BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

160 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Addition to Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,414Mumbai5,172Ahmedabad1,251Kolkata1,075Jaipur939Pune892Bangalore806Chennai724Indore642Hyderabad550Surat491Chandigarh418Amritsar259Rajkot250Visakhapatnam172Raipur168Cochin160Karnataka141Lucknow140Nagpur124Cuttack112Agra107Allahabad88Dehradun79Patna79Guwahati72Jodhpur62Jabalpur51Ranchi50Calcutta38Panaji34Varanasi21Kerala15SC11Telangana8Rajasthan4Punjab & Haryana2Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)179Penalty84Addition to Income80Section 27146Section 153A39Section 27435Section 143(3)35Section 13227Section 14824Condonation of Delay

MRS. THANKAMANI VARADARAJULU,KOTTAYAM vs. THE DCIT,CEN-CIRCLE-2, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, appeals of the assesses are allowed

ITA 374/COCH/2019[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 Sept 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 271(1)

penalty of Rs 51.151/- u/s 271(1) (C) of the income Tax Act 1961 overlooking the explanations offered by the appellant. 8. The CIT (A) also should have appreciated the factual position that the major addition

THE DCIT,CEN-CIRCLE-2, KOCHI, KOCHI vs. SRI. SINKARAM M. CHETTIAR, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed

ITA 370/COCH/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 Aug 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. Nos.368-373/Coch/2017 Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2010-11 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. Shri Sinkaram Chettiar, Income-Tax, Central Circle-2, Arun Niwas, Ernakulam, Kochi. 43/986, Ayyappankavu, Ernakulam, Kochi. [Pan: Ahepm 6323R]

Showing 1–20 of 160 · Page 1 of 8

...
24
Section 14419
Cash Deposit15
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

penalty is levied u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act on the assessee to make good an omission on the part of the assessee to voluntarily disclose the income by filing return of income u/s. 139 of the Act. She submitted that the assessee has not filed the return of income u/s. 139 of the Act and deliberately concealed

THE DCIT,CEN-CIRCLE-2, KOCHI, KOCHI vs. SRI. SINKARAM M. CHETTIAR, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed

ITA 373/COCH/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 Aug 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. Nos.368-373/Coch/2017 Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2010-11 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. Shri Sinkaram Chettiar, Income-Tax, Central Circle-2, Arun Niwas, Ernakulam, Kochi. 43/986, Ayyappankavu, Ernakulam, Kochi. [Pan: Ahepm 6323R]

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

penalty is levied u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act on the assessee to make good an omission on the part of the assessee to voluntarily disclose the income by filing return of income u/s. 139 of the Act. She submitted that the assessee has not filed the return of income u/s. 139 of the Act and deliberately concealed

THE DCIT,CEN-CIRCLE-2, KOCHI, KOCHI vs. SRI. SINKARAM M. CHETTIAR, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed

ITA 372/COCH/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 Aug 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. Nos.368-373/Coch/2017 Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2010-11 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. Shri Sinkaram Chettiar, Income-Tax, Central Circle-2, Arun Niwas, Ernakulam, Kochi. 43/986, Ayyappankavu, Ernakulam, Kochi. [Pan: Ahepm 6323R]

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

penalty is levied u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act on the assessee to make good an omission on the part of the assessee to voluntarily disclose the income by filing return of income u/s. 139 of the Act. She submitted that the assessee has not filed the return of income u/s. 139 of the Act and deliberately concealed

THE DCIT,CEN-CIRCLE-2, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI.SINKARAM M.CHETTIAR, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed

ITA 369/COCH/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 Aug 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. Nos.368-373/Coch/2017 Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2010-11 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. Shri Sinkaram Chettiar, Income-Tax, Central Circle-2, Arun Niwas, Ernakulam, Kochi. 43/986, Ayyappankavu, Ernakulam, Kochi. [Pan: Ahepm 6323R]

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

penalty is levied u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act on the assessee to make good an omission on the part of the assessee to voluntarily disclose the income by filing return of income u/s. 139 of the Act. She submitted that the assessee has not filed the return of income u/s. 139 of the Act and deliberately concealed

THE DCIT,CEN-CIRCLE-2, KOCHI, KOCHI vs. SRI. SINKARAM M. CHETTIAR, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed

ITA 371/COCH/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 Aug 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. Nos.368-373/Coch/2017 Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2010-11 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. Shri Sinkaram Chettiar, Income-Tax, Central Circle-2, Arun Niwas, Ernakulam, Kochi. 43/986, Ayyappankavu, Ernakulam, Kochi. [Pan: Ahepm 6323R]

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

penalty is levied u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act on the assessee to make good an omission on the part of the assessee to voluntarily disclose the income by filing return of income u/s. 139 of the Act. She submitted that the assessee has not filed the return of income u/s. 139 of the Act and deliberately concealed

THE DCIT,CEN-CIRCLE-2, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI.SINKARAM M.CHETTIAR, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed

ITA 368/COCH/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 Aug 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. Nos.368-373/Coch/2017 Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2010-11 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. Shri Sinkaram Chettiar, Income-Tax, Central Circle-2, Arun Niwas, Ernakulam, Kochi. 43/986, Ayyappankavu, Ernakulam, Kochi. [Pan: Ahepm 6323R]

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

penalty is levied u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act on the assessee to make good an omission on the part of the assessee to voluntarily disclose the income by filing return of income u/s. 139 of the Act. She submitted that the assessee has not filed the return of income u/s. 139 of the Act and deliberately concealed

M/S.PRINCE ROLLER FLOUR MILLS P. LTD,PALAKKAD vs. THE ACIT, KOCHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the

ITA 36/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153A

Penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act were initiated separately. Accordingly, the assessment was completed as under: Income from Business[as returned] Rs.30,93,270/- Addition

THE ACIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.PRINCE ROLLER FLOUR MILLS P. LTD, PALAKKAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the

ITA 21/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153A

Penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act were initiated separately. Accordingly, the assessment was completed as under: Income from Business[as returned] Rs.30,93,270/- Addition

THE ACIT, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI. M.A. MUHEYIDDIN, PARAVUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 386/COCH/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Dec 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Manjunatha G, Am

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri. C.B.M.Warrier, CA
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

additions towards opening cash balance, income from undisclosed sources and income from agriculture. Thereafter the A.O. initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271

THE ACIT, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI. M.A. MUHEYIDDIN, PARAVUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 384/COCH/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Dec 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Manjunatha G, Am

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri. C.B.M.Warrier, CA
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

additions towards opening cash balance, income from undisclosed sources and income from agriculture. Thereafter the A.O. initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271

DCIT, ERNAKULAM vs. M.A.MOHEYIDDIN, PARAVUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 385/COCH/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Dec 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Manjunatha G, Am

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri. C.B.M.Warrier, CA
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

additions towards opening cash balance, income from undisclosed sources and income from agriculture. Thereafter the A.O. initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271

THE ACIT, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI. M.A. MUHEYIDDIN, PARAVUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 383/COCH/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Dec 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Manjunatha G, Am

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri. C.B.M.Warrier, CA
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

additions towards opening cash balance, income from undisclosed sources and income from agriculture. Thereafter the A.O. initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271

THE ACIT, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI. M.A. MUHEYIDDIN, PARAVUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 382/COCH/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Dec 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Manjunatha G, Am

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri. C.B.M.Warrier, CA
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

additions towards opening cash balance, income from undisclosed sources and income from agriculture. Thereafter the A.O. initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271

THE ACIT, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI. M.A. MUHEYIDDIN, PARAVUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 381/COCH/2016[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Dec 2017AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Manjunatha G, Am

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri. C.B.M.Warrier, CA
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

additions towards opening cash balance, income from undisclosed sources and income from agriculture. Thereafter the A.O. initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271

THE ITO, KOLLAM vs. SRI.A.SHIHABUDEEN, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 566/COCH/2019[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Feb 2020AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Mrithunjaya Sharma, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri.S.Rajagopal, CA
Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

penalty was levied for concealment of income. I have carefully gone through the notice u/s 274 of the Act. For clarity we reproduce copy of one of the notices issued for assessment year 2000-2001, as under:- INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT Office of the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax Kollam Range, Kollam Notice u/s 274 read with section 271

THE ITO, KOLLAM vs. SRI.A.SHIHABUDEEN, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 568/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Feb 2020AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Mrithunjaya Sharma, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri.S.Rajagopal, CA
Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

penalty was levied for concealment of income. I have carefully gone through the notice u/s 274 of the Act. For clarity we reproduce copy of one of the notices issued for assessment year 2000-2001, as under:- INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT Office of the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax Kollam Range, Kollam Notice u/s 274 read with section 271

THE ITO, KOLLAM vs. SRI.A.SHIHABUDEEN, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 567/COCH/2019[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Feb 2020AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Mrithunjaya Sharma, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri.S.Rajagopal, CA
Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

penalty was levied for concealment of income. I have carefully gone through the notice u/s 274 of the Act. For clarity we reproduce copy of one of the notices issued for assessment year 2000-2001, as under:- INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT Office of the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax Kollam Range, Kollam Notice u/s 274 read with section 271

THE ITO, KOLLAM vs. SRI.A.SHIHABUDEEN, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 565/COCH/2019[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Feb 2020AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Mrithunjaya Sharma, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri.S.Rajagopal, CA
Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

penalty was levied for concealment of income. I have carefully gone through the notice u/s 274 of the Act. For clarity we reproduce copy of one of the notices issued for assessment year 2000-2001, as under:- INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT Office of the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax Kollam Range, Kollam Notice u/s 274 read with section 271

THE ITO, KOLLAM vs. SRI.A.SHIHABUDEEN, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 564/COCH/2019[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Feb 2020AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Mrithunjaya Sharma, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri.S.Rajagopal, CA
Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

penalty was levied for concealment of income. I have carefully gone through the notice u/s 274 of the Act. For clarity we reproduce copy of one of the notices issued for assessment year 2000-2001, as under:- INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT Office of the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax Kollam Range, Kollam Notice u/s 274 read with section 271