Search: penalty u/s 271

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 144Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi668 Mumbai398 Bangalore137 Pune55 Kolkata52 Ahmedabad49 Hyderabad31 Jaipur21 Chennai20 Dehradun12 Chandigarh5 Indore5 Cuttack5 Visakhapatnam4 Rajkot3 Surat2 Cochin2 Karnataka1 Jabalpur1 Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 144C(5)2 Section 92C(2)2 Section 10B2 Transfer Pricing2 Disallowance2 Comparables/TP2

THE JT CIT, TRIVANDRUM vs. ALLIANZ CORNHILL INFORMATION SERVICES P. LTD, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the

ITA 185/COCH/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm Assessment Year : 2010-11

Section 10BSection 144C(5)Section 92C(2)

u/s. 144C(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Dispute Resolution Panel-2, Bengaluru dated 18/12/2014 and pertain to the assessment year 2010-11. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: 1 Non-allowance of prior period income in the computation of margins of the Company Relief • The Transfer Pricing Officer ("TPO") erred

M/S.ALLIANZ CORNHILL INFORMATION SERVICES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. JTCIT, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the