BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 801Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai242Delhi64Rajkot35Indore25Kolkata23Pune20Ahmedabad17Chennai15Bangalore13Hyderabad11Jaipur9Lucknow9Nagpur4Jodhpur3Guwahati3Surat3Cochin3Amritsar3Raipur2Ranchi2Dehradun2Jabalpur1Kerala1Karnataka1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 80I9Section 801B(10)3Deduction3

ACIT, KOCHI vs. M/S SKYLINE BUILDERS, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 942/COCH/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 May 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

For Appellant: Sri.Sundarasan S, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Sri.P.M.Veeramani, CA
Section 801B(10)Section 80I

section also does not specify the size or the number of projects that are required to be undertaken on a plot having a minimum area of one acre. Moreover, the finding given by the AO at para 11 of the assessment order that "it is giving impressions that Aster project, shown as Block A in the approved plan, is having

ACIT, ERNAKULAM vs. M/S SKYLINE BUILDERS, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 928/COCH/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 May 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

For Appellant: Sri.Sundarasan S, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Sri.P.M.Veeramani, CA
Section 801B(10)Section 80I

section also does not specify the size or the number of projects that are required to be undertaken on a plot having a minimum area of one acre. Moreover, the finding given by the AO at para 11 of the assessment order that "it is giving impressions that Aster project, shown as Block A in the approved plan, is having

ACIT, ERNAKULAM vs. M/S SKYLINE BUILDERS, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 927/COCH/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 May 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

For Appellant: Sri.Sundarasan S, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Sri.P.M.Veeramani, CA
Section 801B(10)Section 80I

section also does not specify the size or the number of projects that are required to be undertaken on a plot having a minimum area of one acre. Moreover, the finding given by the AO at para 11 of the assessment order that "it is giving impressions that Aster project, shown as Block A in the approved plan, is having