SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

271(l)(c), for AY I.T.A. Nos.161-172/Coch/2019 2009-10, 2010-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16, being invalid due to reasons discussed above, were thus dismissed by CIT(A). 4. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. Before us, the assessee has filed an affidavit dated 19/06/2019 stating as follows: “A search u/s

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

271(l)(c), for AY I.T.A. Nos.161-172/Coch/2019 2009-10, 2010-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16, being invalid due to reasons discussed above, were thus dismissed by CIT(A). 4. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. Before us, the assessee has filed an affidavit dated 19/06/2019 stating as follows: “A search u/s

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

271(l)(c), for AY I.T.A. Nos.161-172/Coch/2019 2009-10, 2010-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16, being invalid due to reasons discussed above, were thus dismissed by CIT(A). 4. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. Before us, the assessee has filed an affidavit dated 19/06/2019 stating as follows: “A search u/s

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

271(l)(c), for AY I.T.A. Nos.161-172/Coch/2019 2009-10, 2010-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16, being invalid due to reasons discussed above, were thus dismissed by CIT(A). 4. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. Before us, the assessee has filed an affidavit dated 19/06/2019 stating as follows: “A search u/s

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

271(l)(c), for AY I.T.A. Nos.161-172/Coch/2019 2009-10, 2010-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16, being invalid due to reasons discussed above, were thus dismissed by CIT(A). 4. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. Before us, the assessee has filed an affidavit dated 19/06/2019 stating as follows: “A search u/s

SRI VARGHESE M.UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT,CEN-CIRCLE-2, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

271(l)(c), for AY I.T.A. Nos.161-172/Coch/2019 2009-10, 2010-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16, being invalid due to reasons discussed above, were thus dismissed by CIT(A). 4. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. Before us, the assessee has filed an affidavit dated 19/06/2019 stating as follows: “A search u/s

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

271(l)(c), for AY I.T.A. Nos.161-172/Coch/2019 2009-10, 2010-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16, being invalid due to reasons discussed above, were thus dismissed by CIT(A). 4. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. Before us, the assessee has filed an affidavit dated 19/06/2019 stating as follows: “A search u/s

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

271(l)(c), for AY I.T.A. Nos.161-172/Coch/2019 2009-10, 2010-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16, being invalid due to reasons discussed above, were thus dismissed by CIT(A). 4. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. Before us, the assessee has filed an affidavit dated 19/06/2019 stating as follows: “A search u/s

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

271(l)(c), for AY I.T.A. Nos.161-172/Coch/2019 2009-10, 2010-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16, being invalid due to reasons discussed above, were thus dismissed by CIT(A). 4. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. Before us, the assessee has filed an affidavit dated 19/06/2019 stating as follows: “A search u/s

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

271(l)(c), for AY I.T.A. Nos.161-172/Coch/2019 2009-10, 2010-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16, being invalid due to reasons discussed above, were thus dismissed by CIT(A). 4. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. Before us, the assessee has filed an affidavit dated 19/06/2019 stating as follows: “A search u/s

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

271(l)(c), for AY I.T.A. Nos.161-172/Coch/2019 2009-10, 2010-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16, being invalid due to reasons discussed above, were thus dismissed by CIT(A). 4. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. Before us, the assessee has filed an affidavit dated 19/06/2019 stating as follows: “A search u/s

SHALOM CHARITABLE MINISTRIES OF INDIA,PALAKKAD vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), THRISSUR

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

trust is envisaged in section 12A(1)(b) of the Act. 4) It is submitted that micro finance activity is only a charitable activity designed in such a way that the poor sections of the society are to be benefited and to be uplifted, especially rural women who do not have substantial income. 5) Be that as it may audit

SHALOM CHARITABLE MINISTRIES OF INDIA,PALAKKAD vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), THRISSUR

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

trust is envisaged in section 12A(1)(b) of the Act. 4) It is submitted that micro finance activity is only a charitable activity designed in such a way that the poor sections of the society are to be benefited and to be uplifted, especially rural women who do not have substantial income. 5) Be that as it may audit