ATTU PURATTU ISMAIL,THALASSERY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, , KANNUR
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed
ITA 812/COCH/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Nov 2025AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm Assessment Year: 2013-14 Attupurattu Ismail .......... Appellant Attupuratt House, Thalassesry, Kannur 670676 [Pan: Abfbi7471M] Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Kannur ......... Respondent Assessee By: Shri Ananthakrishnan R. Ca Revenue By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 07.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 19.11.2025 O R D E R Per: Inturi Rama Rao, Am This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Nfac) Dated 01.09.2025 For Assessment Year (Ay) 2013-14. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is An Individual. The Return Of Income For Ay 2013-14 Was Filed On 22.03.2014 Disclosing Total Income Of Rs. 2,63,300/-. The Search & Seizure Operations U/S. 132 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) Was Conducted In The Business Premises Of Parco Group Of Concerns
For Appellant: Shri Ananthakrishnan R. CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 132Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274
u/s.
148 of the Act. In our opinion provisions of Explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) were squarely applicable to the facts of the present case, which reads as under: -
“Failure to furnish returns, comply with notices, concealment of income, etc.
271. (1) If the Assessing Officer or the 98[Joint Commissioner
(Appeals) or the] Commissioner (Appeals
