BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15 results for “disallowance”+ Section 690clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai505Delhi419Chennai201Kolkata124Bangalore108Ahmedabad89Hyderabad70Jaipur46Surat43Pune37Lucknow28Indore24Chandigarh20Rajkot15Cochin15Guwahati9Karnataka8Cuttack7Raipur6Ranchi6Agra5Visakhapatnam5Jodhpur4Amritsar4Varanasi3SC3Uttarakhand1Patna1Nagpur1Jabalpur1Himachal Pradesh1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 153A14Section 80P14Disallowance10Section 143(3)9Section 143(1)(a)9Addition to Income9Section 358Section 1327Depreciation7Deduction

MAVELIKARA AIDED SCHOOL EMPLOYEES CO-OP SOCIETY LTD,MAVELIKARA vs. ITO WARD 1, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 974/COCH/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Oct 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am &Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Rajukutty Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamuna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 142Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 80Section 80ASection 80P

690 101. [PAN: AACAM9759K] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Sri.Rajukutty Joseph, CA Respondent by: Smt.J.M.Jamuna Devi, Sr.DR Date of Date of Hearing : 11.09.2023 Pronouncement: 09.10.2023 O R D E R Per Sanjay Arora, AM: This is an appeal by the Assessee directed against the Order dated 28.09.2022 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Income Tax Department (NFAC, Delhi), dismissing

6
Section 1444
Section 142(1)4

M/S.THOMSON INDUTRIES,THRISSUR vs. THE ACIT,CEN-CIRCLE-2 ,ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 195/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Jan 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm Ita Nos. 195 & 196/Coch/2019 Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13 M/S. Thomson Industries, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Thazhekkad, Income-Tax, Central Circle-2, Thrissur. Kochi. [Pan:Aafft 8235M]

Section 40

disallowed. In our opinion, on merits, the assessee has no case. Moreover, this issue was considered by the Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Prudential Logistics and Transports vs. ITO 364 ITR 690 wherein it was held as under: “5. Reading of section

M/S.THOMSON INDUTRIES,THRISSUR vs. THE ACIT,CEN-CIRCLE-2 ,ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 196/COCH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Jan 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm Ita Nos. 195 & 196/Coch/2019 Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13 M/S. Thomson Industries, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Thazhekkad, Income-Tax, Central Circle-2, Thrissur. Kochi. [Pan:Aafft 8235M]

Section 40

disallowed. In our opinion, on merits, the assessee has no case. Moreover, this issue was considered by the Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Prudential Logistics and Transports vs. ITO 364 ITR 690 wherein it was held as under: “5. Reading of section

THE MAHADEVIKAD SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ITO WARD 5 , ALAPPUZHA

ITA 289/COCH/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 139Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 80A(5)Section 80P

690 516. Kerala. PAN: AAEAT 9378F APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Shri Rajakannan, Advocate Respondent by : Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. DR Date of hearing : 05.12.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 03.01.2025 O R D E R Per Prashant Maharishi, Vice President 1. ITA Number 289/Coch/2023 is filed by the Mahadevikad Service Cooperative bank Limited for assessment year 2017-18 against appellate order passed

CLAPPANA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK ALTD.,KARUNAGAPPALLY vs. ITO, WARD 1&TPS, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

ITA 777/COCH/2023[ AY 2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2024

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhassessment Year: 2017-2018 M/S. Clappana Service Co-Operative The Income Tax Officer Bank Limited No.867 V. Ward 1, Alappuzha. Cp/Viii/410 & 411, Clappana Po Karunagappally, Kollam – 690 525 Pan : Aabac2747A. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Rajakannan, Advocate Respondent By : Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R. Date Of Pronouncement : 25.09.2024 Date Of Hearing : 12.08.2024 O R D E R Per Bench : This Assessee’S Appeal For A.Y. 2017-18 Arises Against The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Cit(A)]’S Din & Order No. Itba/ Nfac/S/250/2023-24/1055921666(1) Dated 11.09.2023, Passed U/S. 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act).

For Appellant: Shri Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 2Section 22Section 250Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)

690 525 PAN : AABAC2747A. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Rajakannan, Advocate Respondent by : Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R. Date of Pronouncement : 25.09.2024 Date of Hearing : 12.08.2024 O R D E R Per Bench : This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2017-18 arises against the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)]’s DIN & Order No. ITBA/ NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1055921666(1) dated

KUTHANUR SERVICE CO_OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,KUTHANUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, PALAKKAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1128/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am Assessment Year: 2017-18 Kuthanur Service Co-Op. Bank Ltd. .......... Appellant Kuthanur, Palakkad 678621 [Pan: Aaaaik151G] Vs. The Income Tax Officer .......... Respondent Ward - 1, Palakkad

For Appellant: Ms. Dhanya G., CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

690/-. While doing so, the AO disallowed deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) in respect of interest income received from co-operative banks. 3. Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), who vide the impugned order confirmed the action of the AO. 4. Being aggrieved, the appellant is in appeal before us in the present appeal

M/S.ST.GEORGE MOTORS,KOTTAYAM vs. THE ITO, WD-4, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 264/COCH/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Feb 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. M.S.Venkitachalam, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 40Section 40A(3)

690. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) of the I.T.Act vide order dated 22.01.2014 making total addition of ITA No.264/Coch/2018. 2 St.George Motors. Rs.11,21,261. The details of the additions made by the Assessing Officer read as follows:- Sr. Item Amount (Rs.) Reason No. 1. Commission received 140810 Difference with 26AS 2. Disallowance u/s 40A(3) 92760 Cash

NITTA GELATIN INDIA LIMITED,KOCHI vs. CORPORATE CIRCLE 2(1), KOCHI, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 804/COCH/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm Assessment Year: 2012-13 Nitta Gelatin India Ltd. .......... Appellant 50/1002, Sbt Avenue, Panampilly Nagar Kochi 682036 [Pan: Aabck1582H] Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 2(1), Kochi ......... Respondent Assessee By: Shri K. Gopi, Ca Revenue By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 07.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 19.11.2025

For Appellant: Shri K. Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 35Section 35(1)(i)

690/-. Subsequently, AO formed an opinion that income escaped assessment to tax. Accordingly, issued notice u/s. 148 of the Act on 25.03.2017. In response to the notice u/s. 148, the appellant filed return of income on 24.04.2017. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the AO after making disallowance

SREEKUMARI AMMA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 604/COCH/2022[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

690 4. There was a search u/s. 132 of the IT Act (“the Act”) was carried out in the case of Shri Vinodkumar Kuttappan group on 05.05.2016 and the assessee is wife of Shri Vinod Kumar Kuttappan. The assessee is the Managing Director of Keranadu Printing and Publishing (P) Ltd. and Nightingale College of Nursing, Trivandrum. Warrant of authorisation

SREEKUMARI AMMA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 603/COCH/2022[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

690 4. There was a search u/s. 132 of the IT Act (“the Act”) was carried out in the case of Shri Vinodkumar Kuttappan group on 05.05.2016 and the assessee is wife of Shri Vinod Kumar Kuttappan. The assessee is the Managing Director of Keranadu Printing and Publishing (P) Ltd. and Nightingale College of Nursing, Trivandrum. Warrant of authorisation

SREEKUMARI AMMA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 605/COCH/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2015-2016

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

690 4. There was a search u/s. 132 of the IT Act (“the Act”) was carried out in the case of Shri Vinodkumar Kuttappan group on 05.05.2016 and the assessee is wife of Shri Vinod Kumar Kuttappan. The assessee is the Managing Director of Keranadu Printing and Publishing (P) Ltd. and Nightingale College of Nursing, Trivandrum. Warrant of authorisation

SREEKUMARI AMMA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 602/COCH/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

690 4. There was a search u/s. 132 of the IT Act (“the Act”) was carried out in the case of Shri Vinodkumar Kuttappan group on 05.05.2016 and the assessee is wife of Shri Vinod Kumar Kuttappan. The assessee is the Managing Director of Keranadu Printing and Publishing (P) Ltd. and Nightingale College of Nursing, Trivandrum. Warrant of authorisation

SREEKUMARI AMMA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 606/COCH/2022[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2016-2017

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

690 4. There was a search u/s. 132 of the IT Act (“the Act”) was carried out in the case of Shri Vinodkumar Kuttappan group on 05.05.2016 and the assessee is wife of Shri Vinod Kumar Kuttappan. The assessee is the Managing Director of Keranadu Printing and Publishing (P) Ltd. and Nightingale College of Nursing, Trivandrum. Warrant of authorisation

SREEKUMARI AMMA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 607/COCH/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

690 4. There was a search u/s. 132 of the IT Act (“the Act”) was carried out in the case of Shri Vinodkumar Kuttappan group on 05.05.2016 and the assessee is wife of Shri Vinod Kumar Kuttappan. The assessee is the Managing Director of Keranadu Printing and Publishing (P) Ltd. and Nightingale College of Nursing, Trivandrum. Warrant of authorisation

SREEKUMARI AMMA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 601/COCH/2022[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

690 4. There was a search u/s. 132 of the IT Act (“the Act”) was carried out in the case of Shri Vinodkumar Kuttappan group on 05.05.2016 and the assessee is wife of Shri Vinod Kumar Kuttappan. The assessee is the Managing Director of Keranadu Printing and Publishing (P) Ltd. and Nightingale College of Nursing, Trivandrum. Warrant of authorisation