BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

21 results for “reassessment”+ Section 152clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi424Mumbai248Chennai133Jaipur124Bangalore86Kolkata42Amritsar41Raipur39Ahmedabad29Rajkot29Guwahati28Pune28Lucknow27Indore27Chandigarh26Telangana26Cochin21Nagpur21Hyderabad19Cuttack14Jodhpur10Visakhapatnam10Surat10Allahabad5Karnataka4Agra4Orissa4SC2Patna2Ranchi2Rajasthan2Jabalpur2Calcutta1Panaji1

Key Topics

Addition to Income21Exemption13Section 80H5Section 271(1)(c)2Section 80I2

M/S. MATHA ENTERPRISES,,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 303/COCH/2010[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

reassess total income of these six years. In this respect also, the word used is 'shall' and, therefore, the Assessing Officer has no option but to assess or reassess the total income of these six years. The pending proceedings shall abate. This means that out of six years, if any assessment or reassessment is pending on the date of initiation

M/S BEST BAKERY & ICE CREAM PARLOUR,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 509/COCH/2010[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

Showing 1–20 of 21 · Page 1 of 2

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

reassess total income of these six years. In this respect also, the word used is 'shall' and, therefore, the Assessing Officer has no option but to assess or reassess the total income of these six years. The pending proceedings shall abate. This means that out of six years, if any assessment or reassessment is pending on the date of initiation

DCIT, ERNAKULAM vs. MATHA ENTERPRISES, ANGAMALLY

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 269/COCH/2010[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

reassess total income of these six years. In this respect also, the word used is 'shall' and, therefore, the Assessing Officer has no option but to assess or reassess the total income of these six years. The pending proceedings shall abate. This means that out of six years, if any assessment or reassessment is pending on the date of initiation

M/S. MATHA ENTERPRISES,,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 304/COCH/2010[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

reassess total income of these six years. In this respect also, the word used is 'shall' and, therefore, the Assessing Officer has no option but to assess or reassess the total income of these six years. The pending proceedings shall abate. This means that out of six years, if any assessment or reassessment is pending on the date of initiation

M/S BEST BAKERY & ICE CREAM PARLOUR,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 507/COCH/2010[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

reassess total income of these six years. In this respect also, the word used is 'shall' and, therefore, the Assessing Officer has no option but to assess or reassess the total income of these six years. The pending proceedings shall abate. This means that out of six years, if any assessment or reassessment is pending on the date of initiation

M/S BEST BAKERY & ICE CREAM PARLOUR,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 513/COCH/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

reassess total income of these six years. In this respect also, the word used is 'shall' and, therefore, the Assessing Officer has no option but to assess or reassess the total income of these six years. The pending proceedings shall abate. This means that out of six years, if any assessment or reassessment is pending on the date of initiation

M/S. MATHA ENTERPRISES,,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 308/COCH/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

reassess total income of these six years. In this respect also, the word used is 'shall' and, therefore, the Assessing Officer has no option but to assess or reassess the total income of these six years. The pending proceedings shall abate. This means that out of six years, if any assessment or reassessment is pending on the date of initiation

SHRI.PRAKASH R. NAIR,KOLLAM vs. DCIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 141/COCH/2021[2000-2001]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2024AY 2000-2001

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Dasprakash R. Nair Dy.Cit, Central Circle Prop. Dhanya Foods Kollam Kochuppilammoodu Vs. Kollam 691001 [Pan:Abfpn4424P] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 143(1)Section 148(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 80Section 801A(9)Section 80HSection 80I

reassessment. The same would: (a) prove that the omission has no bearing on the valuation of closing stock; and (b) that the goods sold at low rates were also, similarly, purchased at a lower price, proving the assessee’s case of the said sale being, as stated, of low grade varieties. Though, surely, it would still be at a loss

SRI.R.PRAKASH,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 42/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

152 DTR 215 (Kol) (Trib.) and in the case of Flipkart India (P) Ltd. vs. ACIT (2018) 193 TTJ (Bang.) 685. The Ld. AR relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT & ANR vs. Glaxo Smithkline Asia (P) Ltd. (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113 (2018) 168 DTR (Mumbai) (Trib.) 161 wherein it was held that

SRI.R. PRATAP,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 37/COCH/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

152 DTR 215 (Kol) (Trib.) and in the case of Flipkart India (P) Ltd. vs. ACIT (2018) 193 TTJ (Bang.) 685. The Ld. AR relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT & ANR vs. Glaxo Smithkline Asia (P) Ltd. (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113 (2018) 168 DTR (Mumbai) (Trib.) 161 wherein it was held that

SRI.R.PRAKASH,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 43/COCH/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

152 DTR 215 (Kol) (Trib.) and in the case of Flipkart India (P) Ltd. vs. ACIT (2018) 193 TTJ (Bang.) 685. The Ld. AR relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT & ANR vs. Glaxo Smithkline Asia (P) Ltd. (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113 (2018) 168 DTR (Mumbai) (Trib.) 161 wherein it was held that

SMT. T.C. USHA,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 45/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

152 DTR 215 (Kol) (Trib.) and in the case of Flipkart India (P) Ltd. vs. ACIT (2018) 193 TTJ (Bang.) 685. The Ld. AR relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT & ANR vs. Glaxo Smithkline Asia (P) Ltd. (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113 (2018) 168 DTR (Mumbai) (Trib.) 161 wherein it was held that

SRI.R. PRATAP,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 38/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

152 DTR 215 (Kol) (Trib.) and in the case of Flipkart India (P) Ltd. vs. ACIT (2018) 193 TTJ (Bang.) 685. The Ld. AR relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT & ANR vs. Glaxo Smithkline Asia (P) Ltd. (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113 (2018) 168 DTR (Mumbai) (Trib.) 161 wherein it was held that

SRI.R.PRAKASH,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 41/COCH/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

152 DTR 215 (Kol) (Trib.) and in the case of Flipkart India (P) Ltd. vs. ACIT (2018) 193 TTJ (Bang.) 685. The Ld. AR relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT & ANR vs. Glaxo Smithkline Asia (P) Ltd. (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113 (2018) 168 DTR (Mumbai) (Trib.) 161 wherein it was held that

M/S. VIJAYALAXMICASHEW CO.,,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 47/COCH/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

152 DTR 215 (Kol) (Trib.) and in the case of Flipkart India (P) Ltd. vs. ACIT (2018) 193 TTJ (Bang.) 685. The Ld. AR relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT & ANR vs. Glaxo Smithkline Asia (P) Ltd. (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113 (2018) 168 DTR (Mumbai) (Trib.) 161 wherein it was held that

M/S. VIJAYALAXMICASHEW CO.,,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 48/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

152 DTR 215 (Kol) (Trib.) and in the case of Flipkart India (P) Ltd. vs. ACIT (2018) 193 TTJ (Bang.) 685. The Ld. AR relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT & ANR vs. Glaxo Smithkline Asia (P) Ltd. (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113 (2018) 168 DTR (Mumbai) (Trib.) 161 wherein it was held that

SMT. T.C. USHA,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 44/COCH/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

152 DTR 215 (Kol) (Trib.) and in the case of Flipkart India (P) Ltd. vs. ACIT (2018) 193 TTJ (Bang.) 685. The Ld. AR relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT & ANR vs. Glaxo Smithkline Asia (P) Ltd. (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113 (2018) 168 DTR (Mumbai) (Trib.) 161 wherein it was held that

M/S. VIJAYALAXMICASHEW CO.,,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 49/COCH/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

152 DTR 215 (Kol) (Trib.) and in the case of Flipkart India (P) Ltd. vs. ACIT (2018) 193 TTJ (Bang.) 685. The Ld. AR relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT & ANR vs. Glaxo Smithkline Asia (P) Ltd. (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113 (2018) 168 DTR (Mumbai) (Trib.) 161 wherein it was held that

SRI.R.PRAKASH,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 40/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

152 DTR 215 (Kol) (Trib.) and in the case of Flipkart India (P) Ltd. vs. ACIT (2018) 193 TTJ (Bang.) 685. The Ld. AR relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT & ANR vs. Glaxo Smithkline Asia (P) Ltd. (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113 (2018) 168 DTR (Mumbai) (Trib.) 161 wherein it was held that

SRI.K.RAVINDRANATHAN NAIR,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 46/COCH/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

152 DTR 215 (Kol) (Trib.) and in the case of Flipkart India (P) Ltd. vs. ACIT (2018) 193 TTJ (Bang.) 685. The Ld. AR relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT & ANR vs. Glaxo Smithkline Asia (P) Ltd. (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113 (2018) 168 DTR (Mumbai) (Trib.) 161 wherein it was held that