BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “disallowance”+ Section 5Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune358Mumbai177Delhi98Bangalore60Kolkata59Chennai58Jaipur38Hyderabad36Surat31Ahmedabad25Indore20Raipur17Ranchi16Cochin12Panaji12Chandigarh8Karnataka5SC4Jodhpur2Lucknow2Cuttack2Rajkot2ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1Calcutta1Visakhapatnam1Amritsar1Allahabad1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)30Section 37(1)26Section 26315Disallowance9Section 358Section 457Section 577Section 271(1)(c)5Deduction5Section 148

THE ACIT, THIRUVALLA vs. M/S.MUTHOOT PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 75/COCH/2018[2005-06]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

Section 58B(5A) of the RBI Act, introduced by the Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 1983. RBI issued directions under Chapter III-B of RBI Act prohibiting among others, non-banking financial companies from holding deposits over 25 per cent of its paid-up capital and the reserves. The Supreme Court has acknowledged that the impugned legislation placed restrictions

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1, THIRUVALLA, THIRUVALLA vs. MAR GREGORIOUS MEMORIAL MUTHOOT MEDICAL CENTRE, PATHANAMTHITTA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

4
Reassessment4
ITA 69/COCH/2018[2002-03]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

Section 58B(5A) of the RBI Act, introduced by the Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 1983. RBI issued directions under Chapter III-B of RBI Act prohibiting among others, non-banking financial companies from holding deposits over 25 per cent of its paid-up capital and the reserves. The Supreme Court has acknowledged that the impugned legislation placed restrictions

DCIT, THIRUVALLA vs. MAR GREGORIOUS MEMORIAL MUTHOOT MEDICAL CENTRE, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 72/COCH/2018[2007-08]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

Section 58B(5A) of the RBI Act, introduced by the Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 1983. RBI issued directions under Chapter III-B of RBI Act prohibiting among others, non-banking financial companies from holding deposits over 25 per cent of its paid-up capital and the reserves. The Supreme Court has acknowledged that the impugned legislation placed restrictions

DCIT, THIRUVALLA vs. MAR GREGORIOUS MEMORIAL MUTHOOT MEDICAL CENTRE, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 70/COCH/2018[2003-04]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

Section 58B(5A) of the RBI Act, introduced by the Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 1983. RBI issued directions under Chapter III-B of RBI Act prohibiting among others, non-banking financial companies from holding deposits over 25 per cent of its paid-up capital and the reserves. The Supreme Court has acknowledged that the impugned legislation placed restrictions

DCIT, THIRUVALLA vs. MAR GREGORIOUS MEMORIAL MUTHOOT MEDICAL CENTRE, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 71/COCH/2018[2004-05]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

Section 58B(5A) of the RBI Act, introduced by the Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 1983. RBI issued directions under Chapter III-B of RBI Act prohibiting among others, non-banking financial companies from holding deposits over 25 per cent of its paid-up capital and the reserves. The Supreme Court has acknowledged that the impugned legislation placed restrictions

THE ACIT, THIRUVALLA vs. M/S.MUTHOOT PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 73/COCH/2018[2002-03]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

Section 58B(5A) of the RBI Act, introduced by the Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 1983. RBI issued directions under Chapter III-B of RBI Act prohibiting among others, non-banking financial companies from holding deposits over 25 per cent of its paid-up capital and the reserves. The Supreme Court has acknowledged that the impugned legislation placed restrictions

DCIT, THIRUVALLA vs. MUTHOOT PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS,, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 74/COCH/2018[2003-04]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

Section 58B(5A) of the RBI Act, introduced by the Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 1983. RBI issued directions under Chapter III-B of RBI Act prohibiting among others, non-banking financial companies from holding deposits over 25 per cent of its paid-up capital and the reserves. The Supreme Court has acknowledged that the impugned legislation placed restrictions

M/S.POPULAR FINANCE,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 203/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)

Section 58B(5A) of the RBI Act, introduced by the Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 1983. RBI issued directions under Chapter III-B of RBI Act prohibiting among others, non- banking financial companies from holding deposits over 25 per cent of its paid- up capital and the reserves. The Supreme Court has acknowledged that the impugned legislation placed restrictions

M/S POPULAR FINANCE COMPANY,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT,CIR-1,, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 202/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)

Section 58B(5A) of the RBI Act, introduced by the Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 1983. RBI issued directions under Chapter III-B of RBI Act prohibiting among others, non- banking financial companies from holding deposits over 25 per cent of its paid- up capital and the reserves. The Supreme Court has acknowledged that the impugned legislation placed restrictions

M/S POPULAR FINANCE COMPANY,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT,CIR-1,, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 204/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)

Section 58B(5A) of the RBI Act, introduced by the Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 1983. RBI issued directions under Chapter III-B of RBI Act prohibiting among others, non- banking financial companies from holding deposits over 25 per cent of its paid- up capital and the reserves. The Supreme Court has acknowledged that the impugned legislation placed restrictions

HERCULES AUTOMOBILES INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. AO TYPE-W, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, ALLEPPEY

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 776/COCH/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm Assessment Year: 2012-13 Hercules Automobiles International P. Ltd. .......... Appellant Tc No.16/1860, Dpi Road, Thycaud S.O. Chempakassery, Thiruvananthapuram 695014 [Pan: Aabcn2898M] Vs. Dcit, Circle - 1, Alappuzha ......... Respondent Assessee By: Shri Jose Zachariah, Ca Revenue By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 06.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 20.11.2025

For Appellant: Shri Jose Zachariah, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 14ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

5a) to section 271(1)(c) of the Act. 7. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material available on record. The issue that arises in the present appeal is whether the order imposing penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) is justified or not. Penalty proceedings were initiated on account of disallowance

NITTA GELATIN INDIA LIMITED,KOCHI vs. CORPORATE CIRCLE 2(1), KOCHI, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 804/COCH/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm Assessment Year: 2012-13 Nitta Gelatin India Ltd. .......... Appellant 50/1002, Sbt Avenue, Panampilly Nagar Kochi 682036 [Pan: Aabck1582H] Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 2(1), Kochi ......... Respondent Assessee By: Shri K. Gopi, Ca Revenue By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 07.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 19.11.2025

For Appellant: Shri K. Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 35Section 35(1)(i)

disallowance u/s. 35(2AB) of Rs. 1,00,80,910/- on the ground that the expenditure relating to research and development was not certified by DSIR in Form 3CL. 3. Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), who vide the impugned order partly allowed the appeal of the assessee. 4. Being aggrieved, the appellant is in appeal