do- 14. 35/Coch/2017 2011-12 -do- -do- 15. 36/Coch/2017 2012-13 -do- -do- 16. 37/Coch/2017 2013-14 -do- -do- 17. 38/Coch/2017

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOLLAM vs. M/S.SABARI ENTERPRISES P. LTD,, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 360/COCH/2017[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2015-2016

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

10. 359/Coch/2017 2014-15 -do- -do- 11. 360/Coch/2017 2015-16 -do- -do- 12. 33/Coch/2017 2009-10 Shri P. Sunil Kumar, The Asst.CIT,Central Circle, Sabari Quality Foods, Kollam Asramam, Kollam- 691002. [PAN:AADPK 3945M] 13. 34/Coch/2017 2010-11 -do- -do- 14. 35/Coch/2017 2011-12 -do- -do- 15. 36/Coch/2017 2012-13 -do- -do- 16. 37/Coch/2017 2013-14 -do- -do- 17. 38/Coch/2017

THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOLLAM, KOLLAM vs. SRI.P>SUNIL KUMAR, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 354/COCH/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

10. 359/Coch/2017 2014-15 -do- -do- 11. 360/Coch/2017 2015-16 -do- -do- 12. 33/Coch/2017 2009-10 Shri P. Sunil Kumar, The Asst.CIT,Central Circle, Sabari Quality Foods, Kollam Asramam, Kollam- 691002. [PAN:AADPK 3945M] 13. 34/Coch/2017 2010-11 -do- -do- 14. 35/Coch/2017 2011-12 -do- -do- 15. 36/Coch/2017 2012-13 -do- -do- 16. 37/Coch/2017 2013-14 -do- -do- 17. 38/Coch/2017

THE ACIT, KOLLAM vs. SRI.P.SUNILKUMAR, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 348/COCH/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

10. 359/Coch/2017 2014-15 -do- -do- 11. 360/Coch/2017 2015-16 -do- -do- 12. 33/Coch/2017 2009-10 Shri P. Sunil Kumar, The Asst.CIT,Central Circle, Sabari Quality Foods, Kollam Asramam, Kollam- 691002. [PAN:AADPK 3945M] 13. 34/Coch/2017 2010-11 -do- -do- 14. 35/Coch/2017 2011-12 -do- -do- 15. 36/Coch/2017 2012-13 -do- -do- 16. 37/Coch/2017 2013-14 -do- -do- 17. 38/Coch/2017

THE CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOLLAM, THE CENTRAL CIRCLE,KOLLAM vs. SRI.P.SUNIL KUMAR, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 349/COCH/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

10. 359/Coch/2017 2014-15 -do- -do- 11. 360/Coch/2017 2015-16 -do- -do- 12. 33/Coch/2017 2009-10 Shri P. Sunil Kumar, The Asst.CIT,Central Circle, Sabari Quality Foods, Kollam Asramam, Kollam- 691002. [PAN:AADPK 3945M] 13. 34/Coch/2017 2010-11 -do- -do- 14. 35/Coch/2017 2011-12 -do- -do- 15. 36/Coch/2017 2012-13 -do- -do- 16. 37/Coch/2017 2013-14 -do- -do- 17. 38/Coch/2017

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOLLAM vs. M/S.SABARI ENTERPRISES P. LTD,, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 358/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

10. 359/Coch/2017 2014-15 -do- -do- 11. 360/Coch/2017 2015-16 -do- -do- 12. 33/Coch/2017 2009-10 Shri P. Sunil Kumar, The Asst.CIT,Central Circle, Sabari Quality Foods, Kollam Asramam, Kollam- 691002. [PAN:AADPK 3945M] 13. 34/Coch/2017 2010-11 -do- -do- 14. 35/Coch/2017 2011-12 -do- -do- 15. 36/Coch/2017 2012-13 -do- -do- 16. 37/Coch/2017 2013-14 -do- -do- 17. 38/Coch/2017

SRI.P.SUNIL KUMAR,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,KOLLAM, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 355/COCH/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

10. 359/Coch/2017 2014-15 -do- -do- 11. 360/Coch/2017 2015-16 -do- -do- 12. 33/Coch/2017 2009-10 Shri P. Sunil Kumar, The Asst.CIT,Central Circle, Sabari Quality Foods, Kollam Asramam, Kollam- 691002. [PAN:AADPK 3945M] 13. 34/Coch/2017 2010-11 -do- -do- 14. 35/Coch/2017 2011-12 -do- -do- 15. 36/Coch/2017 2012-13 -do- -do- 16. 37/Coch/2017 2013-14 -do- -do- 17. 38/Coch/2017

THE ACIT, KOLLAM vs. SRI.P. SUNIL KUMAR, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 347/COCH/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

10. 359/Coch/2017 2014-15 -do- -do- 11. 360/Coch/2017 2015-16 -do- -do- 12. 33/Coch/2017 2009-10 Shri P. Sunil Kumar, The Asst.CIT,Central Circle, Sabari Quality Foods, Kollam Asramam, Kollam- 691002. [PAN:AADPK 3945M] 13. 34/Coch/2017 2010-11 -do- -do- 14. 35/Coch/2017 2011-12 -do- -do- 15. 36/Coch/2017 2012-13 -do- -do- 16. 37/Coch/2017 2013-14 -do- -do- 17. 38/Coch/2017