Search: penalty u/s 271

6 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 127clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)8 Section 282(1)8 Penalty6 Addition to Income6 Section 2634 Section 139(1)4 Section 1444 Section 271(1)4 Section 12A(1)(ac)

M/S.SOORYA DRUG HOUSE,THODUPUZHA vs. THE ITO,WD-2, THODUPUZHA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 236/COCH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 Aug 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Mathew JosephFor Respondent: Sri.Shantom Bose

Section 133ASection 143Section 143(1)Section 148Section 153Section 263Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

127/- which comprised of disallowance of salary, estimated personal use of car and the defect in accounting sales. The appellant has neither concealed particulars of such income nor furnished inaccurate particulars of such income in the returns filed. Hence it is not a fit case to impose penalty and the order of dropping the penalty proceedings is not erroneous. Ground

M/S.SOORYA DRUG HOUSE,THODUPUZHA vs. THE ITO,WD-2, THODUPUZHA

M/S.SOORYA DRUG HOUSE,THODUPUZHA vs. THE ITO,WD-2, THODUPUZHA

M/S.SOORYA DRUG HOUSE,THODUPUZHA vs. THE ITO,WD-2, THODUPUZHA

MUDIYILATHU RADHAKRISHNAKURUP RESMIKALA,CHENGANNOOR vs. ITO, WARD-2, THIRUVALLA, THIRUVALLA

MUDIYILATHU RADHAKRISHNAKURUP RESMIKALA,CHENGANNOOR vs. ITO, WARD-2, THIRUVALLA, THIRUVALLA

MUDIYILATHU RADHAKRISHNAKURUP RESMIKALA,CHENGANNOOR vs. ITO, WARD-2, THIRUVALLA, THIRUVALLA

MUDIYILATHU RADHAKRISHNAKURUP RESMIKALA,CHENGANNOOR vs. ITO, WARD-2, THIRUVALLA, THIRUVALLA