BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi191Mumbai89Calcutta38Indore31Jaipur23Chennai21Nagpur17Karnataka12Ahmedabad12Hyderabad10Cochin10Kolkata9Pune7Lucknow7Chandigarh6Bangalore6Raipur6SC5Amritsar3Allahabad3Agra3Telangana2Punjab & Haryana2Rajasthan1Kerala1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Addition to Income10Unexplained Investment9Section 133A2

SRI.O.G.SUNIL,COCHIN vs. DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 46/COCH/2014[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

260A of the Act. In such circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain these appeals. Accordingly these appeals are dismissed.” 4. Against this, the assessee filed SLP(C) No. 6512-6518/2016 dated 18.03.2016. The Supreme Court remitted the issue to the file of the Tribunal by observing as follows: “After arguing the case for some time, the learned Counsel

SRI.O.G.SUNIL,COCHIN vs. DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 47/COCH/2014[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

260A of the Act. In such circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain these appeals. Accordingly these appeals are dismissed.” 4. Against this, the assessee filed SLP(C) No. 6512-6518/2016 dated 18.03.2016. The Supreme Court remitted the issue to the file of the Tribunal by observing as follows: “After arguing the case for some time, the learned Counsel

SRI.O.G.SUNIL,COCHIN vs. DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 50/COCH/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

260A of the Act. In such circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain these appeals. Accordingly these appeals are dismissed.” 4. Against this, the assessee filed SLP(C) No. 6512-6518/2016 dated 18.03.2016. The Supreme Court remitted the issue to the file of the Tribunal by observing as follows: “After arguing the case for some time, the learned Counsel

SMT.ASHA MENON( ASHA SUNIL),COCHIN vs. THE ACIT(CEN,CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 596/COCH/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

260A of the Act. In such circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain these appeals. Accordingly these appeals are dismissed.” 4. Against this, the assessee filed SLP(C) No. 6512-6518/2016 dated 18.03.2016. The Supreme Court remitted the issue to the file of the Tribunal by observing as follows: “After arguing the case for some time, the learned Counsel

SRI.O.G.SUNIL,COCHIN vs. DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 48/COCH/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

260A of the Act. In such circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain these appeals. Accordingly these appeals are dismissed.” 4. Against this, the assessee filed SLP(C) No. 6512-6518/2016 dated 18.03.2016. The Supreme Court remitted the issue to the file of the Tribunal by observing as follows: “After arguing the case for some time, the learned Counsel

SRI.O.G.SUNIL,COCHIN vs. DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 49/COCH/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

260A of the Act. In such circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain these appeals. Accordingly these appeals are dismissed.” 4. Against this, the assessee filed SLP(C) No. 6512-6518/2016 dated 18.03.2016. The Supreme Court remitted the issue to the file of the Tribunal by observing as follows: “After arguing the case for some time, the learned Counsel

SRI.O.G.SUNIL,COCHIN vs. DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 51/COCH/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

260A of the Act. In such circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain these appeals. Accordingly these appeals are dismissed.” 4. Against this, the assessee filed SLP(C) No. 6512-6518/2016 dated 18.03.2016. The Supreme Court remitted the issue to the file of the Tribunal by observing as follows: “After arguing the case for some time, the learned Counsel

SMT.ASHA MENON( ASHA SUNIL),COCHIN vs. THE DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 594/COCH/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

260A of the Act. In such circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain these appeals. Accordingly these appeals are dismissed.” 4. Against this, the assessee filed SLP(C) No. 6512-6518/2016 dated 18.03.2016. The Supreme Court remitted the issue to the file of the Tribunal by observing as follows: “After arguing the case for some time, the learned Counsel

SMT.ASHA MENON( ASHA SUNIL),COCHIN vs. THE ACIT(CEN,CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 595/COCH/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

260A of the Act. In such circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain these appeals. Accordingly these appeals are dismissed.” 4. Against this, the assessee filed SLP(C) No. 6512-6518/2016 dated 18.03.2016. The Supreme Court remitted the issue to the file of the Tribunal by observing as follows: “After arguing the case for some time, the learned Counsel

M/S.KOTTAKKAL WOOD COMPLEX,KOTTAKKAL vs. THE ITO, TIRUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the Stay Petitions

ITA 593/COCH/2019[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Mar 2020AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 260ASection 271(1)(c)

260A of the Act, the Hon'ble Court remitted the matters to the Assessing Officer to pass fresh orders after taking into consideration the KVAT Order dated 08.08.2007. The Assessing Officer passed a consequential order to give effect to the order of the High Court. The consequential order dated 02.01.2017 is subjudice before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kozhikode