Search: house property

10 results for “house property”+ Section 69Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 115B16 Section 143(3)8 Section 69C8 Section 698 Section 2638 Section 688 Section 1477 Addition to Income6 House Property5 Section 69A

SRI.P.V.RAVINDRAN,KANNUR vs. THE ITO, KANNUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 302/COCH/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri T.M. Sreedharan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Shantam Bose, CIT DR

Section 115BSection 263Section 3(1)(b)Section 68

69C and 69D alone. Moreover, such income should be reflected in the return of income furnished u/s 139 or the income determined by the Assessing Officer should include any income referred to in the aforementioned Sections of the Act. In such an event, the calculation of income tax is specifically governed by the provisions of Sec.115BBE. It is submitted that

SRI.P.V.RAVINDRAN,KANNUR vs. THE ITO, KANNUR

SRI.P.V.RAVINDRAN,KANNUR vs. THE ITO, KANNUR

SHRI.P.V. RAVEENDRAN,KANNUR vs. THE ITO, KANNUR

SRI SRAVAN KUMAR NEELA,NALGONDA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, KOZHIKODE

SRI UMA MAHESHWARA RAO CHINNI,GUNTUR vs. ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

SHAHUL HAMEED,MANANTHAVADY vs. ITO, WARD-2, KALPETTA

BINDHU THOTTUNGAL GEORGE,THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), THRISSUR

BINDHU THOTTUNGAL GEORGE,THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), THRISSUR

BINDHU THOTTUNGAL GEORGE,THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD-1(1), THRISSUR

BINDHU THOTTUNGAL GEORGE,THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), THRISSUR

SHEEJAMOL SAINABABEEVI ALIYARUKUNJU,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3), TRIVANDRUM