BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 69Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur47Bangalore18Indore16Surat10Chandigarh10Pune7Ahmedabad7Mumbai6Chennai5Delhi4Cochin3Hyderabad3Allahabad2Raipur2Rajkot2Kolkata1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 684Section 270A4Section 69B3Section 2633Penalty3Addition to Income3Section 271(1)(c)2Section 271A2

M/S PAZHAYANGADI G GOLD,KANNUR vs. ITO WARD 1 & TPS, KANNUR

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 187/COCH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhailassessment Year : 2018-19 Pazhayangadi G Gold, Ito, Ward-1& Tps, Eazhome Pazhayangadi, Kannur Kannur-670303 Vs. Pan : Aaufp9485G (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Arun Raj S. Adv. For Revenue : Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, Cit-Dr (Heard In Hybrid Bench) Date Of Hearing : 25-03-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 27-05-2025 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Arun Raj S. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 270ASection 271A
Section 68
Section 69

u/s 270A was under a wrong section. The order of the AO was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Hence the order of the AO is set aside to the extent of non-initiation of penalty proceedings under the correct section. The AO is directed to pass fresh order accordingly.” Being aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before

TOWNHOMES VILLAS AND APPARTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ERNAKULAM vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 163/COCH/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 69B

section 69B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) on the Townhomes Villas and partments Pvt Ltd. reasoning that the assessee was liable for making payment of Rs.6,65,00,000/- as per the agreementwhereas the assessee has paid only Rs.3,16,00,000/- only. Accordingly, the AO was of the view that there is unaccounted payment made

TOWNHOMES VILLAS AND APARTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ERNAKULAM vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 164/COCH/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 69B

section 69B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) on the Townhomes Villas and partments Pvt Ltd. reasoning that the assessee was liable for making payment of Rs.6,65,00,000/- as per the agreementwhereas the assessee has paid only Rs.3,16,00,000/- only. Accordingly, the AO was of the view that there is unaccounted payment made