KK LEISURE & TOURISM INTERNATIONAL (P) LTD,KANNUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2 , KOZHIKODE
In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed, and it’s stay applications dismissed as infructuous
ITA 510/COCH/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Feb 2024AY 2010-11
Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das
For Appellant: Shri Paven Ved, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 133ASection 153ASection 153CSection 69C
73,00,000/- (written by hand)
What, then, he would question, is the incriminating material on the basis of which the satisfaction note stands recorded, and jurisdiction for assessment/s u/s. 153A r/ws.
153C of the Act assumed? Upon being questioned in this respect, he would explain that the assessee, a part of the K.K. Builder’s group