BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 127clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi540Mumbai244Jaipur146Bangalore117Chandigarh94Hyderabad85Raipur54Ahmedabad50Kolkata48Chennai38Pune37Lucknow35Telangana24Indore23Guwahati22Amritsar22Nagpur21Surat21Patna20Jodhpur18Cochin15Rajkot12Dehradun8Visakhapatnam7Cuttack7Agra5Allahabad4Orissa2Rajasthan1SC1Varanasi1Panaji1

Key Topics

Addition to Income15Exemption13Section 2634Section 271(1)(c)4Section 143(1)2Section 133A2Section 1482Section 1432Section 274

SRI.R.PRAKASH,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 41/COCH/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

127 DTR (Del) 323. He also relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Sona Okegawa Precision Forgings Ltd. vs. Addl. CIT (2012) 143 TTJ (Del) 516. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) strongly felt that ALP means maximum price and it should be followed. To this, the Ld. AR submitted that observation of Delhi

SMT. T.C. USHA,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 45/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

127 DTR (Del) 323. He also relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Sona Okegawa Precision Forgings Ltd. vs. Addl. CIT (2012) 143 TTJ (Del) 516. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) strongly felt that ALP means maximum price and it should be followed. To this, the Ld. AR submitted that observation of Delhi

2
Section 1532
Depreciation2
Penalty2

SRI.R. PRATAP,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 38/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

127 DTR (Del) 323. He also relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Sona Okegawa Precision Forgings Ltd. vs. Addl. CIT (2012) 143 TTJ (Del) 516. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) strongly felt that ALP means maximum price and it should be followed. To this, the Ld. AR submitted that observation of Delhi

M/S. VIJAYALAXMICASHEW CO.,,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 47/COCH/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

127 DTR (Del) 323. He also relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Sona Okegawa Precision Forgings Ltd. vs. Addl. CIT (2012) 143 TTJ (Del) 516. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) strongly felt that ALP means maximum price and it should be followed. To this, the Ld. AR submitted that observation of Delhi

M/S. VIJAYALAXMICASHEW CO.,,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 48/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

127 DTR (Del) 323. He also relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Sona Okegawa Precision Forgings Ltd. vs. Addl. CIT (2012) 143 TTJ (Del) 516. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) strongly felt that ALP means maximum price and it should be followed. To this, the Ld. AR submitted that observation of Delhi

SMT. T.C. USHA,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 44/COCH/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

127 DTR (Del) 323. He also relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Sona Okegawa Precision Forgings Ltd. vs. Addl. CIT (2012) 143 TTJ (Del) 516. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) strongly felt that ALP means maximum price and it should be followed. To this, the Ld. AR submitted that observation of Delhi

M/S. VIJAYALAXMICASHEW CO.,,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 49/COCH/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

127 DTR (Del) 323. He also relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Sona Okegawa Precision Forgings Ltd. vs. Addl. CIT (2012) 143 TTJ (Del) 516. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) strongly felt that ALP means maximum price and it should be followed. To this, the Ld. AR submitted that observation of Delhi

SRI.R.PRAKASH,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 40/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

127 DTR (Del) 323. He also relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Sona Okegawa Precision Forgings Ltd. vs. Addl. CIT (2012) 143 TTJ (Del) 516. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) strongly felt that ALP means maximum price and it should be followed. To this, the Ld. AR submitted that observation of Delhi

SRI.K.RAVINDRANATHAN NAIR,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 46/COCH/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

127 DTR (Del) 323. He also relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Sona Okegawa Precision Forgings Ltd. vs. Addl. CIT (2012) 143 TTJ (Del) 516. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) strongly felt that ALP means maximum price and it should be followed. To this, the Ld. AR submitted that observation of Delhi

SRI.R. PRATAP,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 39/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

127 DTR (Del) 323. He also relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Sona Okegawa Precision Forgings Ltd. vs. Addl. CIT (2012) 143 TTJ (Del) 516. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) strongly felt that ALP means maximum price and it should be followed. To this, the Ld. AR submitted that observation of Delhi

SRI.R.PRAKASH,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 42/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

127 DTR (Del) 323. He also relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Sona Okegawa Precision Forgings Ltd. vs. Addl. CIT (2012) 143 TTJ (Del) 516. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) strongly felt that ALP means maximum price and it should be followed. To this, the Ld. AR submitted that observation of Delhi

SRI.R. PRATAP,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 37/COCH/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

127 DTR (Del) 323. He also relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Sona Okegawa Precision Forgings Ltd. vs. Addl. CIT (2012) 143 TTJ (Del) 516. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) strongly felt that ALP means maximum price and it should be followed. To this, the Ld. AR submitted that observation of Delhi

SRI.R.PRAKASH,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 43/COCH/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

127 DTR (Del) 323. He also relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Sona Okegawa Precision Forgings Ltd. vs. Addl. CIT (2012) 143 TTJ (Del) 516. According to the Ld. AR, the CIT(A) strongly felt that ALP means maximum price and it should be followed. To this, the Ld. AR submitted that observation of Delhi

M/S.SOORYA DRUG HOUSE,THODUPUZHA vs. THE ITO,WD-2, THODUPUZHA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 237/COCH/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 Aug 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Mathew JosephFor Respondent: Sri.Shantom Bose
Section 133ASection 143Section 143(1)Section 148Section 153Section 263Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

147 of the I.T.Act on 28.03.2016 and 30.03.2016 for assessment years 2012-2013 and 2013-2014, respectively. In the assessments completed, total income determined for assessment year 2012-2013 was at Rs.26,28,950 and for assessment year 2013-2014 was at Rs.25,18,390. The additions of Rs.5,15,165 and Rs.2,22,127 for assessment years

M/S.SOORYA DRUG HOUSE,THODUPUZHA vs. THE ITO,WD-2, THODUPUZHA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 236/COCH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 Aug 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Mathew JosephFor Respondent: Sri.Shantom Bose
Section 133ASection 143Section 143(1)Section 148Section 153Section 263Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

147 of the I.T.Act on 28.03.2016 and 30.03.2016 for assessment years 2012-2013 and 2013-2014, respectively. In the assessments completed, total income determined for assessment year 2012-2013 was at Rs.26,28,950 and for assessment year 2013-2014 was at Rs.25,18,390. The additions of Rs.5,15,165 and Rs.2,22,127 for assessment years