BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

32 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 144clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi828Mumbai702Jaipur271Indore221Ahmedabad220Surat211Kolkata175Pune155Bangalore144Chennai139Hyderabad126Raipur125Karnataka125Chandigarh115Rajkot99Lucknow91Allahabad63Amritsar49Agra48Visakhapatnam48Cuttack37Calcutta34Cochin32Nagpur31Patna29Dehradun26Jabalpur21Guwahati18Panaji13Jodhpur12Varanasi6SC5Telangana1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)39Penalty29Section 14427Addition to Income25Section 14824Section 80P22Condonation of Delay20Section 27116Section 139(1)13

THE ITO, COCHIN vs. SRI.AMBADY KRISHNA MENON, COCHIN

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and the Cross Objection filed

ITA 4/COCH/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Aug 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

Section itself reads as follows: "Without prejudice to the power conferred on him by any other provisions of this Act, the Commissioner may, on an application made in this behalf by an assessee, and after recording his reasons for so doing, reduce or waive the amount of any penalty payable by the assessee under this Act, or stay; or compound

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. RAJAKUMARI SHOPPING AMALL LLP, ATTINGAL

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 32 · Page 1 of 2

Section 249(2)12
Section 13212
Disallowance6
ITA 597/COCH/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed
ITAT Cochin
29 Oct 2025
AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Anikesh Banerjee, Jm Assessment Year: 2016-17 Dcit, Central Circle .......... Appellant Aayakar Bhavan, Kawdiar, Thiruvananthapuram Vs. Rajkumari Shopping Mall Llp ......... Respondent Amc 11/556, City Plaza, Nh Road Attingal 695101 [Pan: Aaqfr1222B] Assessee By: Shri V.M. Veeramani, Ca Revenue By: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 27.10.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.10.2025

For Appellant: Shri V.M. Veeramani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 144Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 68

section 271(1)(c) of the Act, date of order 26/09/2023. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee’s case was assessed u/s 144 r.w.s. 263 of the Act, passed on 30/03/2023. The addition was confirmed u/s 68 of the Act related to unexplained credit amount to Rs.9,56,04,655/-. The Ld.AO initiated the penalty

SAI EXPORT ENTERPRISES,KOLLAM vs. ITO, WARD 1 & TPS, KOLLAM

ITA 339/COCH/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm Assessment Year: 2016-17 Sai Export Enerprises .......... Appellant Mangad P.O., Kollam 691015 [Pan: Absfs2716A] Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Wd-1 & Tpo, Kollam .......... Respondent Appellant By: Shri Rajakannan, Advocate Respondent By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 13.06.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 31.07.2025 O R D E R Per: Inturi Rama Rao, Am This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Cit(A)] Dated 31.03.2024 For Assessment Year (Ay) 2016-17. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is A Partnership Firm. It Is Engaged In The Business Of Processing & Export Of Cashew Nuts. The Return Of Income For Ay 2016-17 Was Filed On 17.02.2017 Declaring Income Of Rs. 42,15,670/-. Against The Said Return Of Income, The Assessment Was Completed By The National

For Appellant: Shri Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 3

144((13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) at a total income of Rs. 56,04,300/0. While doing so, the AO made addition of an amount of Rs. 13,88,632/- being the belated remittance of employees’ contribution to PF and ESE remitted beyond the due date specified in the respective Acts, but before the due date

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 168/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

144 19.03.2018 2010-11 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2012-13 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2013-14 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2014-15 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2015-16 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2009-10 30.11.2016 271(1)(c) 25.03.2018 2010-11 31.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2012-13 30.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2013-14 30.05.2017 271

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 171/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

144 19.03.2018 2010-11 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2012-13 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2013-14 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2014-15 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2015-16 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2009-10 30.11.2016 271(1)(c) 25.03.2018 2010-11 31.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2012-13 30.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2013-14 30.05.2017 271

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 169/COCH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

144 19.03.2018 2010-11 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2012-13 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2013-14 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2014-15 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2015-16 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2009-10 30.11.2016 271(1)(c) 25.03.2018 2010-11 31.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2012-13 30.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2013-14 30.05.2017 271

SRI VARGHESE M.UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT,CEN-CIRCLE-2, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 161/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

144 19.03.2018 2010-11 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2012-13 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2013-14 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2014-15 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2015-16 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2009-10 30.11.2016 271(1)(c) 25.03.2018 2010-11 31.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2012-13 30.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2013-14 30.05.2017 271

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 164/COCH/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

144 19.03.2018 2010-11 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2012-13 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2013-14 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2014-15 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2015-16 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2009-10 30.11.2016 271(1)(c) 25.03.2018 2010-11 31.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2012-13 30.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2013-14 30.05.2017 271

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 166/COCH/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

144 19.03.2018 2010-11 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2012-13 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2013-14 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2014-15 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2015-16 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2009-10 30.11.2016 271(1)(c) 25.03.2018 2010-11 31.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2012-13 30.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2013-14 30.05.2017 271

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 167/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

144 19.03.2018 2010-11 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2012-13 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2013-14 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2014-15 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2015-16 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2009-10 30.11.2016 271(1)(c) 25.03.2018 2010-11 31.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2012-13 30.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2013-14 30.05.2017 271

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 170/COCH/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

144 19.03.2018 2010-11 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2012-13 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2013-14 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2014-15 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2015-16 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2009-10 30.11.2016 271(1)(c) 25.03.2018 2010-11 31.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2012-13 30.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2013-14 30.05.2017 271

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 172/COCH/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

144 19.03.2018 2010-11 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2012-13 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2013-14 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2014-15 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2015-16 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2009-10 30.11.2016 271(1)(c) 25.03.2018 2010-11 31.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2012-13 30.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2013-14 30.05.2017 271

SRI VARGHESE M.UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT,CEN-CIRCLE-2, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 162/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

144 19.03.2018 2010-11 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2012-13 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2013-14 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2014-15 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2015-16 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2009-10 30.11.2016 271(1)(c) 25.03.2018 2010-11 31.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2012-13 30.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2013-14 30.05.2017 271

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 163/COCH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

144 19.03.2018 2010-11 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2012-13 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2013-14 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2014-15 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2015-16 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2009-10 30.11.2016 271(1)(c) 25.03.2018 2010-11 31.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2012-13 30.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2013-14 30.05.2017 271

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 165/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

144 19.03.2018 2010-11 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2012-13 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 20.03.2018 2013-14 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2014-15 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2015-16 30.11.2016 153A r.w.s.144 21.03.2018 2009-10 30.11.2016 271(1)(c) 25.03.2018 2010-11 31.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2012-13 30.05.2017 271(1)(c) 26.03.2018 2013-14 30.05.2017 271

JOMON JOHN,BAZAR vs. I. T. O, WARD 2, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 578/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI KESHAV DUBEY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 250Section 271Section 272A(1)(d)Section 274

144 of the Act, the penalty u/s. 271 (1)(d) should not be levied. 8. The ld. DR on the other hand supported the orders of the authorities below. 9. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. It is an undisputed fact that the AO has passed the assessment order u/s

CHRISTUDANAM YASSAYA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. ITO, WARD 1(1), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 840/COCH/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Feb 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am Assessment Year: 2011-12 Christudanam Yassaya .......... Appellant Bathel Kp 17A Maruthoor, Vattapara P.O. Thiruvananthapuram 695028 [Pan: Acmpy4412C] Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1) .......... Respondent Aayakar Bhavan, Kowdiar Thiruvananthapuram 695003

For Appellant: ------- None -------For Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 139(1)Section 142Section 144Section 148Section 264Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

144 r.w.s. 264 on 29.11.2019 at a total income of Rs. 38,32,110/-. 3. The appellant, in response to the show cause notice u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act, could not file original return of income as he was under treatment for psychological issues. However, the AO rejected the above explanation and proceeded with levy of penalty

SRI.V.I. GEORGE KUTTY,KOLLAM vs. THE ITO,, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 106/COCH/2021[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Nov 2021AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George Mathan, Jm

For Appellant: Shri T.M. Sreedharan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 148Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 271 (1)(c) of the Income Tax Act 1961. The assessment years involved are 2003-04 and 2004-05. Penalty is imposed for the above years by separate orders dated 28th September 2012 for both the assessments. Following are the penalties imposed. 2003-04 - Rs.4,75,540/- 2004-05 - Rs.2,90,630/- 2. For the corresponding assessment years, assessments

SRI.V.I. GEORGE KUTTY,KOLLAM vs. THE ITO,, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 107/COCH/2021[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Nov 2021AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George Mathan, Jm

For Appellant: Shri T.M. Sreedharan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 148Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

section 271 (1)(c) of the Income Tax Act 1961. The assessment years involved are 2003-04 and 2004-05. Penalty is imposed for the above years by separate orders dated 28th September 2012 for both the assessments. Following are the penalties imposed. 2003-04 - Rs.4,75,540/- 2004-05 - Rs.2,90,630/- 2. For the corresponding assessment years, assessments

THE JT CIT, TRIVANDRUM vs. ALLIANZ CORNHILL INFORMATION SERVICES P. LTD, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the

ITA 185/COCH/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm Assessment Year : 2010-11

Section 10BSection 144C(5)Section 92C(2)

penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)© of the Act. Relief 6 & 185/Coch/2015 12. The Assessee prays that the Assessing Officer be directed to grant all such relief arising from the proceeding grounds as also all relief consequential thereof. The Appellant craves leave to add to or alter, by deletion, substitution, modification or otherwise, the above grounds of appeal, either before