BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “reassessment”+ Section 80Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai25Surat16Pune7Cochin7Delhi6Chennai5Ahmedabad4Jodhpur4Kolkata3Hyderabad3Chandigarh2Indore2Bangalore1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 12A28Section 1121Section 139(1)14Section 153A7Section 10A7Section 1327Section 13(1)(c)7Section 137Charitable Trust7Exemption

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 255/COCH/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

80J(6A) and s. 12A of the Act are para materia. The ratio of the law laid down in Jaideep Industries' case (1989) (180 ITR 81) (P&H) would have been applicable to the facts of the present case as well had the CBDT not issued the Circular dt. 9th Feb., 1978, reproduced in the earlier part of the judgment

7
Addition to Income7

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 256/COCH/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

80J(6A) and s. 12A of the Act are para materia. The ratio of the law laid down in Jaideep Industries' case (1989) (180 ITR 81) (P&H) would have been applicable to the facts of the present case as well had the CBDT not issued the Circular dt. 9th Feb., 1978, reproduced in the earlier part of the judgment

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 258/COCH/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

80J(6A) and s. 12A of the Act are para materia. The ratio of the law laid down in Jaideep Industries' case (1989) (180 ITR 81) (P&H) would have been applicable to the facts of the present case as well had the CBDT not issued the Circular dt. 9th Feb., 1978, reproduced in the earlier part of the judgment

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 260/COCH/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

80J(6A) and s. 12A of the Act are para materia. The ratio of the law laid down in Jaideep Industries' case (1989) (180 ITR 81) (P&H) would have been applicable to the facts of the present case as well had the CBDT not issued the Circular dt. 9th Feb., 1978, reproduced in the earlier part of the judgment

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 257/COCH/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

80J(6A) and s. 12A of the Act are para materia. The ratio of the law laid down in Jaideep Industries' case (1989) (180 ITR 81) (P&H) would have been applicable to the facts of the present case as well had the CBDT not issued the Circular dt. 9th Feb., 1978, reproduced in the earlier part of the judgment

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 259/COCH/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

80J(6A) and s. 12A of the Act are para materia. The ratio of the law laid down in Jaideep Industries' case (1989) (180 ITR 81) (P&H) would have been applicable to the facts of the present case as well had the CBDT not issued the Circular dt. 9th Feb., 1978, reproduced in the earlier part of the judgment

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 261/COCH/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

80J(6A) and s. 12A of the Act are para materia. The ratio of the law laid down in Jaideep Industries' case (1989) (180 ITR 81) (P&H) would have been applicable to the facts of the present case as well had the CBDT not issued the Circular dt. 9th Feb., 1978, reproduced in the earlier part of the judgment