BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

77 results for “house property”+ Short Term Capital Gainsclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,676Delhi1,110Bangalore511Chennai365Jaipur357Ahmedabad335Kolkata266Hyderabad216Pune163Karnataka151Chandigarh119Indore118Cochin77Raipur76Surat68Visakhapatnam56Calcutta54Nagpur48Guwahati27Telangana25Rajkot25SC24Amritsar22Cuttack21Lucknow18Agra13Jodhpur9Kerala9Ranchi7Dehradun6Allahabad5Rajasthan4Patna4Jabalpur3Andhra Pradesh2Varanasi2Panaji1Gauhati1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Addition to Income53Section 143(3)37Section 153A32Section 13227Section 153C19Section 80G16Section 4015Section 143(2)14Capital Gains13

KUMAR MADHAVANPILLAI.S,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. ITO, WARD-1(4), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 461/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Oct 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Kumar Madhavanpillai S. Income Tax Officer -1(4) Chandra Press & Book Depot Aayakar Bhavan, Kowdiar P.O. Manjalikulam Road Thiruvananthapuram 695003 Vs. Thampanoor Thiruvananthapuram 695001 [Pan: Ajxps9299P] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Anil Krishnan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Girly Albert, Sr. D.R
Section 50Section 54

short-term capital gain arising from the sale of depreciable assets. 6 Kumar Madhavanpillai S. 16. The next controversy arises whether the investment made by the assessee in the new property is partly commercially in nature and partly residential in nature. In this regard, we note that assessee admittedly has been using the property for the residential purposes. Apart

Showing 1–20 of 77 · Page 1 of 4

Deduction11
Section 80G(5)10
Short Term Capital Gains9

THE ACIT, COCHIN vs. M/S.PVR TOURIST HOME, COCHIN

ITA 428/COCH/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Mar 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Soundararajan K., Jm Assessment Year: 2012-13 Acit, Circle-1, Non-Corporate .......... Appellant Iind Floor, C.R. Building, I.S. Press Road Ernakulam 682018 Vs. Pvr Tourist Home .......... Respondent Palarivattom, Kochi 682025 [Pan: Aadfp3442Q] Appellant By: Shri Suresh Sivanandan, Cit-Dr Respondent By: Shri Mohan Pulickal, Advocate Date Of Hearing: 10.03.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 21.03.2025

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Sivanandan, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Mohan Pulickal, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 45(4)Section 48Section 50Section 50(1)Section 50A

short term capital gain in respect of building by holding that the 4 PVT Tourist Home value of any block of asset is to be taken at the end of the previous year after taking into consideration the addition, if any, made in the block of assets during the year. 5. Being aggrieved by the decision

SMT.ANILAKUMARI G S,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 445/COCH/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Jun 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri.M.Ramesh Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR

term capital gains on the amount received as cost for the building. The assessee had constructed a house. The Corporation had allotted door number on 29.11.2004, the date which was treated as the date of completion of house property. Since the house property was sold within three years of construction, the property was treated as short

THE ACIT, TRICHUR vs. SRI.ARUN MAJEED, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 497/COCH/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Feb 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

shortly converting them into 4 plots and selling them individually constitute an adventure in nature of trade. In this I.T.A. Nos.494 - 497/Coch/2018 case on reference the HC had held that the intention of the assessee even when they purchased the land was to resell the same and not to make an investment. The Supreme Court upheld the decision

THE ACIT, TRICHUR vs. SRI.ARUN MAJEED, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 496/COCH/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Feb 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

shortly converting them into 4 plots and selling them individually constitute an adventure in nature of trade. In this I.T.A. Nos.494 - 497/Coch/2018 case on reference the HC had held that the intention of the assessee even when they purchased the land was to resell the same and not to make an investment. The Supreme Court upheld the decision

THE ACIT, TRICHUR vs. SRI.ARUN MAJEED, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 494/COCH/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Feb 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

shortly converting them into 4 plots and selling them individually constitute an adventure in nature of trade. In this I.T.A. Nos.494 - 497/Coch/2018 case on reference the HC had held that the intention of the assessee even when they purchased the land was to resell the same and not to make an investment. The Supreme Court upheld the decision

THE ACIT, TRICHUR vs. SRI.ARUN MAJEED, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 495/COCH/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Feb 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

shortly converting them into 4 plots and selling them individually constitute an adventure in nature of trade. In this I.T.A. Nos.494 - 497/Coch/2018 case on reference the HC had held that the intention of the assessee even when they purchased the land was to resell the same and not to make an investment. The Supreme Court upheld the decision

SRI.K.P. JOHNY,THRISSUR vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), THRISSUR

In the result, both the assessee’s and the Revenue’s appeals are partly allowed and partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 206/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Oct 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Dask.P. Johny Asst. Cit, Manappuram House Circle – 2(1) Hospital Road, Chalakkudy Aayakar Bhavan Vs. Thrissur 680307 Sakthan Thampuran Nagar [Pan:Acgpj4958G] Thrissur 680001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Asst. Cit, K.P. Johny Circle – 2(1) Manappuram House Aayakar Bhavan Hospital Road, Chalakkudy Vs. Sakthan Thampuran Nagar Thrissur 680307 Thrissur 680001 [Pan: Acgpj4958G] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri T.M. Sreedharan, Sr. Advocate (with Smt. Divya Ravindran, Adv. with him)For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 131(1)Section 133ASection 147Section 148(1)Section 69

House Aayakar Bhavan Hospital Road, Chalakkudy vs. Sakthan Thampuran Nagar Thrissur 680307 Thrissur 680001 [PAN: ACGPJ4958G] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri T.M. Sreedharan, Sr. Advocate (with Smt. Divya Ravindran, Adv. with him) Revenue by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 13.07.2023 Date of Pronouncement:09.10.2023 O R D E R Per Sanjay Arora, AM These are cross

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), THRISSUR vs. SRI.K.P. JOHNY, THRISSUR

In the result, both the assessee’s and the Revenue’s appeals are partly allowed and partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 254/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Oct 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Dask.P. Johny Asst. Cit, Manappuram House Circle – 2(1) Hospital Road, Chalakkudy Aayakar Bhavan Vs. Thrissur 680307 Sakthan Thampuran Nagar [Pan:Acgpj4958G] Thrissur 680001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Asst. Cit, K.P. Johny Circle – 2(1) Manappuram House Aayakar Bhavan Hospital Road, Chalakkudy Vs. Sakthan Thampuran Nagar Thrissur 680307 Thrissur 680001 [Pan: Acgpj4958G] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri T.M. Sreedharan, Sr. Advocate (with Smt. Divya Ravindran, Adv. with him)For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 131(1)Section 133ASection 147Section 148(1)Section 69

House Aayakar Bhavan Hospital Road, Chalakkudy vs. Sakthan Thampuran Nagar Thrissur 680307 Thrissur 680001 [PAN: ACGPJ4958G] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri T.M. Sreedharan, Sr. Advocate (with Smt. Divya Ravindran, Adv. with him) Revenue by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 13.07.2023 Date of Pronouncement:09.10.2023 O R D E R Per Sanjay Arora, AM These are cross

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 308/COCH/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

short, it was noticed that a separate account of the fund collected from students was maintained by the assessee and the co-trustees. According to the Assessing Officer, the claim of the assessee that it did not receive donations from students in his individual capacity was contrary to his own statements given consequent to the search. The other trustees, SmtGracyBabu

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 34/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

short, it was noticed that a separate account of the fund collected from students was maintained by the assessee and the co-trustees. According to the Assessing Officer, the claim of the assessee that it did not receive donations from students in his individual capacity was contrary to his own statements given consequent to the search. The other trustees, SmtGracyBabu

THE ACIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SMT.GRACY BABU, ADOOR P.O.

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 239/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

short, it was noticed that a separate account of the fund collected from students was maintained by the assessee and the co-trustees. According to the Assessing Officer, the claim of the assessee that it did not receive donations from students in his individual capacity was contrary to his own statements given consequent to the search. The other trustees, SmtGracyBabu

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 304/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

short, it was noticed that a separate account of the fund collected from students was maintained by the assessee and the co-trustees. According to the Assessing Officer, the claim of the assessee that it did not receive donations from students in his individual capacity was contrary to his own statements given consequent to the search. The other trustees, SmtGracyBabu

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 33/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

short, it was noticed that a separate account of the fund collected from students was maintained by the assessee and the co-trustees. According to the Assessing Officer, the claim of the assessee that it did not receive donations from students in his individual capacity was contrary to his own statements given consequent to the search. The other trustees, SmtGracyBabu

THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SRI.JOSE THOMAS, ADOOR

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 55/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

short, it was noticed that a separate account of the fund collected from students was maintained by the assessee and the co-trustees. According to the Assessing Officer, the claim of the assessee that it did not receive donations from students in his individual capacity was contrary to his own statements given consequent to the search. The other trustees, SmtGracyBabu

THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SMT.GRACY BABU, ADOOR P.O.

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 54/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

short, it was noticed that a separate account of the fund collected from students was maintained by the assessee and the co-trustees. According to the Assessing Officer, the claim of the assessee that it did not receive donations from students in his individual capacity was contrary to his own statements given consequent to the search. The other trustees, SmtGracyBabu

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 309/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

short, it was noticed that a separate account of the fund collected from students was maintained by the assessee and the co-trustees. According to the Assessing Officer, the claim of the assessee that it did not receive donations from students in his individual capacity was contrary to his own statements given consequent to the search. The other trustees, SmtGracyBabu

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 305/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

short, it was noticed that a separate account of the fund collected from students was maintained by the assessee and the co-trustees. According to the Assessing Officer, the claim of the assessee that it did not receive donations from students in his individual capacity was contrary to his own statements given consequent to the search. The other trustees, SmtGracyBabu

MRS.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 210/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

short, it was noticed that a separate account of the fund collected from students was maintained by the assessee and the co-trustees. According to the Assessing Officer, the claim of the assessee that it did not receive donations from students in his individual capacity was contrary to his own statements given consequent to the search. The other trustees, SmtGracyBabu

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 28/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

short, it was noticed that a separate account of the fund collected from students was maintained by the assessee and the co-trustees. According to the Assessing Officer, the claim of the assessee that it did not receive donations from students in his individual capacity was contrary to his own statements given consequent to the search. The other trustees, SmtGracyBabu