BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 43Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai133Chennai74Delhi63Bangalore43Hyderabad38Kolkata24Pune22Ahmedabad14Chandigarh6SC6Cochin5Rajkot5Karnataka4Telangana4Surat3Jabalpur3Himachal Pradesh2Jaipur2Dehradun2Patna2Nagpur2Punjab & Haryana1Kerala1Calcutta1Amritsar1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 4020Section 1547Section 40A(3)5Deduction5Section 143(3)4Disallowance3Section 292Section 302Section 52

JULIUS RUBEN,KOCHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 219/COCH/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George George K, Vice- & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Sri.A.Gopalakrishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR
Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 40A(3)

disallowance of such expenditure which is otherwise allowable as deduction in the computation of profits and gains from business or profession computed in accordance with the provisions of sections 28 to 43D

M/S. K.K ABRAHAM AND COMPANY,KOCHI vs. THE ITO, NON CORPORATE WARD 1(3), KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 853/COCH/2022[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Mar 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Shri Narayanan P. Potty, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 29Section 30Section 40Section 5

43D. By virtue of Section 5 of the Act, that total income of any previous years includes all income from whatever source derived. For the purpose of Section 40(b) read with Explanation, there cannot be separate method of accounting for ascertaining the net profit and/or book profit. The said section nowhere provides that the net profit as shown

M/S. K.K ABRAHAM AND COMPANY,KOCHI vs. THE ITO, NON CORPORATE WARD 1(3), KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 854/COCH/2022[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Mar 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Shri Narayanan P. Potty, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 29Section 30Section 40Section 5

43D. By virtue of Section 5 of the Act, that total income of any previous years includes all income from whatever source derived. For the purpose of Section 40(b) read with Explanation, there cannot be separate method of accounting for ascertaining the net profit and/or book profit. The said section nowhere provides that the net profit as shown

ACIT, ERNAKULAM vs. M/S.TIME ADS & PUBLICITY, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes, and the assessee’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 226/COCH/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Aug 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sajit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 40

section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) dated 23.12.2010 for assessment year (AY) 2008-2009; the first appellate authority, being the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2, Kochi [`CIT(A)’ for short], having allowed part relief to the assessee vide his order dated 14.5.2012. ITA Nos.226/C/2012 & 27/C/2023 (AY 2008-2009) Time Ads & Publicity v. Asst

TIME ADS & PUBLICITY,KOCHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(2), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes, and the assessee’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 27/COCH/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Aug 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sajit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 40

section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) dated 23.12.2010 for assessment year (AY) 2008-2009; the first appellate authority, being the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2, Kochi [`CIT(A)’ for short], having allowed part relief to the assessee vide his order dated 14.5.2012. ITA Nos.226/C/2012 & 27/C/2023 (AY 2008-2009) Time Ads & Publicity v. Asst