BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

53 results for “disallowance”+ Section 40A(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,210Delhi1,160Bangalore450Kolkata442Chennai440Pune437Ahmedabad349Hyderabad217Jaipur205Raipur137Chandigarh109Surat99Indore96Amritsar86Visakhapatnam84Cuttack55Cochin53Nagpur41Rajkot39Lucknow37Allahabad26Jodhpur25Agra25Karnataka20Guwahati13SC10Patna9Varanasi7Ranchi7Dehradun6Calcutta5Telangana3Jabalpur2Punjab & Haryana2Panaji2Kerala2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 4039Addition to Income32Section 26330Disallowance30Section 143(3)23Deduction23Section 40A(3)22Section 19520Exemption14Section 80P

KKR AGRO MILLS P. LTD,ERNAKULAM vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee

ITA 328/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Dec 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy Sassessment Year : 2010-11 Kkr Agro Mills Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit, Iii/678, Kkr Building, Okkal Kalady, Circle – 1(2), Ernakulam – 683 550. Kochi. Pan : Aabck 6542 K Assessee Respondent

For Appellant: Smt. Parvathy Ammal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr. AR
Section 40A(2)Section 40A(2)(a)

section 40A(2) 4. Addition for under reporting of production on account of Mismatch between electricity consumption & Rice Production (Production and unaccounted sales Estimated) a) The Assessing Officer as well as the CIT (Appeals) was not justified in rejecting the book results only on the ground of irregular pattern of consumption of electricity. b) It is submitted that there

M/S SULAIKHA CLAY MINES,TRIVANDRUM vs. DCIT ,CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

Showing 1–20 of 53 · Page 1 of 3

12
Section 201(1)10
Section 9(1)(vii)10

In the result, the appeals for all the years are partly allowed and partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 937/COCH/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Aug 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: Shri Muhammad Shafeeq A., CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)

b) Sales - 46.00 - - - - 5.3 We are appalled at the manner in which the AO has gone about making the disallowance, i.e., in complete disregard of the mandate of law and the established principles of adjudication. To begin with, the very fact of invocation of section 40A(2

SULAIKHA CLAY MINES,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 1(2), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeals for all the years are partly allowed and partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 627/COCH/2022[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Aug 2023AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: Shri Muhammad Shafeeq A., CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)

b) Sales - 46.00 - - - - 5.3 We are appalled at the manner in which the AO has gone about making the disallowance, i.e., in complete disregard of the mandate of law and the established principles of adjudication. To begin with, the very fact of invocation of section 40A(2

SULAIKHA CLAY MINES,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 1(2), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeals for all the years are partly allowed and partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 623/COCH/2022[2004-2005]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Aug 2023AY 2004-2005

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: Shri Muhammad Shafeeq A., CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)

b) Sales - 46.00 - - - - 5.3 We are appalled at the manner in which the AO has gone about making the disallowance, i.e., in complete disregard of the mandate of law and the established principles of adjudication. To begin with, the very fact of invocation of section 40A(2

SULAIKHA CLAY MINES,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 1(2), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeals for all the years are partly allowed and partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 626/COCH/2022[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Aug 2023AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: Shri Muhammad Shafeeq A., CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)

b) Sales - 46.00 - - - - 5.3 We are appalled at the manner in which the AO has gone about making the disallowance, i.e., in complete disregard of the mandate of law and the established principles of adjudication. To begin with, the very fact of invocation of section 40A(2

SULAIKHA CLAY MINES,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 1(2), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeals for all the years are partly allowed and partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 624/COCH/2022[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Aug 2023AY 2005-2006

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: Shri Muhammad Shafeeq A., CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)

b) Sales - 46.00 - - - - 5.3 We are appalled at the manner in which the AO has gone about making the disallowance, i.e., in complete disregard of the mandate of law and the established principles of adjudication. To begin with, the very fact of invocation of section 40A(2

SULAIKHA CLAY MINES,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 1(2), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeals for all the years are partly allowed and partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 625/COCH/2022[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Aug 2023AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: Shri Muhammad Shafeeq A., CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)

b) Sales - 46.00 - - - - 5.3 We are appalled at the manner in which the AO has gone about making the disallowance, i.e., in complete disregard of the mandate of law and the established principles of adjudication. To begin with, the very fact of invocation of section 40A(2

MINA WOOD INDUSTRIES,MATTANNUR vs. ITO, W-3, KANNUR

The appeals are allowed

ITA 168/COCH/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Sept 2024AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhmina Wood Industries The Income Tax Officer Iii/656 B, Kallur Ward - 3, Kannur Mattannur Vs. Kannur 670702 [Pan: Aagfm2716D] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Aruj Raj S., AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 250Section 40A(3)

2 The Appellant humbly submits that the payments under reference, are made to Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) in cash in excess of Rs. 10000 could not be treated as in violation of Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, as the KSEB is a Government Department under Kerala Government headed by a Minister. The appellant humbly submit that

MR.THOMAS DANIEL,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ITO, WARD-4, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 68/COCH/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Nov 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. No.68/Coch/2018 Assessment Year : 2014-15

Section 194ASection 40Section 44A

B on any such sum but is not deemed to be an assessee in default under the first proviso to sub-section(1) of section 201, then, for the purpose of this sub-clause, it shall be deemed that the assessee has deducted and paid the tax on such sum on the date of furnishing of return of income

ASIANET SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 474/COCH/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Soundararajan K, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Raghunathan S, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. DR
Section 40A(7)

2. Since identical facts and issues involve in these appeals, these appeals heard together and disposed of vide this common order. Asianet Satellite Communications Ltd.. 3. For the sake of convenience and clarity, facts relevant to the A.Y. 2017-18 in ITA No. 474/Coch/2025 are stated herein. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant

ASIANET SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 475/COCH/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Soundararajan K, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Raghunathan S, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. DR
Section 40A(7)

2. Since identical facts and issues involve in these appeals, these appeals heard together and disposed of vide this common order. Asianet Satellite Communications Ltd.. 3. For the sake of convenience and clarity, facts relevant to the A.Y. 2017-18 in ITA No. 474/Coch/2025 are stated herein. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant

M/S.EMPEE CREDIT CORPORATION,CALICUT vs. THE ACIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 13/COCH/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Apr 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri George George K.

Section 143(3)Section 40ASection 40A(2)Section 40A(2)(b)

disallowed a sum of Rs.8,67,767/- being excessive interest paid to related party’s concerns. The relevant finding of the Assessing Officer reads as follows: “During the year, the assessee incurred an expenditure of Rs.44,27,661/- towards finance costs. A perusal of this account reveals that out of the total finance costs, an amount of Rs.22

M/S.ST.GEORGE MOTORS,KOTTAYAM vs. THE ITO, WD-4, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 264/COCH/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Feb 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. M.S.Venkitachalam, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 40Section 40A(3)

2. Disallowance u/s 40A(3) 92760 Cash payment 3. Audit fee 45000 TDS not deducted 4. Remuneration paid to 136937 Not working Mrs.Neethu partner 5. Remuneration paid to working 705754 40(b)(ii) & partner 40(b)(v) 4. Aggrieved by the assessment completed, the assessee preferred an appeal to the first appellate authority. The CIT(A) confirmed the addition totaling

M/S.PERRORKADA SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in I

ITA 563/COCH/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 195Section 263Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 80P

40A(3), including interest, rent, salary and other business expense where payment in cash exceeding Rs.20,000 and not covered by Rule 6DD. iv. disallowance of interest and other sums under section 40(a)(i), if any, if section 195 is violated. v. disallowance under section 40(a)(ia), after due examination (due care is to be taken

M/S.PERRORKADA SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in I

ITA 141/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 195Section 263Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 80P

40A(3), including interest, rent, salary and other business expense where payment in cash exceeding Rs.20,000 and not covered by Rule 6DD. iv. disallowance of interest and other sums under section 40(a)(i), if any, if section 195 is violated. v. disallowance under section 40(a)(ia), after due examination (due care is to be taken

M/S.PEROORKADA SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in I

ITA 400/COCH/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 195Section 263Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 80P

40A(3), including interest, rent, salary and other business expense where payment in cash exceeding Rs.20,000 and not covered by Rule 6DD. iv. disallowance of interest and other sums under section 40(a)(i), if any, if section 195 is violated. v. disallowance under section 40(a)(ia), after due examination (due care is to be taken

THE ITO, TRIVANDRUM vs. M/S.PERRORKADA SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in I

ITA 47/COCH/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 195Section 263Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 80P

40A(3), including interest, rent, salary and other business expense where payment in cash exceeding Rs.20,000 and not covered by Rule 6DD. iv. disallowance of interest and other sums under section 40(a)(i), if any, if section 195 is violated. v. disallowance under section 40(a)(ia), after due examination (due care is to be taken

M/S.PEROORKADA SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in I

ITA 93/COCH/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 195Section 263Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 80P

40A(3), including interest, rent, salary and other business expense where payment in cash exceeding Rs.20,000 and not covered by Rule 6DD. iv. disallowance of interest and other sums under section 40(a)(i), if any, if section 195 is violated. v. disallowance under section 40(a)(ia), after due examination (due care is to be taken

M/S.ALLIANZ CORNHILL INFORMATION SERVICES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE DCIT, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, ground Nos

ITA 489/COCH/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 May 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Raghunathan S, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri. Santhom Bose, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(2)(b)Section 156Section 2Section 36(1)(va)Section 40

b) of the I.T.Act before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP). The DRP vide its order dated ITA No.489/Coch/2016 & SA 60/Coch/2017. 3 M/s.Allianz Cornhill International Services Pvt.Ltd. 12.08.2016, disposed off the objections of the assessee. The direction of the DRP are as follows:- (i) Disallowance of provision for legal & professional charges was enhanced to Rs.1,74,48,290 instead of Rs.1

M/S.KERALA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPN,ERNAKULAM vs. THE ACIT, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 389/COCH/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Aug 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahum/S. Kerala State Warehousing Vs Acit, Corporate Circle 1(2) Corporation Is Press Road Kochi 682018 Pb No. 1727, Warehousing Corporation Road Ernakulam 682016 Pan – Aabck1583G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri K. Gopi, Ca Revenue By: Shri Shantam Bose, Cit Dr

For Appellant: Shri K. Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shantam Bose, CIT DR
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 263Section 42

40A(2)(b) reported in audit report and ITR - High Ratio of refund of TDS - Large other expenses claimed in the Profit and Loss Account. n) The Assessing officer after examining reasons for selecting the return for limited scrutiny based on the records and submissions made by the assessee accepted the return and completed the Limited scrutiny by order dated