BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 220(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi369Mumbai201Karnataka99Jaipur96Indore63Bangalore60Chennai49Ahmedabad49Raipur35Pune27Kolkata23Hyderabad22Allahabad19Rajkot16Chandigarh14Lucknow13Cochin10Visakhapatnam7Dehradun7Nagpur3Cuttack3Ranchi3Guwahati2Agra2SC2Surat2Rajasthan1Varanasi1Telangana1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Addition to Income10Unexplained Investment9Section 271(1)(c)8Section 2743Section 143(3)2

SRI.O.G.SUNIL,COCHIN vs. DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 46/COCH/2014[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

220/- was returned by the Petitioner pursuant to return under Section 153A of the IT Act as against the peak of Rs. 5,36,195.99/-. The confirmation of the assessment of an income of Rs. 5,80,87,680/- is bad as the entire transactions on the basis of the bank statements have been explained j) Because

SRI.O.G.SUNIL,COCHIN vs. DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 47/COCH/2014[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

220/- was returned by the Petitioner pursuant to return under Section 153A of the IT Act as against the peak of Rs. 5,36,195.99/-. The confirmation of the assessment of an income of Rs. 5,80,87,680/- is bad as the entire transactions on the basis of the bank statements have been explained j) Because

SRI.O.G.SUNIL,COCHIN vs. DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 50/COCH/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

220/- was returned by the Petitioner pursuant to return under Section 153A of the IT Act as against the peak of Rs. 5,36,195.99/-. The confirmation of the assessment of an income of Rs. 5,80,87,680/- is bad as the entire transactions on the basis of the bank statements have been explained j) Because

SMT.ASHA MENON( ASHA SUNIL),COCHIN vs. THE ACIT(CEN,CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 596/COCH/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

220/- was returned by the Petitioner pursuant to return under Section 153A of the IT Act as against the peak of Rs. 5,36,195.99/-. The confirmation of the assessment of an income of Rs. 5,80,87,680/- is bad as the entire transactions on the basis of the bank statements have been explained j) Because

SRI.O.G.SUNIL,COCHIN vs. DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 48/COCH/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

220/- was returned by the Petitioner pursuant to return under Section 153A of the IT Act as against the peak of Rs. 5,36,195.99/-. The confirmation of the assessment of an income of Rs. 5,80,87,680/- is bad as the entire transactions on the basis of the bank statements have been explained j) Because

SRI.O.G.SUNIL,COCHIN vs. DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 49/COCH/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

220/- was returned by the Petitioner pursuant to return under Section 153A of the IT Act as against the peak of Rs. 5,36,195.99/-. The confirmation of the assessment of an income of Rs. 5,80,87,680/- is bad as the entire transactions on the basis of the bank statements have been explained j) Because

SRI.O.G.SUNIL,COCHIN vs. DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 51/COCH/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

220/- was returned by the Petitioner pursuant to return under Section 153A of the IT Act as against the peak of Rs. 5,36,195.99/-. The confirmation of the assessment of an income of Rs. 5,80,87,680/- is bad as the entire transactions on the basis of the bank statements have been explained j) Because

SMT.ASHA MENON( ASHA SUNIL),COCHIN vs. THE DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 594/COCH/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

220/- was returned by the Petitioner pursuant to return under Section 153A of the IT Act as against the peak of Rs. 5,36,195.99/-. The confirmation of the assessment of an income of Rs. 5,80,87,680/- is bad as the entire transactions on the basis of the bank statements have been explained j) Because

SMT.ASHA MENON( ASHA SUNIL),COCHIN vs. THE ACIT(CEN,CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 595/COCH/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

220/- was returned by the Petitioner pursuant to return under Section 153A of the IT Act as against the peak of Rs. 5,36,195.99/-. The confirmation of the assessment of an income of Rs. 5,80,87,680/- is bad as the entire transactions on the basis of the bank statements have been explained j) Because

RIYAS NELLIYOTE,KUTTIADI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE -2(1), KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 767/COCH/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Apr 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George George K, Vice- & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Sri.C.B.M.Warrier, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Sr.AR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 292BSection 54F

u/s. 250 of Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" hereinafter). The relevant assessment year is A.Y. 2015-2016. 2. The order of the CIT(A) arises out of the order of the Assessing Officer (“AO”) imposing penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act amounting to Rs.10,95,880. 3. The grounds raised read as follows:- 2 ITA No.767/Coch/2024. Sri.Riyas Nelliyote