SHRI.PRAKASH R. NAIR,KOLLAM vs. DCIT, KOLLAM
In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 141/COCH/2021[2000-2001]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2024AY 2000-2001
Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Dasprakash R. Nair Dy.Cit, Central Circle Prop. Dhanya Foods Kollam Kochuppilammoodu Vs. Kollam 691001 [Pan:Abfpn4424P] (Appellant) (Respondent)
For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 143(1)Section 148(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 80Section 801A(9)Section 80HSection 80I
251 ITR 99 (SC); B.A. Balasubramaniam & Bros v. CIT [1999] 236 ITR
977 (SC), to cite some), is on the assessee who makes the claim.
6.6
Next, we consider the assessee’s legal ground, i.e., of the notice u/s. 274 not striking off one of the two limbs attracting penalty u/s. 271(1)(c), charging it therefore of being vague
