BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

73 results for “reassessment”+ Set Off of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,195Delhi1,723Chennai887Bangalore543Kolkata483Jaipur458Ahmedabad409Hyderabad279Pune213Chandigarh163Indore145Raipur133Rajkot126Surat115Visakhapatnam101Cuttack84Nagpur78Amritsar74Cochin73Guwahati66Patna65Karnataka55Lucknow54Jodhpur41Agra37Dehradun25Ranchi25SC23Allahabad22Telangana21Jabalpur9Panaji6Calcutta6Orissa5Kerala4Punjab & Haryana3Varanasi3K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Rajasthan1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)78Section 14762Section 26345Addition to Income43Section 14841Section 153A23Exemption20Reassessment19Section 14A18Section 115B

SHAHUL HAMEED,MANANTHAVADY vs. ITO, WARD-2, KALPETTA

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 355/COCH/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 Mar 2025AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: --- None ---For Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Sr.AR
Section 115Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 250Section 69

set-off of loss under the head “House Property” against the addition 2 ITA No.355/Coch/2024. Sri.Sahul Hameed. made under section 69 of the Act by applying the provisions of section 115-BBE(2) of the Act. 3. The brief facts of the case pertaining to this issue, as emanating from the record, are: The assessee is one of the partners

Showing 1–20 of 73 · Page 1 of 4

17
Section 10B17
Deduction16

KINGS INFRA VENTURES LTD,THEVARA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1 (2), KOCHI, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 25/COCH/2017[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Apr 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Sandeep Gosainkings Infra Ventures Ltd. Asstt. Commissioner Of A-1, 1St Floor, Atria Apartment Income Tax, Opp. Gurudwara Temple Vs. Circle - 1(2) Perumanur Road Kochi Thevara, Kochi [Pan:Aaccv3411D] (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant By: Shri Joseph Markose, Sr. Advocate Respondent By: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R.

For Appellant: Shri Joseph Markose, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)

losses carried/brought forward and set off, if and as needed.” The Tribunal vide order dated 14/7/2017 confirmed the same, holding as under: 2 | P a g e Kings Infra Ventures Ltd. v. Asst. CIT “6.3 The above factual finding of the CIT(A) that the asset in question was not kept ready for use condition and there was no passive

M/S.AKAY FLAVOURS & AROMATICS P. LTD,ERNAKULAM vs. THE ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assesseee is allowed as indicated

ITA 491/COCH/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin05 Feb 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm Assessment Year : 2004-05

Section 10ASection 10BSection 139(1)Section 143Section 32(2)Section 72

reassessment completed, deduction claimed by the assessee u/s. 10B of the Act was reduced to ‘Nil’ . The Assessing Officer recomputed the deduction u/s. 10B of the Act after setting off carry forward business loss

KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), THIRUVANANHAPURAM

ITA 171/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Dijo Mathew, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 270ASection 270A(1)Section 270A(2)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 40

loss, the amount of tax calculated on the under-reported income as if it were the total income; (c) in any other case, determined in accordance with the formula— (X-Y) where, X = the amount of tax calculated on the under-reported income as increased by the total income determined under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section

SRI.R.PRAKASH,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 41/COCH/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

set off of b/f losses it was below the taxable limit. 6.6 The Ld. AR submitted that the A.O. should have appreciated that taxation is on real income and this was the essence of the above judgment of the Supreme Court and other judgments. Though CIT(A) endorsedthis, he ignored the same and on his insistence, wt. average price chart

SRI.R. PRATAP,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 37/COCH/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

set off of b/f losses it was below the taxable limit. 6.6 The Ld. AR submitted that the A.O. should have appreciated that taxation is on real income and this was the essence of the above judgment of the Supreme Court and other judgments. Though CIT(A) endorsedthis, he ignored the same and on his insistence, wt. average price chart

SRI.R.PRAKASH,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 43/COCH/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

set off of b/f losses it was below the taxable limit. 6.6 The Ld. AR submitted that the A.O. should have appreciated that taxation is on real income and this was the essence of the above judgment of the Supreme Court and other judgments. Though CIT(A) endorsedthis, he ignored the same and on his insistence, wt. average price chart

SMT. T.C. USHA,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 45/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

set off of b/f losses it was below the taxable limit. 6.6 The Ld. AR submitted that the A.O. should have appreciated that taxation is on real income and this was the essence of the above judgment of the Supreme Court and other judgments. Though CIT(A) endorsedthis, he ignored the same and on his insistence, wt. average price chart

SRI.R. PRATAP,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 39/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

set off of b/f losses it was below the taxable limit. 6.6 The Ld. AR submitted that the A.O. should have appreciated that taxation is on real income and this was the essence of the above judgment of the Supreme Court and other judgments. Though CIT(A) endorsedthis, he ignored the same and on his insistence, wt. average price chart

M/S. VIJAYALAXMICASHEW CO.,,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 47/COCH/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

set off of b/f losses it was below the taxable limit. 6.6 The Ld. AR submitted that the A.O. should have appreciated that taxation is on real income and this was the essence of the above judgment of the Supreme Court and other judgments. Though CIT(A) endorsedthis, he ignored the same and on his insistence, wt. average price chart

SRI.K.RAVINDRANATHAN NAIR,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 46/COCH/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

set off of b/f losses it was below the taxable limit. 6.6 The Ld. AR submitted that the A.O. should have appreciated that taxation is on real income and this was the essence of the above judgment of the Supreme Court and other judgments. Though CIT(A) endorsedthis, he ignored the same and on his insistence, wt. average price chart

M/S. VIJAYALAXMICASHEW CO.,,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 48/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

set off of b/f losses it was below the taxable limit. 6.6 The Ld. AR submitted that the A.O. should have appreciated that taxation is on real income and this was the essence of the above judgment of the Supreme Court and other judgments. Though CIT(A) endorsedthis, he ignored the same and on his insistence, wt. average price chart

M/S. VIJAYALAXMICASHEW CO.,,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 49/COCH/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

set off of b/f losses it was below the taxable limit. 6.6 The Ld. AR submitted that the A.O. should have appreciated that taxation is on real income and this was the essence of the above judgment of the Supreme Court and other judgments. Though CIT(A) endorsedthis, he ignored the same and on his insistence, wt. average price chart

SRI.R.PRAKASH,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 40/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

set off of b/f losses it was below the taxable limit. 6.6 The Ld. AR submitted that the A.O. should have appreciated that taxation is on real income and this was the essence of the above judgment of the Supreme Court and other judgments. Though CIT(A) endorsedthis, he ignored the same and on his insistence, wt. average price chart

SRI.R. PRATAP,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 38/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

set off of b/f losses it was below the taxable limit. 6.6 The Ld. AR submitted that the A.O. should have appreciated that taxation is on real income and this was the essence of the above judgment of the Supreme Court and other judgments. Though CIT(A) endorsedthis, he ignored the same and on his insistence, wt. average price chart

SRI.R.PRAKASH,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 42/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

set off of b/f losses it was below the taxable limit. 6.6 The Ld. AR submitted that the A.O. should have appreciated that taxation is on real income and this was the essence of the above judgment of the Supreme Court and other judgments. Though CIT(A) endorsedthis, he ignored the same and on his insistence, wt. average price chart

SMT. T.C. USHA,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 44/COCH/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

set off of b/f losses it was below the taxable limit. 6.6 The Ld. AR submitted that the A.O. should have appreciated that taxation is on real income and this was the essence of the above judgment of the Supreme Court and other judgments. Though CIT(A) endorsedthis, he ignored the same and on his insistence, wt. average price chart

SRI SRAVAN KUMAR NEELA,NALGONDA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the instant appeals by the assesses are dismissed

ITA 899/COCH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Dasuma Maheshwara Rao Chinni Asst. Cit, Central Circle -1, Hno. 7-298, 7 Ward Aayakar Bhavan (North Block) Gandhi Bomma Centre Vs. Kozhikode 673001 Dachepalle, Guntur 522414 [Pan:Arjpc0342D] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 115BSection 132ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 69A

set off of business loss there-against, which was restricted to, apart from regular business income, the income surrendered on account of sundry creditors, repairs to building and advances to staff, i.e., relatable to the assessee’s business, was upheld by the Tribunal and, on further appeal, by the Hon’ble High Court. The computational provisions applicable to different heads

SRI UMA MAHESHWARA RAO CHINNI,GUNTUR vs. ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the instant appeals by the assesses are dismissed

ITA 895/COCH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Dasuma Maheshwara Rao Chinni Asst. Cit, Central Circle -1, Hno. 7-298, 7 Ward Aayakar Bhavan (North Block) Gandhi Bomma Centre Vs. Kozhikode 673001 Dachepalle, Guntur 522414 [Pan:Arjpc0342D] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 115BSection 132ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 69A

set off of business loss there-against, which was restricted to, apart from regular business income, the income surrendered on account of sundry creditors, repairs to building and advances to staff, i.e., relatable to the assessee’s business, was upheld by the Tribunal and, on further appeal, by the Hon’ble High Court. The computational provisions applicable to different heads

SRI.P.V.RAVINDRAN,KANNUR vs. THE ITO, KANNUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 302/COCH/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri T.M. Sreedharan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Shantam Bose, CIT DR
Section 115BSection 263Section 3(1)(b)Section 68

set off of any loss shall be allowed to the assessee under any provision of this Act in computing his income referred to in clause (a) gland clause (b)] of sub-section (1). In the light of the above the said amount of Rs. 6,00,000/- is taxed by applying provisions of the section 115BBE. The Assessing Officer