BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “disallowance”+ Section 43Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai123Chennai66Delhi63Hyderabad38Pune34Ahmedabad29Bangalore28Kolkata24Cochin11Surat11Visakhapatnam10Chandigarh8Amritsar7Rajkot6SC6Jaipur5Telangana4Karnataka4Jabalpur3Cuttack3Patna2Nagpur2Allahabad2Himachal Pradesh2Dehradun2Calcutta1Guwahati1Punjab & Haryana1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 4020Section 80P14Deduction8Section 1547Section 80P(4)6Disallowance6Section 143(3)5Section 40A(3)5Section 80P(2)(a)4Section 80P(2)4Limitation/Time-bar3Condonation of Delay3

THE KOTTAYAM DIST. CO-OP BANK LTD,KOTTAYAM vs. ACIT, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 218/COCH/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Nov 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 41(4)Section 43D

disallowed. It was submitted that as per the usual practice prescribed by the Co-operative department, the bank must take the interest on bad and doubtful debts also as income and added with other interest and the gross interest is to be shown as income and then they will direct a provision to the extent of that interest and charge

JULIUS RUBEN,KOCHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 219/COCH/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George George K, Vice- & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Sri.A.Gopalakrishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR
Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 40A(3)

disallowance of such expenditure which is otherwise allowable as deduction in the computation of profits and gains from business or profession computed in accordance with the provisions of sections 28 to 43D

M/S. K.K ABRAHAM AND COMPANY,KOCHI vs. THE ITO, NON CORPORATE WARD 1(3), KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 854/COCH/2022[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Mar 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Shri Narayanan P. Potty, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 29Section 30Section 40Section 5

43D. By virtue of Section 5 of the Act, that total income of any previous years includes all income from whatever source derived. For the purpose of Section 40(b) read with Explanation, there cannot be separate method of accounting for ascertaining the net profit and/or book profit. The said section nowhere provides that the net profit as shown

M/S. K.K ABRAHAM AND COMPANY,KOCHI vs. THE ITO, NON CORPORATE WARD 1(3), KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 853/COCH/2022[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Mar 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Shri Narayanan P. Potty, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 29Section 30Section 40Section 5

43D. By virtue of Section 5 of the Act, that total income of any previous years includes all income from whatever source derived. For the purpose of Section 40(b) read with Explanation, there cannot be separate method of accounting for ascertaining the net profit and/or book profit. The said section nowhere provides that the net profit as shown

M/S.KERALA MEDICAL SERVICES CORPN LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-1(4), TRIVANDRUM

The appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 108/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 May 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 249(3)

disallowance of VAT by invoking section 43B is also illegal. 3. It is submitted that the appellant has not engaged in any trading activity nor running any business or earning income therefrom. 4. The appellant also has no income to be computed in accordance with section 29 of the Act. There is no computation of profits and gains of business

M/S.KERALA MEDICAL SERVICES CORPN LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-1(4), TRIVANDRUM

The appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 107/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 May 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 249(3)

disallowance of VAT by invoking section 43B is also illegal. 3. It is submitted that the appellant has not engaged in any trading activity nor running any business or earning income therefrom. 4. The appellant also has no income to be computed in accordance with section 29 of the Act. There is no computation of profits and gains of business

M/S.KERALA MEDICAL SERVICES CORPN LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-1(4), TRIVANDRUM

The appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 109/COCH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 May 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 249(3)

disallowance of VAT by invoking section 43B is also illegal. 3. It is submitted that the appellant has not engaged in any trading activity nor running any business or earning income therefrom. 4. The appellant also has no income to be computed in accordance with section 29 of the Act. There is no computation of profits and gains of business

M/S.CHEVAYUR SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,CALICUT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(1), KOZHIKKODE, KOZHIKKODE

ITA 152/COCH/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Jun 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Arjun NedungadiFor Respondent: Sri.Mritunjaya Sharma, Sr.DR
Section 4Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

disallowance of claim of deduction u/s 80P of the I.T.Act made by the Assessing Officer was upheld by the CIT(A). In the result the appeals filed by the assessee ITA Nos.152-153/Coch/2020 3 M/s.Chevayur SCB Ltd. were rejected by the CIT(A) for assessment years 2009-2010 and 2014-2015. 6. Aggrieved by the orders passed

M/S.CHEVAYUR SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,CALICUT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(1), KOZHIKKODE, KOZHIKKODE

ITA 153/COCH/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Jun 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Arjun NedungadiFor Respondent: Sri.Mritunjaya Sharma, Sr.DR
Section 4Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

disallowance of claim of deduction u/s 80P of the I.T.Act made by the Assessing Officer was upheld by the CIT(A). In the result the appeals filed by the assessee ITA Nos.152-153/Coch/2020 3 M/s.Chevayur SCB Ltd. were rejected by the CIT(A) for assessment years 2009-2010 and 2014-2015. 6. Aggrieved by the orders passed

TIME ADS & PUBLICITY,KOCHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(2), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes, and the assessee’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 27/COCH/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Aug 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sajit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 40

section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) dated 23.12.2010 for assessment year (AY) 2008-2009; the first appellate authority, being the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2, Kochi [`CIT(A)’ for short], having allowed part relief to the assessee vide his order dated 14.5.2012. ITA Nos.226/C/2012 & 27/C/2023 (AY 2008-2009) Time Ads & Publicity v. Asst

ACIT, ERNAKULAM vs. M/S.TIME ADS & PUBLICITY, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes, and the assessee’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 226/COCH/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Aug 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sajit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 40

section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) dated 23.12.2010 for assessment year (AY) 2008-2009; the first appellate authority, being the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2, Kochi [`CIT(A)’ for short], having allowed part relief to the assessee vide his order dated 14.5.2012. ITA Nos.226/C/2012 & 27/C/2023 (AY 2008-2009) Time Ads & Publicity v. Asst