M.K RAJENDRAN PILLAI,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOLLAM, KOLLAM

In the result the appeals for AYs 2012-13 to 2017-18 stand partly allowed whereas the appeal for AY 2018-19 stands allowed on legal grounds in terms of our above order

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, J.M. & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, A.M.

Section 10(26) of the Act. Certain discrepancies and mismatch in signatures were noted in the loan confirmation letters obtained from loan creditors. The funds were also allegedly utilized for making payment to contractors, payment for civil work etc. for the group concerns. Some of the funds were transferred to bank accounts of family members, friends and relatives etc. whereas

M.K RAJENDRAN PILLAI,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOLLAM, KOLLAM

In the result the appeals for AYs 2012-13 to 2017-18 stand partly allowed whereas the appeal for AY 2018-19 stands allowed on legal grounds in terms of our above order

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, J.M. & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, A.M.

Section 10(26) of the Act. Certain discrepancies and mismatch in signatures were noted in the loan confirmation letters obtained from loan creditors. The funds were also allegedly utilized for making payment to contractors, payment for civil work etc. for the group concerns. Some of the funds were transferred to bank accounts of family members, friends and relatives etc. whereas

M.K RAJENDRAN PILLAI,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOLLAM, KOLLAM

In the result the appeals for AYs 2012-13 to 2017-18 stand partly allowed whereas the appeal for AY 2018-19 stands allowed on legal grounds in terms of our above order

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, J.M. & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, A.M.

Section 10(26) of the Act. Certain discrepancies and mismatch in signatures were noted in the loan confirmation letters obtained from loan creditors. The funds were also allegedly utilized for making payment to contractors, payment for civil work etc. for the group concerns. Some of the funds were transferred to bank accounts of family members, friends and relatives etc. whereas

M.K RAJENDRAN PILLAI,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOLLAM, KOLLAM

In the result the appeals for AYs 2012-13 to 2017-18 stand partly allowed whereas the appeal for AY 2018-19 stands allowed on legal grounds in terms of our above order

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, J.M. & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, A.M.

Section 10(26) of the Act. Certain discrepancies and mismatch in signatures were noted in the loan confirmation letters obtained from loan creditors. The funds were also allegedly utilized for making payment to contractors, payment for civil work etc. for the group concerns. Some of the funds were transferred to bank accounts of family members, friends and relatives etc. whereas

M.K RAJENDRAN PILLAI,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOLLAM, KOLLAM

In the result the appeals for AYs 2012-13 to 2017-18 stand partly allowed whereas the appeal for AY 2018-19 stands allowed on legal grounds in terms of our above order

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, J.M. & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, A.M.

Section 10(26) of the Act. Certain discrepancies and mismatch in signatures were noted in the loan confirmation letters obtained from loan creditors. The funds were also allegedly utilized for making payment to contractors, payment for civil work etc. for the group concerns. Some of the funds were transferred to bank accounts of family members, friends and relatives etc. whereas

KK LEISURE & TOURISM INTERNATIONAL (P) LTD,KANNUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2 , KOZHIKODE

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed, and it’s stay applications dismissed as infructuous

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

reassess total income of such other person of such assessment year in the manner provided in section 153A. 4.3 The law in the matter, which would therefore need to be applied, is by now well-settled per a series of decisions by the Hon'ble Apex Court, viz., Super Malls Pvt. Ltd. v. Pr.CIT

KK LEISURE & TOURISM INTERNATIONAL (P) LTD,KANNUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed, and it’s stay applications dismissed as infructuous

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

reassess total income of such other person of such assessment year in the manner provided in section 153A. 4.3 The law in the matter, which would therefore need to be applied, is by now well-settled per a series of decisions by the Hon'ble Apex Court, viz., Super Malls Pvt. Ltd. v. Pr.CIT

KK LEISURE & TOURISM INTERNATIONAL (P) LTD,KANNUR vs. THE DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed, and it’s stay applications dismissed as infructuous

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

reassess total income of such other person of such assessment year in the manner provided in section 153A. 4.3 The law in the matter, which would therefore need to be applied, is by now well-settled per a series of decisions by the Hon'ble Apex Court, viz., Super Malls Pvt. Ltd. v. Pr.CIT

KK MOHANDAS,KANNUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Inturi Ramarao, Am& Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

153D of the Act from JCIT, Central Range, Kochi. In the absence of any material to the contrary, it is presumed that the statutory authorities have acted bonafide and lawfully. Therefore, the ratio of the decision of Hon’ble Orissa High Court in the case of M/s Serajuddin& Co. (supra) cannot be applied to the facts of the present case

KK MOHANDAS,KANNUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Inturi Ramarao, Am& Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

153D of the Act from JCIT, Central Range, Kochi. In the absence of any material to the contrary, it is presumed that the statutory authorities have acted bonafide and lawfully. Therefore, the ratio of the decision of Hon’ble Orissa High Court in the case of M/s Serajuddin& Co. (supra) cannot be applied to the facts of the present case

K.K.RADHAKRISHNAN,KANNUR vs. DCIT, KOZHIKKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

153D of the Act from JCIT, Central Range, Kochi. In the absence of any material to the contrary, it is presumed that the statutory authorities have acted bonafide and lawfully. Therefore, the ratio of the decision of Hon’ble Orissa High Court in the case of M/s Serajuddin & Co. (supra) cannot be applied to the facts of the present case

KK MOHANDAS,KANNUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Inturi Ramarao, Am& Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

153D of the Act from JCIT, Central Range, Kochi. In the absence of any material to the contrary, it is presumed that the statutory authorities have acted bonafide and lawfully. Therefore, the ratio of the decision of Hon’ble Orissa High Court in the case of M/s Serajuddin& Co. (supra) cannot be applied to the facts of the present case

KK MOHANDAS,KANNUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Inturi Ramarao, Am& Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

153D of the Act from JCIT, Central Range, Kochi. In the absence of any material to the contrary, it is presumed that the statutory authorities have acted bonafide and lawfully. Therefore, the ratio of the decision of Hon’ble Orissa High Court in the case of M/s Serajuddin& Co. (supra) cannot be applied to the facts of the present case

K.K.BUILDERS,KANNUR vs. DCIT, KOZHIKKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

153D of the Act from JCIT, Central Range, Kochi. In the absence of any material to the contrary, it is presumed that the statutory authorities have acted bonafide and lawfully. Therefore, the ratio of the decision of Hon’ble Orissa High Court in the case of M/s Serajuddin & Co. (supra) cannot 8 ITA Nos. 235-237/Coch/2023 K.K. Builders

K.K.BUILDERS,KANNUR vs. DCIT, KOZHIKKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

153D of the Act from JCIT, Central Range, Kochi. In the absence of any material to the contrary, it is presumed that the statutory authorities have acted bonafide and lawfully. Therefore, the ratio of the decision of Hon’ble Orissa High Court in the case of M/s Serajuddin & Co. (supra) cannot 8 ITA Nos. 235-237/Coch/2023 K.K. Builders

K.K.BUILDERS,KANNUR vs. DCIT, KOZHIKKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

153D of the Act from JCIT, Central Range, Kochi. In the absence of any material to the contrary, it is presumed that the statutory authorities have acted bonafide and lawfully. Therefore, the ratio of the decision of Hon’ble Orissa High Court in the case of M/s Serajuddin & Co. (supra) cannot 8 ITA Nos. 235-237/Coch/2023 K.K. Builders

K.K.RADHAKRISHNAN,KANNUR vs. DCIT, KOZHIKKODE

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

153D of the Act from JCIT, Central Range, Kochi. In the absence of any material to the contrary, it is presumed that the statutory authorities have acted bonafide and lawfully. Therefore, the ratio of the decision of Hon'ble Orissa High Court in the case of M/s Serajuddin & Co. (supra) cannot be applied to the facts of the present case

KK RADHAKRISHNAN,KANNUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOZHIKODE

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

153D of the Act from JCIT, Central Range, Kochi. In the absence of any material to the contrary, it is presumed that the statutory authorities have acted bonafide and lawfully. Therefore, the ratio of the decision of Hon'ble Orissa High Court in the case of M/s Serajuddin & Co. (supra) cannot be applied to the facts of the present case