Search: reassessment u/s 147

9 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 274clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)22 Section 10B17 Section 143(3)9 Section 1488 Penalty7 Addition to Income7 Section 1435 Disallowance5 Section 271(1)

MR.BABU MATHEW,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 96/COCH/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Jan 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 69

147 before appeals. The Hon’ble High Court of Kerala in the case of CIT vs. K. Mahim reported in 15 Taxman 557 has held that mere filing of return would not exonerate assessee from liability to penalty, nor filing of revised return after the departmental investigation would absolve the assessee from penalty.” 4. The CIT(A) observed that

MR.BABU MATHEW,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

MR.BABU MATHEW,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

MR.BABU MATHEW,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

MR.BABU MATHEW,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

MRS. THANKAMANI VARADARAJULU,KOTTAYAM vs. THE DCIT,CEN-CIRCLE-2, TRIVANDRUM

M/S.SOORYA DRUG HOUSE,THODUPUZHA vs. THE ITO,WD-2, THODUPUZHA

M/S.SOORYA DRUG HOUSE,THODUPUZHA vs. THE ITO,WD-2, THODUPUZHA

THE ACIT, ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S. THE ALLEPPEY CO. LTD, ALAPPUZHA

SMT. AMINA ANVAR,KOLLAM vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE 1, ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA

HERCULES AUTOMOBILES INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. AO TYPE-W, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, ALLEPPEY

M/S.AKAY FLAVOURS & AROMATICS P. LTD,ERNAKULAM vs. THE ACIT, ERNAKULAM