BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “reassessment”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur19Mumbai16Lucknow8Delhi8Cochin7Pune6Hyderabad5Cuttack4Bangalore4Visakhapatnam3Amritsar3Chennai3Surat2Nagpur2Ahmedabad2Kolkata2Ranchi1Varanasi1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 153A14Section 143(3)7Section 1327Depreciation7Disallowance7Addition to Income7

SREEKUMARI AMMA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 601/COCH/2022[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

80C in the return of income and the addition is made for the reason that the evidence in support of the claim is in husband’s name. Accordingly, the Ld.AR submitted that the impugned addition is not again based on any incriminating material but is made towards a deduction which is already claimed in the return of income. Accordingly

SREEKUMARI AMMA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 602/COCH/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

80C in the return of income and the addition is made for the reason that the evidence in support of the claim is in husband’s name. Accordingly, the Ld.AR submitted that the impugned addition is not again based on any incriminating material but is made towards a deduction which is already claimed in the return of income. Accordingly

SREEKUMARI AMMA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 603/COCH/2022[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

80C in the return of income and the addition is made for the reason that the evidence in support of the claim is in husband’s name. Accordingly, the Ld.AR submitted that the impugned addition is not again based on any incriminating material but is made towards a deduction which is already claimed in the return of income. Accordingly

SREEKUMARI AMMA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 604/COCH/2022[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

80C in the return of income and the addition is made for the reason that the evidence in support of the claim is in husband’s name. Accordingly, the Ld.AR submitted that the impugned addition is not again based on any incriminating material but is made towards a deduction which is already claimed in the return of income. Accordingly

SREEKUMARI AMMA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 605/COCH/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2015-2016

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

80C in the return of income and the addition is made for the reason that the evidence in support of the claim is in husband’s name. Accordingly, the Ld.AR submitted that the impugned addition is not again based on any incriminating material but is made towards a deduction which is already claimed in the return of income. Accordingly

SREEKUMARI AMMA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 606/COCH/2022[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2016-2017

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

80C in the return of income and the addition is made for the reason that the evidence in support of the claim is in husband’s name. Accordingly, the Ld.AR submitted that the impugned addition is not again based on any incriminating material but is made towards a deduction which is already claimed in the return of income. Accordingly

SREEKUMARI AMMA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 607/COCH/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

80C in the return of income and the addition is made for the reason that the evidence in support of the claim is in husband’s name. Accordingly, the Ld.AR submitted that the impugned addition is not again based on any incriminating material but is made towards a deduction which is already claimed in the return of income. Accordingly