Search: penalty u/s 271

6 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 12Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Hyderabad33 Bangalore32 Delhi29 Mumbai24 Jaipur13 Visakhapatnam12 Indore8 Allahabad8 Lucknow8 Pune7 Cochin6 Patna4 Amritsar4 Chandigarh4 Ahmedabad3 Kolkata2 Raipur2 Jodhpur2 Nagpur1 Rajkot1 Surat1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)8 Section 282(1)8 Exemption6 Penalty6 Addition to Income6 Section 44A4 Section 12A(1)(b)4 Section 139(1)4 Section 144

SHALOM CHARITABLE MINISTRIES OF INDIA,PALAKKAD vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), THRISSUR

ITA 545/COCH/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Sept 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. DR

Section 12A(1)(b)Section 14Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 44A

section 44AB is to compute proper taxable income and that purpose is achieved to a larger extent by the audit performed u/s. 12A(1)(b) of the Act. 6) For these amongst other grounds that may be permitted to be raised and additional evidences adduced at the time of hearing or before and it is prayed that justice be done

SHALOM CHARITABLE MINISTRIES OF INDIA,PALAKKAD vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), THRISSUR

SHALOM CHARITABLE MINISTRIES OF INDIA,PALAKKAD vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), THRISSUR

SHALOM CHARITABLE MINISTRIES OF INDIA,PALAKKAD vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), THRISSUR

MUDIYILATHU RADHAKRISHNAKURUP RESMIKALA,CHENGANNOOR vs. ITO, WARD-2, THIRUVALLA, THIRUVALLA

MUDIYILATHU RADHAKRISHNAKURUP RESMIKALA,CHENGANNOOR vs. ITO, WARD-2, THIRUVALLA, THIRUVALLA

MUDIYILATHU RADHAKRISHNAKURUP RESMIKALA,CHENGANNOOR vs. ITO, WARD-2, THIRUVALLA, THIRUVALLA

MUDIYILATHU RADHAKRISHNAKURUP RESMIKALA,CHENGANNOOR vs. ITO, WARD-2, THIRUVALLA, THIRUVALLA