SHRI.PRAKASH R. NAIR,KOLLAM vs. DCIT, KOLLAM
In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 141/COCH/2021[2000-2001]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2024AY 2000-2001
Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Dasprakash R. Nair Dy.Cit, Central Circle Prop. Dhanya Foods Kollam Kochuppilammoodu Vs. Kollam 691001 [Pan:Abfpn4424P] (Appellant) (Respondent)
For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 143(1)Section 148(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 80Section 801A(9)Section 80HSection 80I
292B. Though not a case one, a defective notice, it is well-settled, does not annul proceedings. Reference is made to Kantamani Vankata Narayan & Sons v.
ITO [1967] 63 ITR 638 (SC) where the Hon’ble Court upheld a reassessment notice which did not, similarly, set out the clause under which it was issued. At worst, where a prejudice
