MARIAMMA JOSEPH,KOTTAYAMN vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM,, KOTTAYAM
In the result, the assessee’s appeal is decided on the aforesaid terms
ITA 672/COCH/2022[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Mar 2024AY 2010-2011
Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Dasmariamma Joseph Asst. Cit, Central Circle Hotel Floral Park Kottayam 686001 Gandhinagar Vs. Kottayam 686008 [Pan:Accpj9135F] (Appellant) (Respondent)
For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154Section 208Section 210Section 234Section 234BSection 234B(3)
15,36,914, would thus range from a period of 12 months (April,
2012 to March, 2013) to 29 months (November, 2010 to March, 2013) and, thus, vary from 1,84,428 to Rs. 4,45,700, i.e., depending on the time of processing her return u/s. 143(1). The same, computed at Rs. 6,45,503, was thus
