BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “reassessment”+ Section 129clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi421Mumbai277Bangalore166Chennai143Jaipur122Ahmedabad94Kolkata56Indore49Raipur48Pune48Cuttack35Telangana33Rajkot27Patna23Lucknow22Jodhpur21Guwahati20Chandigarh17Amritsar16Nagpur15Surat14Visakhapatnam12Hyderabad11Karnataka10Cochin8SC4Allahabad4Orissa4Calcutta3Kerala3Agra2Rajasthan2Ranchi2Varanasi2Panaji1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 153C28Section 10A24Section 10B20Section 14712Section 153A8Section 143(3)8Section 1488Section 1324Addition to Income4Undisclosed Income

SRI.PELEXY K. VARGHESE,MUVATTUPUZHA vs. THE DCIT, COCHIN

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 276/COCH/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 153C(1)

reassess income of such other person in accordance with the provisions of section 153A." It was submitted that the Assessment Orders passed against the assessee also does not refer to any undisclosed income of the assessee discovered or as belonging to the assessee. In the absence of such evidence of undisclosed income of the appellant, the Assessment Order is illegal

SRI.PELEXY K. VARGHESE,MUVATTUPUZHA vs. THE DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

4
Deduction4
Reassessment4
ITA 270/COCH/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 153C(1)

reassess income of such other person in accordance with the provisions of section 153A." It was submitted that the Assessment Orders passed against the assessee also does not refer to any undisclosed income of the assessee discovered or as belonging to the assessee. In the absence of such evidence of undisclosed income of the appellant, the Assessment Order is illegal

SRI.PELEXY K. VARGHESE,MUVATTUPUZHA vs. THE DCIT, COCHIN

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 274/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 153C(1)

reassess income of such other person in accordance with the provisions of section 153A." It was submitted that the Assessment Orders passed against the assessee also does not refer to any undisclosed income of the assessee discovered or as belonging to the assessee. In the absence of such evidence of undisclosed income of the appellant, the Assessment Order is illegal

SRI.PELEXY K. VARGHESE,MUVATTUPUZHA vs. THE DCIT, COCHIN

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 275/COCH/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 153C(1)

reassess income of such other person in accordance with the provisions of section 153A." It was submitted that the Assessment Orders passed against the assessee also does not refer to any undisclosed income of the assessee discovered or as belonging to the assessee. In the absence of such evidence of undisclosed income of the appellant, the Assessment Order is illegal

KRYTHIUM SOLUTIONS P.LTD,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 161/COCH/2020[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Jul 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri.Raja Kannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Mritunjaya Sharma, Sr.DR
Section 109ASection 10ASection 10BSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

129 (C). The decision of the High Court of Delhi came subsequent to completion of scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3), and therefore cannot be the ground/reason for re-opening of the assessment. The re-assessment made under Section 147 will be invalid, if the assessing authority allowed the claim after verification of the records, under the scrutiny assessment under

KRYTHIUM SOLUTIONS P.LTD,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 163/COCH/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Jul 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri.Raja Kannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Mritunjaya Sharma, Sr.DR
Section 109ASection 10ASection 10BSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

129 (C). The decision of the High Court of Delhi came subsequent to completion of scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3), and therefore cannot be the ground/reason for re-opening of the assessment. The re-assessment made under Section 147 will be invalid, if the assessing authority allowed the claim after verification of the records, under the scrutiny assessment under

KRYTHIUM SOLUTIONS P.LTD,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 162/COCH/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Jul 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri.Raja Kannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Mritunjaya Sharma, Sr.DR
Section 109ASection 10ASection 10BSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

129 (C). The decision of the High Court of Delhi came subsequent to completion of scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3), and therefore cannot be the ground/reason for re-opening of the assessment. The re-assessment made under Section 147 will be invalid, if the assessing authority allowed the claim after verification of the records, under the scrutiny assessment under

KRYTHIUM SOLUTIONS P.LTD,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 164/COCH/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Jul 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri.Raja Kannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Mritunjaya Sharma, Sr.DR
Section 109ASection 10ASection 10BSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

129 (C). The decision of the High Court of Delhi came subsequent to completion of scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3), and therefore cannot be the ground/reason for re-opening of the assessment. The re-assessment made under Section 147 will be invalid, if the assessing authority allowed the claim after verification of the records, under the scrutiny assessment under