BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Section 302clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka452Mumbai298Delhi159Jaipur88Chennai58Bangalore57Kolkata42Hyderabad41Ahmedabad33Telangana23Chandigarh18Rajkot13Nagpur13Indore11Pune10Surat8Lucknow6SC4Cochin3Raipur3Visakhapatnam2Calcutta2Patna2Cuttack2Amritsar1Andhra Pradesh1Varanasi1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 115B12Section 2638Section 688Section 271(1)(c)2Section 139(1)2Section 242Section 3(1)(b)2Unexplained Cash Credit2Unexplained Investment

SRI.P.V.RAVINDRAN,KANNUR vs. THE ITO, KANNUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 302/COCH/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri T.M. Sreedharan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Shantam Bose, CIT DR
Section 115BSection 263Section 3(1)(b)Section 68

302 & 303/Coch/2020 shortcomings in investments made in the earlier years and hence the income declared as a result of survey has to be taxed under section 115BBE r.w.s 69 of the act. Further after going through the facts of the case it is seen that the assessee has derived income from House Property

2
Survey u/s 133A2
Limitation/Time-bar2

SHRI.P.V. RAVEENDRAN,KANNUR vs. THE ITO, KANNUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 303/COCH/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri T.M. Sreedharan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Shantam Bose, CIT DR
Section 115BSection 263Section 3(1)(b)Section 68

302 & 303/Coch/2020 shortcomings in investments made in the earlier years and hence the income declared as a result of survey has to be taxed under section 115BBE r.w.s 69 of the act. Further after going through the facts of the case it is seen that the assessee has derived income from House Property

FRANCIS LISTON,ERNAKULAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NONCORPORATE WARD 2(1), KOCHI, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 673/COCH/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Nov 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Shri Francis ListonFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal. Snr DR
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 24Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

302 Eranakulam-682 018 PAN : AAUPL4921B APPLICANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Francis Liston Respondent by : Smt. Leena Lal. Snr DR Date of hearing : 29/10/2025 Date of pronouncement : 24/11/2025 O R D E R Per:Anikesh Banerjee (JM): The instant appeal of the assessee filed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter called ‘Ld.CIT(A)] passed