BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

244 results for “reassessment”+ Section 11(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,116Mumbai4,461Chennai1,435Bangalore1,285Kolkata985Jaipur881Ahmedabad837Hyderabad737Pune600Raipur478Chandigarh427Surat350Indore315Visakhapatnam281Amritsar278Rajkot248Cochin244Cuttack210Karnataka160Nagpur134Agra129Patna127Guwahati121Lucknow108Ranchi89Dehradun87Telangana80Jodhpur64Allahabad50SC43Panaji32Calcutta17Orissa14Jabalpur13Kerala11Rajasthan10Varanasi8Gauhati3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Himachal Pradesh2Punjab & Haryana2Uttarakhand1J&K1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Madhya Pradesh1

Key Topics

Addition to Income75Section 143(3)72Section 153A62Section 153C61Section 13249Section 26342Section 14739Section 4035Section 14834Reassessment

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 256/COCH/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

6 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 under the Act and Rules, even then, it is reasonable to presume that intimation required u/s. 11 is to be furnished before the AO completes such assessment because such assessment is mandatory and without furnishing the particulars of income, the AO cannot ascertain the claim of exemption u/s. 11 of the Act. Therefore, compliance of requirement

Showing 1–20 of 244 · Page 1 of 13

...
33
Disallowance22
Deduction18

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 261/COCH/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

6 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 under the Act and Rules, even then, it is reasonable to presume that intimation required u/s. 11 is to be furnished before the AO completes such assessment because such assessment is mandatory and without furnishing the particulars of income, the AO cannot ascertain the claim of exemption u/s. 11 of the Act. Therefore, compliance of requirement

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 257/COCH/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

6 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 under the Act and Rules, even then, it is reasonable to presume that intimation required u/s. 11 is to be furnished before the AO completes such assessment because such assessment is mandatory and without furnishing the particulars of income, the AO cannot ascertain the claim of exemption u/s. 11 of the Act. Therefore, compliance of requirement

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 259/COCH/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

6 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 under the Act and Rules, even then, it is reasonable to presume that intimation required u/s. 11 is to be furnished before the AO completes such assessment because such assessment is mandatory and without furnishing the particulars of income, the AO cannot ascertain the claim of exemption u/s. 11 of the Act. Therefore, compliance of requirement

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 260/COCH/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

6 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 under the Act and Rules, even then, it is reasonable to presume that intimation required u/s. 11 is to be furnished before the AO completes such assessment because such assessment is mandatory and without furnishing the particulars of income, the AO cannot ascertain the claim of exemption u/s. 11 of the Act. Therefore, compliance of requirement

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 258/COCH/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

6 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 under the Act and Rules, even then, it is reasonable to presume that intimation required u/s. 11 is to be furnished before the AO completes such assessment because such assessment is mandatory and without furnishing the particulars of income, the AO cannot ascertain the claim of exemption u/s. 11 of the Act. Therefore, compliance of requirement

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 255/COCH/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

6 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 under the Act and Rules, even then, it is reasonable to presume that intimation required u/s. 11 is to be furnished before the AO completes such assessment because such assessment is mandatory and without furnishing the particulars of income, the AO cannot ascertain the claim of exemption u/s. 11 of the Act. Therefore, compliance of requirement

JUBILEE MISSION HOSPITAL,THRISSUR vs. THE DCIT, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 88/COCH/2022[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Sept 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Sri Surendranath Rao, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 147Section 148

6 of 19 the starting point of the reassessment proceedings now initiated as is evident from the assessment order is the return of income filed originally. The AO had no new or additional material based on which he could form a reason to believe that income had escaped assessment. The AO on a relook at the return, accounts and documents

JUBILEE MISSION HOSPITAL,THRISSUR vs. THE DCIT, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 89/COCH/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Sept 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Sri Surendranath Rao, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 147Section 148

6 of 19 the starting point of the reassessment proceedings now initiated as is evident from the assessment order is the return of income filed originally. The AO had no new or additional material based on which he could form a reason to believe that income had escaped assessment. The AO on a relook at the return, accounts and documents

JUBILEE MISSION HOSPITAL ,KAKKANAD vs. THE DCIT, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 91/COCH/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Sri Surendranath Rao, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 147Section 148

6 of 19 the starting point of the reassessment proceedings now initiated as is evident from the assessment order is the return of income filed originally. The AO had no new or additional material based on which he could form a reason to believe that income had escaped assessment. The AO on a relook at the return, accounts and documents

JUBILEE MISSION HOSPITAL.,THRISSUR vs. THE DCIT, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 90/COCH/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Sept 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Sri Surendranath Rao, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 147Section 148

6 of 19 the starting point of the reassessment proceedings now initiated as is evident from the assessment order is the return of income filed originally. The AO had no new or additional material based on which he could form a reason to believe that income had escaped assessment. The AO on a relook at the return, accounts and documents

KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), THIRUVANANHAPURAM

ITA 171/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Dijo Mathew, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 270ASection 270A(1)Section 270A(2)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 40

6) or sub-section (7), where under-reported income is in consequence of any misreporting thereof by any person, the penalty referred to in sub-section (1) shall be equal to Page 8 of 14 two hundred per cent of the amount of tax payable on under-reported income. (9) The cases of misreporting of income referred

SRI.PARAYARUKANDY VETTATH GANGADHARAN,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT CIRCLE-1(1), CALICUT

In the result, the instant appeal by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 157/COCH/2023[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Apr 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Dasparayarukandy Vettath Gangadharan Dy. Cit, Circle - 1(1) Kerala Transport Company (Decd., Calicut Vs. Represented By Lrs.) K.T.C. Building, Ymca Calicut 673001 [Pan: Adhpg8318B] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Kumar C., CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 147Section 148Section 149Section 150(1)Section 153Section 2(22)(e)Section 268A

6 Parayarukandy Vettath Gangadharan (Decd.) v. Dy. CIT the firm that he has not been heard in the matter, and that there has thus been violation of the principles of natural justice? To no answer by Shri Suresh. When the notice of hearing is issued in the name of, and served on, the firm, opportunity of hearing is thereby extended

THE CHOICE FOUNDATION,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 20/COCH/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Jan 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. K.M.JoseFor Respondent: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 11(1)(d)Section 13(8)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 2Section 2(15)Section 2(24)(ii)

6 M/s.The Choice Foundation. in computing the total income under the provisions of section 11 & 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. (iii) By virtue of section 13(8) of the Income Tax Act, the Assessing Officer had held that nothing contained in section 11 or section 12 shall operate so as to exclude any income from the total income

THE DIT ( EXEMPTION), KOCHI vs. M/S.INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION COCHIN BRANCH, COCHIN

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 507/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 Nov 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

6. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The assessee institution is registered u/s. 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 vide application dated 18/09/2007 and this registration was granted w.e.f. 31/05/2007 vide order of the CIT dated 17/03/2008. The dominant objects of the assessee institution are as follows: i) To promote and advance medical

THE ADIT ( EXEMPTION), KOCHI vs. M/S.INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION COCHIN BRANCH, COCHIN

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 327/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 Nov 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

6. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The assessee institution is registered u/s. 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 vide application dated 18/09/2007 and this registration was granted w.e.f. 31/05/2007 vide order of the CIT dated 17/03/2008. The dominant objects of the assessee institution are as follows: i) To promote and advance medical

SRI HARIKUTTAN T,KAYAMKULAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2, ALLEPPEY

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 885/COCH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Accountantmemberand Shri Manomohan Das, Judicialmember Harikuttan T. The Income Tax Officer (2) 1, Edayilaveetil Tharayil Aayakar Bhavan Njakkanal P.O., Pathiyoor Vs. Alappuzha Co0Llectorate Kayalmulam 690533 Alappuzha 688011 [Pan:Alrpt7536J] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri M.S. Venkitachalam, Ca Respondent By: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing:08.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement:03.11.2023 O R D E R Per Sanjay Arora, Am This Is An Appeal By Assessee Challenging The Confirmation Of Penalty Levied Under Section 270A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) For Assessment Year (Ay) 2017-18 Vide Order Dated 17/02/2022, By The First Appellate Authority, Being The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nfac [Cit(A)] Vide It’S Order Dated 06.07.2022. 2.1 The Brief Background Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee, A Retired Defence Personnel, Is A Registered Money Lender Under The Kerala Money Lenders Act (Kml Act), Lending Money On Interest Against Mortgage Of Loan. For The Relevant Year He Returned, Besides Pension, Income From This Business At Rs.2,05,691. On Verification, It Was Found By The Assessing Officer (Ao) That The Assessee Was Maintaining Six Bank Accounts, I.E., Three Each With Two Banks, Being South Indian Bank (Sib) & State Bank Of India (Sbi). Transactions With The Former Were Undisclosed. The Reason Explained Was That The Gold Pawned By His Customers With Him For Availing Loan, Was In Turn Mortgaged With This Bank To Source Funds For Further Lending. These

For Appellant: Shri M.S. Venkitachalam, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 148Section 270ASection 274Section 37(1)

reassessed has the effect of reducing the loss or converting such loss into income. (3) The amount of under-reported income shall be,—.. (4) – (6) (7) The penalty referred to in sub-section (1) shall be a sum equal to fifty per cent of the amount of tax payable on under-reported income. (8) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section

REENA ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS PRIVATE LTD,PANAJI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand partly

ITA 267/COCH/2021[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Jul 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri G. Surendranath Rao, CAFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Sivanandan, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 80

6 provides for various information including deductions under section 80IA. Therefore, merely because, separate schedule is provided for deductions under chapter VI-A, it cannot be construed that even in a case of filing return of income under section 153A, the appellant can make a fresh claim. Further, once the assessment is abated, the original return which has been filed

REENA ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS PRIVATE LTD,PANAJI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand partly allowed statistical purposes

ITA 269/COCH/2021[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Jul 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri G. Surendranath Rao, CAFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Sivanandan, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 80

6 provides for various information including deductions under section 80IA. Therefore, merely because, separate schedule is provided for deductions under chapter VI-A, it cannot be construed that even in a case of filing return of income under section 153A, the appellant can make a fresh claim. Further, once the assessment is abated, the original return which has been filed

REENA ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS PRIVATE LTD,PANAJI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand partly allowed statistical purposes

ITA 270/COCH/2021[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Jul 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri G. Surendranath Rao, CAFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Sivanandan, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 80

6 provides for various information including deductions under section 80IA. Therefore, merely because, separate schedule is provided for deductions under chapter VI-A, it cannot be construed that even in a case of filing return of income under section 153A, the appellant can make a fresh claim. Further, once the assessment is abated, the original return which has been filed