UNNIKRISHNAN. K,KUNNAMPALLY vs. THE ITO WARD 2, TIRUR
In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed on the aforesaid terms, and his stay petition dismissed
ITA 955/COCH/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Mar 2024AY 2011-12
Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Dr. Seethalakshmi
For Appellant: Shri Arun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 148(1)
u/s. 147, is made where an income is found subsequent to assessment to have escaped assessment. It therefore necessarily includes the income already assessed. This is, as afore-noted, for the reason that the assessing
SA No. 11/Coch/2023
Unnikrishnan Kunnampally v. ITO authority is thereby reassessing the assessee’s total income for the relevant year. The AO was thus duty