BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

364 results for “disallowance”+ Section 250(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,629Delhi2,591Kolkata1,498Bangalore1,190Ahmedabad943Chennai910Pune648Jaipur630Chandigarh464Hyderabad449Cochin364Amritsar307Surat277Indore276Rajkot214Raipur209Visakhapatnam202Nagpur150Panaji144Lucknow131Patna118Guwahati116Cuttack92Allahabad65Jodhpur57Agra54Ranchi44Jabalpur37Calcutta35Dehradun34Karnataka18Varanasi11SC10Telangana8Rajasthan2Punjab & Haryana2Kerala2Gauhati1Himachal Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 154170Section 80P166Section 80P(2)139Section 143(3)92Section 25086Deduction63Section 80P(2)(a)54Section 80P(4)47Disallowance46Section 263

THE DCIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.SFO TECHNOLOGIES P. LTD, ALUVA

In the result, this appeal filed by Revenue in ITA

ITA 403/COCH/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Feb 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ramit Kochar, Am

For Appellant: Smt. Jamunna Devi, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Anil D. Nair& Smt. Telma
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 92C

6. The learned CIT(A) has failed to note that the Board vide Circular No.5 of 2014, has clarified that the disallowance is applicable, even in cases where no exempt income was earned during the year, but there is a possibility of earning the exempt income and the circular is not overriding the express provisions of Section 14A read with

THE DCIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.SFO TECHNOLOGIES P. LTD, ERNAKULAM

Showing 1–20 of 364 · Page 1 of 19

...
26
Addition to Income23
Natural Justice15

In the result, this appeal filed by Revenue in ITA

ITA 401/COCH/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ramit Kochar, Am

For Appellant: Smt. Jamunna Devi, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Anil D. Nair& Smt. Telma
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 92C

6. The learned CIT(A) has failed to note that the Board vide Circular No.5 of 2014, has clarified that the disallowance is applicable, even in cases where no exempt income was earned during the year, but there is a possibility of earning the exempt income and the circular is not overriding the express provisions of Section 14A read with

THE DCIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.SFO TECHNOLOGIES P. LTD, ALUVA

In the result, this appeal filed by Revenue in ITA

ITA 404/COCH/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Feb 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ramit Kochar, Am

For Appellant: Smt. Jamunna Devi, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Anil D. Nair& Smt. Telma
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 92C

6. The learned CIT(A) has failed to note that the Board vide Circular No.5 of 2014, has clarified that the disallowance is applicable, even in cases where no exempt income was earned during the year, but there is a possibility of earning the exempt income and the circular is not overriding the express provisions of Section 14A read with

THE DCIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.SFO TECHNOLOGIES P. LTD, ALUVA

In the result, this appeal filed by Revenue in ITA

ITA 402/COCH/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Feb 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ramit Kochar, Am

For Appellant: Smt. Jamunna Devi, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Anil D. Nair& Smt. Telma
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 92C

6. The learned CIT(A) has failed to note that the Board vide Circular No.5 of 2014, has clarified that the disallowance is applicable, even in cases where no exempt income was earned during the year, but there is a possibility of earning the exempt income and the circular is not overriding the express provisions of Section 14A read with

THE DCIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.SFO TECHNOLOGIES P. LTD, ALUVA

In the result, this appeal filed by Revenue in ITA

ITA 400/COCH/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ramit Kochar, Am

For Appellant: Smt. Jamunna Devi, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Anil D. Nair& Smt. Telma
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 92C

6. The learned CIT(A) has failed to note that the Board vide Circular No.5 of 2014, has clarified that the disallowance is applicable, even in cases where no exempt income was earned during the year, but there is a possibility of earning the exempt income and the circular is not overriding the express provisions of Section 14A read with

SRI. GEORGE MATHEW,COCHIN vs. THE ITO, COCHIN

In the result, appeal of the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 251/COCH/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuteam Sustain Cr Building Vs. Plot No. 71, Mra I.S. Press Rod Kakkanadu, Kochi 682030 Kochi 682018 Pan – Adwpm1819L Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Smt. Preetha S. Nair, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Shantam Bose, CIT-DR
Section 40

disallowance of Rs.1,73,32,803/ - made by the Assessing Officer u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for not effecting TDS from the expenses under the head -'Design & CAS expenses', Salary & allowances, Godown rent and professional charges. 3. The learned CIT(A) erred in considering the issue on the basis of details provided by the assessee

THE ACIT, COCHIN vs. SRI. GEORGE MATHEW, COCHIN

In the result, appeal of the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 220/COCH/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuteam Sustain Cr Building Vs. Plot No. 71, Mra I.S. Press Rod Kakkanadu, Kochi 682030 Kochi 682018 Pan – Adwpm1819L Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Smt. Preetha S. Nair, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Shantam Bose, CIT-DR
Section 40

disallowance of Rs.1,73,32,803/ - made by the Assessing Officer u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for not effecting TDS from the expenses under the head -'Design & CAS expenses', Salary & allowances, Godown rent and professional charges. 3. The learned CIT(A) erred in considering the issue on the basis of details provided by the assessee

M/S.US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal for assessment year 2011-2012

ITA 134/COCH/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 May 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Raghunathan S., AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri. Santham Bose, CIT-DR
Section 144C(5)Section 190Section 194JSection 234BSection 40Section 92C(3)

250 (including interest under section 234B of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (`the Act’) amounting to Rs.5,60,56,510); and (iii) Raising a net demand payable of Rs.20,55,69,980 upon the Appellant. Ground No.2 – Assessment and reference to Transfer Pricing Officer are bad in law. 2.1 The draft order issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income

M/S.US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE DCIT, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal for assessment year 2011-2012

ITA 475/COCH/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 May 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Raghunathan S., AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri. Santham Bose, CIT-DR
Section 144C(5)Section 190Section 194JSection 234BSection 40Section 92C(3)

250 (including interest under section 234B of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (`the Act’) amounting to Rs.5,60,56,510); and (iii) Raising a net demand payable of Rs.20,55,69,980 upon the Appellant. Ground No.2 – Assessment and reference to Transfer Pricing Officer are bad in law. 2.1 The draft order issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income

SRI.PURUSOTHAMAN K.K.,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ITO, WD-3, , THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 51/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Jun 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 36Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

250 Taxman 16) wherein it was held as under: “Section 43B, read with section 36(1)(va), of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – Business disallowance – Certain deductions to be allowed only on actual payment 4 I.T.A. No.51/Coch/2019 (PF and ESI contribution) – High Court by impugned order held that amount claimed on payment of PF and ESI having been deposited

M/S POPULAR FINANCE COMPANY,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT,CIR-1,, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 204/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)

disallowed interest paid on public deposits amounting to Rs. 7,45,07,387/-. 4.1 Therefore, the appeal under consideration is against the order under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 r.w.s. 254 dated 19.07.2013. The relevant paragraphs of the assessment order are as under: "6. From the reply furnished by the assessee and related details available in the file, it would

M/S.POPULAR FINANCE,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 203/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)

disallowed interest paid on public deposits amounting to Rs. 7,45,07,387/-. 4.1 Therefore, the appeal under consideration is against the order under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 r.w.s. 254 dated 19.07.2013. The relevant paragraphs of the assessment order are as under: "6. From the reply furnished by the assessee and related details available in the file, it would

M/S POPULAR FINANCE COMPANY,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT,CIR-1,, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 202/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)

disallowed interest paid on public deposits amounting to Rs. 7,45,07,387/-. 4.1 Therefore, the appeal under consideration is against the order under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 r.w.s. 254 dated 19.07.2013. The relevant paragraphs of the assessment order are as under: "6. From the reply furnished by the assessee and related details available in the file, it would

THE KALAKKODU SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KOLLAM vs. THE ITO, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and the stay petition filed by the assessee is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 164/COCH/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shrigeorge George K.And Shrilaxmi Prasad Sahu(Assessment Year:2018-19

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 143(1)(a)Section 250Section 32Section 36Section 61Section 80P

250. "As per Circular No. 37/2016, the board has accepted the settled position that the disallowances made under section 32, 40(a)(ia), 40A(3), 438 etc. of the Act and other specific disallowances. relatedto the business activity against which the chapter VI-A deduction has been claimed, result in enhancement of the profits of the eligible business, and that

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1, THIRUVALLA, THIRUVALLA vs. MAR GREGORIOUS MEMORIAL MUTHOOT MEDICAL CENTRE, PATHANAMTHITTA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 69/COCH/2018[2002-03]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

disallowed interest paid on public deposits amounting to Rs. 7,45,07,387/-. 4.1 Therefore, the appeal under consideration is against the order under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 r.w.s. 254 dated 19.07.2013. The relevant paragraphs of the assessment order are as under: "6. From the reply furnished by the assessee and related details available in the file, it would

DCIT, THIRUVALLA vs. MAR GREGORIOUS MEMORIAL MUTHOOT MEDICAL CENTRE, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 71/COCH/2018[2004-05]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

disallowed interest paid on public deposits amounting to Rs. 7,45,07,387/-. 4.1 Therefore, the appeal under consideration is against the order under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 r.w.s. 254 dated 19.07.2013. The relevant paragraphs of the assessment order are as under: "6. From the reply furnished by the assessee and related details available in the file, it would

DCIT, THIRUVALLA vs. MAR GREGORIOUS MEMORIAL MUTHOOT MEDICAL CENTRE, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 70/COCH/2018[2003-04]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

disallowed interest paid on public deposits amounting to Rs. 7,45,07,387/-. 4.1 Therefore, the appeal under consideration is against the order under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 r.w.s. 254 dated 19.07.2013. The relevant paragraphs of the assessment order are as under: "6. From the reply furnished by the assessee and related details available in the file, it would

DCIT, THIRUVALLA vs. MUTHOOT PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS,, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 74/COCH/2018[2003-04]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

disallowed interest paid on public deposits amounting to Rs. 7,45,07,387/-. 4.1 Therefore, the appeal under consideration is against the order under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 r.w.s. 254 dated 19.07.2013. The relevant paragraphs of the assessment order are as under: "6. From the reply furnished by the assessee and related details available in the file, it would

THE ACIT, THIRUVALLA vs. M/S.MUTHOOT PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 75/COCH/2018[2005-06]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

disallowed interest paid on public deposits amounting to Rs. 7,45,07,387/-. 4.1 Therefore, the appeal under consideration is against the order under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 r.w.s. 254 dated 19.07.2013. The relevant paragraphs of the assessment order are as under: "6. From the reply furnished by the assessee and related details available in the file, it would

DCIT, THIRUVALLA vs. MAR GREGORIOUS MEMORIAL MUTHOOT MEDICAL CENTRE, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 72/COCH/2018[2007-08]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

disallowed interest paid on public deposits amounting to Rs. 7,45,07,387/-. 4.1 Therefore, the appeal under consideration is against the order under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 r.w.s. 254 dated 19.07.2013. The relevant paragraphs of the assessment order are as under: "6. From the reply furnished by the assessee and related details available in the file, it would