KOYAMU KAKKAT,KOZHIKODE vs. ITO WARD 2(3), KOZHIKODE
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 716/COCH/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Nov 2025AY 2015-16
Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm Assessment Year: 2015-16 Koyamu Kakkat .......... Appellant K.K. House, Odayalathodi, Kallithodi Road Chungam, Feroke, Kozhikode 673631 [Pan: Bxypk2972H] Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3), Kozhikode ......... Respondent Assessee By: ------- None ------- Revenue By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 06.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 19.11.2025
For Appellant: ------- None -------For Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 275(1)(a)
80,500/-. While doing so, the AO made addition of Rs. 62,83,625/- on account of alleged discrepancy in the gross receipts as per Form 26AS with regard to gross receipts credited to Profit & Loss A/c.
3. Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), who vide the impugned order dismissed the appeal for non prosecution