BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1 result for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 125clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai237Delhi174Chennai63Ahmedabad51Jaipur46Bangalore41Raipur38Allahabad37Ranchi35Hyderabad29Rajkot28Indore24Amritsar18Visakhapatnam17Chandigarh17Surat11Kolkata10Pune9Lucknow9Cuttack9Nagpur8Jabalpur5Patna3SC2Cochin1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 684Section 270A4Section 2633Section 271A2

M/S PAZHAYANGADI G GOLD,KANNUR vs. ITO WARD 1 & TPS, KANNUR

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 187/COCH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhailassessment Year : 2018-19 Pazhayangadi G Gold, Ito, Ward-1& Tps, Eazhome Pazhayangadi, Kannur Kannur-670303 Vs. Pan : Aaufp9485G (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Arun Raj S. Adv. For Revenue : Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, Cit-Dr (Heard In Hybrid Bench) Date Of Hearing : 25-03-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 27-05-2025 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Arun Raj S. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 270ASection 271A
Section 68
Section 69

125 ITR 373 (MP) and Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of (2005)275 ITR (All) had taken a view that non-initiation of penalty proceedings is sufficient reason for invoking provisions of section 263 of the Act. In the case of Surendra Prasad Agarwal (supra), the Hon'ble High Court had considered several decisions quoted