BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 131(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai556Delhi489Jaipur184Ahmedabad134Bangalore119Kolkata102Karnataka100Chennai70Indore66Raipur43Hyderabad43Pune40Calcutta34Chandigarh26Rajkot24Lucknow22Nagpur21Surat20Visakhapatnam17Kerala14Panaji13Allahabad9Jabalpur9Guwahati9Agra5Cuttack3Cochin3Rajasthan2Jodhpur2SC2Telangana2

Key Topics

Section 27110Section 271D6Section 2636Section 274Section 143(3)3Section 56(2)(viib)3Section 271E2Penalty2Limitation/Time-bar

THE SULTHAN BATHERY SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,WAYANAD vs. THE JCIT RANGE 2, KOZHIKODE

In the result, both the appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 320/COCH/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Anil D. Nair, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, D.R
Section 27Section 271Section 271DSection 271E

D E R PERSOUNDARARAJAN K., JUDICIAL MEMBER: These appeals by assessee are directed against different orders of CIT(A) for the assessment year 2015-16 both are having common date 9.3.2023 with regard to levy of penalty u/s 271D & 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “The Act”). The assessee also filed stay petitions with SP Nos.105

2

THE SULTHAN BATHERY SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,WAYANAD vs. THE JCIT RANGE 2, KOZHIKODE

In the result, both the appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 319/COCH/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Anil D. Nair, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, D.R
Section 27Section 271Section 271DSection 271E

D E R PERSOUNDARARAJAN K., JUDICIAL MEMBER: These appeals by assessee are directed against different orders of CIT(A) for the assessment year 2015-16 both are having common date 9.3.2023 with regard to levy of penalty u/s 271D & 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “The Act”). The assessee also filed stay petitions with SP Nos.105

M/S.SAHYADRI AGENCIES LTD,KANDNASSERY, THRISSUR vs. THE ITO, WD-1(3), THRISSUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 439/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin05 Nov 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Bomi Daruwala, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 56(2)(viib)Section 68

D E R Per George George K, JM This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against CIT’s order dated 29.03.2019 passed u/s 263 of the I.T.Act. The relevant assessment year is 2014-2015. 2. The grounds raised read as follows:- “1. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the order passed