BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

27 results for “reassessment”+ Permanent Establishmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi595Mumbai330Chennai155Bangalore91Jaipur64Kolkata59Raipur45Amritsar37Telangana29Cochin27Ahmedabad24Cuttack17Chandigarh16Lucknow16Dehradun8Pune7Karnataka7Guwahati7Indore6Jodhpur5SC5Kerala4Hyderabad4Rajkot3Orissa3Surat3Jabalpur1Patna1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Addition to Income27Section 153A14Exemption13Section 143(3)7Section 1447Section 245C(1)7Natural Justice7Limitation/Time-bar7

SRI.R. PRATAP,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 39/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

permanent establishment under the double taxation avoidance agreement and as ruled in the second decision, the 15 I.T.A. Nos.37 to 49/Coch/2016 concept of revenue neutral cannot be applied to the case of the assessee since all the concerns of the assessee group were doing their business independently having no access with each other and the profit the assessee otherwise would

SRI.K.RAVINDRANATHAN NAIR,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 46/COCH/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

permanent establishment under the double taxation avoidance agreement and as ruled in the second decision, the 15 I.T.A. Nos.37 to 49/Coch/2016 concept of revenue neutral cannot be applied to the case of the assessee since all the concerns of the assessee group were doing their business independently having no access with each other and the profit the assessee otherwise would

Showing 1–20 of 27 · Page 1 of 2

SRI.R. PRATAP,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 37/COCH/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

permanent establishment under the double taxation avoidance agreement and as ruled in the second decision, the 15 I.T.A. Nos.37 to 49/Coch/2016 concept of revenue neutral cannot be applied to the case of the assessee since all the concerns of the assessee group were doing their business independently having no access with each other and the profit the assessee otherwise would

SRI.R. PRATAP,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 38/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

permanent establishment under the double taxation avoidance agreement and as ruled in the second decision, the 15 I.T.A. Nos.37 to 49/Coch/2016 concept of revenue neutral cannot be applied to the case of the assessee since all the concerns of the assessee group were doing their business independently having no access with each other and the profit the assessee otherwise would

SRI.R.PRAKASH,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 41/COCH/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

permanent establishment under the double taxation avoidance agreement and as ruled in the second decision, the 15 I.T.A. Nos.37 to 49/Coch/2016 concept of revenue neutral cannot be applied to the case of the assessee since all the concerns of the assessee group were doing their business independently having no access with each other and the profit the assessee otherwise would

SRI.R.PRAKASH,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 42/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

permanent establishment under the double taxation avoidance agreement and as ruled in the second decision, the 15 I.T.A. Nos.37 to 49/Coch/2016 concept of revenue neutral cannot be applied to the case of the assessee since all the concerns of the assessee group were doing their business independently having no access with each other and the profit the assessee otherwise would

SRI.R.PRAKASH,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 43/COCH/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

permanent establishment under the double taxation avoidance agreement and as ruled in the second decision, the 15 I.T.A. Nos.37 to 49/Coch/2016 concept of revenue neutral cannot be applied to the case of the assessee since all the concerns of the assessee group were doing their business independently having no access with each other and the profit the assessee otherwise would

SMT. T.C. USHA,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 44/COCH/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

permanent establishment under the double taxation avoidance agreement and as ruled in the second decision, the 15 I.T.A. Nos.37 to 49/Coch/2016 concept of revenue neutral cannot be applied to the case of the assessee since all the concerns of the assessee group were doing their business independently having no access with each other and the profit the assessee otherwise would

M/S. VIJAYALAXMICASHEW CO.,,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 49/COCH/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

permanent establishment under the double taxation avoidance agreement and as ruled in the second decision, the 15 I.T.A. Nos.37 to 49/Coch/2016 concept of revenue neutral cannot be applied to the case of the assessee since all the concerns of the assessee group were doing their business independently having no access with each other and the profit the assessee otherwise would

SRI.R.PRAKASH,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 40/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

permanent establishment under the double taxation avoidance agreement and as ruled in the second decision, the 15 I.T.A. Nos.37 to 49/Coch/2016 concept of revenue neutral cannot be applied to the case of the assessee since all the concerns of the assessee group were doing their business independently having no access with each other and the profit the assessee otherwise would

M/S. VIJAYALAXMICASHEW CO.,,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 47/COCH/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

permanent establishment under the double taxation avoidance agreement and as ruled in the second decision, the 15 I.T.A. Nos.37 to 49/Coch/2016 concept of revenue neutral cannot be applied to the case of the assessee since all the concerns of the assessee group were doing their business independently having no access with each other and the profit the assessee otherwise would

M/S. VIJAYALAXMICASHEW CO.,,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 48/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

permanent establishment under the double taxation avoidance agreement and as ruled in the second decision, the 15 I.T.A. Nos.37 to 49/Coch/2016 concept of revenue neutral cannot be applied to the case of the assessee since all the concerns of the assessee group were doing their business independently having no access with each other and the profit the assessee otherwise would

SMT. T.C. USHA,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 45/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

permanent establishment under the double taxation avoidance agreement and as ruled in the second decision, the 15 I.T.A. Nos.37 to 49/Coch/2016 concept of revenue neutral cannot be applied to the case of the assessee since all the concerns of the assessee group were doing their business independently having no access with each other and the profit the assessee otherwise would

M/S. MATHA ENTERPRISES,,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 304/COCH/2010[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

established that Kwality Restaurant was earlier run by one Mr. Prasi Paul and later on M/s.Best Bakery & Ice Cream Parlour. ITA Nos. 302 to 308/Coch/2010 & 269 to 275/coch/2010 M/s. Matha Enterprises. by Mr. P.P Mathai. The presumption u/s 132(4A) referred to by the Assessing officer was rebuttable and in the assessee’s case this has been duly done

M/S BEST BAKERY & ICE CREAM PARLOUR,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 509/COCH/2010[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

established that Kwality Restaurant was earlier run by one Mr. Prasi Paul and later on M/s.Best Bakery & Ice Cream Parlour. ITA Nos. 302 to 308/Coch/2010 & 269 to 275/coch/2010 M/s. Matha Enterprises. by Mr. P.P Mathai. The presumption u/s 132(4A) referred to by the Assessing officer was rebuttable and in the assessee’s case this has been duly done

DCIT, ERNAKULAM vs. MATHA ENTERPRISES, ANGAMALLY

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 269/COCH/2010[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

established that Kwality Restaurant was earlier run by one Mr. Prasi Paul and later on M/s.Best Bakery & Ice Cream Parlour. ITA Nos. 302 to 308/Coch/2010 & 269 to 275/coch/2010 M/s. Matha Enterprises. by Mr. P.P Mathai. The presumption u/s 132(4A) referred to by the Assessing officer was rebuttable and in the assessee’s case this has been duly done

M/S BEST BAKERY & ICE CREAM PARLOUR,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 507/COCH/2010[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

established that Kwality Restaurant was earlier run by one Mr. Prasi Paul and later on M/s.Best Bakery & Ice Cream Parlour. ITA Nos. 302 to 308/Coch/2010 & 269 to 275/coch/2010 M/s. Matha Enterprises. by Mr. P.P Mathai. The presumption u/s 132(4A) referred to by the Assessing officer was rebuttable and in the assessee’s case this has been duly done

M/S. MATHA ENTERPRISES,,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 303/COCH/2010[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

established that Kwality Restaurant was earlier run by one Mr. Prasi Paul and later on M/s.Best Bakery & Ice Cream Parlour. ITA Nos. 302 to 308/Coch/2010 & 269 to 275/coch/2010 M/s. Matha Enterprises. by Mr. P.P Mathai. The presumption u/s 132(4A) referred to by the Assessing officer was rebuttable and in the assessee’s case this has been duly done

M/S BEST BAKERY & ICE CREAM PARLOUR,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 513/COCH/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

established that Kwality Restaurant was earlier run by one Mr. Prasi Paul and later on M/s.Best Bakery & Ice Cream Parlour. ITA Nos. 302 to 308/Coch/2010 & 269 to 275/coch/2010 M/s. Matha Enterprises. by Mr. P.P Mathai. The presumption u/s 132(4A) referred to by the Assessing officer was rebuttable and in the assessee’s case this has been duly done

M/S. MATHA ENTERPRISES,,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 308/COCH/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

established that Kwality Restaurant was earlier run by one Mr. Prasi Paul and later on M/s.Best Bakery & Ice Cream Parlour. ITA Nos. 302 to 308/Coch/2010 & 269 to 275/coch/2010 M/s. Matha Enterprises. by Mr. P.P Mathai. The presumption u/s 132(4A) referred to by the Assessing officer was rebuttable and in the assessee’s case this has been duly done