BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “house property”+ Section 273Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore44Mumbai21Karnataka21Ahmedabad16Jaipur12Hyderabad9Delhi9Chennai8Amritsar6Pune4Cuttack2Guwahati2Cochin2Kolkata2Surat2Rajkot1SC1Varanasi1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 269S4Section 271E3Section 269T3Section 271D2Penalty2

ASSANAR & SONS,KOTTAYAM vs. JTCIT, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 191/COCH/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Oct 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojariassessment Year: 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Thomas Cherian, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 131Section 269TSection 271E

properties among the parties and Shri Faizal Mohammed, the Manager of the firm being close to the family and having business relations happened to be the Mediator in the issues, for settlement of their family financial matters. The Ld. Counsel submitted that after the first round of negotiations, Shri Thomas arranged Rs.1,69,20,000/- from

S.V. PHARMACY AND NURSING HOME,ALUVA vs. THE JCIT, ALUVA RANGE, ALUVA, ALUVA

The appeal stands allowed

ITA 696/COCH/2022[2007-2008]Status: HeardITAT Cochin30 Nov 2022AY 2007-2008

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, J.M & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, A.M

For Appellant: Shri T.M. Sreedharan, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.J.M. Jamuna Devi (Addl.CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 269SSection 271D

House Property. Therefore, such receipts could neither be considered as deposit nor loan which call for imposition of penalty in terms of Sec.269SS. Further, the assessee was under bona fide belief that such receipts would not come within the purview of Sec.269SS. The case law of Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in CIT vs. Saini Medical Store