THE ACIT, COCHIN vs. SRI. GEORGE MATHEW, COCHIN

In the result, appeal of the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuteam Sustain Cr Building Vs. Plot No. 71, Mra I.S. Press Rod Kakkanadu, Kochi 682030 Kochi 682018 Pan – Adwpm1819L Appellant Respondent

disallowance of Rs.1,73,32,803/ - made by the Assessing Officer u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for not effecting TDS from the expenses under the head -'Design & CAS expenses', Salary & allowances, Godown rent and professional charges. 3. The learned CIT(A) erred in considering the issue on the basis of details provided by the assessee

SRI. GEORGE MATHEW,COCHIN vs. THE ITO, COCHIN

In the result, appeal of the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuteam Sustain Cr Building Vs. Plot No. 71, Mra I.S. Press Rod Kakkanadu, Kochi 682030 Kochi 682018 Pan – Adwpm1819L Appellant Respondent

disallowance of Rs.1,73,32,803/ - made by the Assessing Officer u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for not effecting TDS from the expenses under the head -'Design & CAS expenses', Salary & allowances, Godown rent and professional charges. 3. The learned CIT(A) erred in considering the issue on the basis of details provided by the assessee

KARASSERY SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,MUKKAM vs. THE ITO WARD 2(3), KOZHIKODE

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) as below: - Sr. ITA No. AY DIN & Order No. Date No. 1 290/Coch/2023 2007-08 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 27.03.2023 23/1051368456(1) 2 291/Coch/2023 2012-13 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 28.03.2023 23/1051481740(1) 3 292/Coch/2023 2014-15 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 29.03.2023 23/1051604022(1) Cases called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceeded ex-parte

KARASSERY SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,MUKKAM vs. THE ITO WARD 2(3), KOZHIKODE

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) as below: - Sr. ITA No. AY DIN & Order No. Date No. 1 290/Coch/2023 2007-08 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 27.03.2023 23/1051368456(1) 2 291/Coch/2023 2012-13 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 28.03.2023 23/1051481740(1) 3 292/Coch/2023 2014-15 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 29.03.2023 23/1051604022(1) Cases called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceeded ex-parte

KARASSERY SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,MUKKAM vs. THE ITO WARD 2(3), KOZHIKODE

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) as below: - Sr. ITA No. AY DIN & Order No. Date No. 1 290/Coch/2023 2007-08 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 27.03.2023 23/1051368456(1) 2 291/Coch/2023 2012-13 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 28.03.2023 23/1051481740(1) 3 292/Coch/2023 2014-15 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 29.03.2023 23/1051604022(1) Cases called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceeded ex-parte

CLAPPANA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK ALTD.,KARUNAGAPPALLY vs. ITO, WARD 1&TPS, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhassessment Year: 2017-2018 M/S. Clappana Service Co-Operative The Income Tax Officer Bank Limited No.867 V. Ward 1, Alappuzha. Cp/Viii/410 & 411, Clappana Po Karunagappally, Kollam – 690 525 Pan : Aabac2747A. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Rajakannan, Advocate Respondent By : Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R. Date Of Pronouncement : 25.09.2024 Date Of Hearing : 12.08.2024 O R D E R Per Bench : This Assessee’S Appeal For A.Y. 2017-18 Arises Against The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Cit(A)]’S Din & Order No. Itba/ Nfac/S/250/2023-24/1055921666(1) Dated 11.09.2023, Passed U/S. 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act).

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused. 2. Suffice to say, we find during the course of hearing that both the learned lower authorities have disallowed the assessee’s section 80P(2) deduction claim representing its income derived from a district co-operative bank amounting to Rs.57

THE KADANAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,KOLLAPPALLY vs. ITO, NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT CENTER, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act): - Sr. ITA No. AY DIN & Order No. Date No. 1 842/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 10.10.2023 24/1056918954(1) 2 843/Coch/2023 2018-19 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 10.10.2023 24/1056919408(1) 3 844/Coch/2023 2020-21 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 10.10.2023 24/1056920417(1) The Kadanad SCB Limited. Cases called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceed

THE KADANAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,KOTTAYAM vs. ITO, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTER, DELHI, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act): - Sr. ITA No. AY DIN & Order No. Date No. 1 842/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 10.10.2023 24/1056918954(1) 2 843/Coch/2023 2018-19 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 10.10.2023 24/1056919408(1) 3 844/Coch/2023 2020-21 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 10.10.2023 24/1056920417(1) The Kadanad SCB Limited. Cases called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceed

THE KADANAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,KOTTAYAM vs. ITO, WARD-2, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act): - Sr. ITA No. AY DIN & Order No. Date No. 1 842/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 10.10.2023 24/1056918954(1) 2 843/Coch/2023 2018-19 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 10.10.2023 24/1056919408(1) 3 844/Coch/2023 2020-21 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 10.10.2023 24/1056920417(1) The Kadanad SCB Limited. Cases called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceed

KANNUR TOWN SERVICE CO-OP BANK,KANNUR vs. ITO WARD 1, KANNUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhkannur Town Service Co-Op. The Income Tax Officer-1 Bank Ltd. Aayakar Bhavan Vs. Kannur 670002 Kannothumchal [Pan: Aabak8385N] Kannur 670006 (Appellant) (Respondent)

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Heard both parties. Case file perused. 2. Suffice to say that we find during the course of hearing that both the learned lower authorities have disallowed the assessee’s section 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction. The Revenue further seeks to fortify the same on the ground that this assessee

M/S KOTTAYAM SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KANNUR vs. ITO WARD 2, KANNUR

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) . Heard both the parties. Case files perused. 2. It emerges at the outset with the able assistance coming from both the parties that the learned lower authorities have disallowed the Kottayam SCB Ltd. assessee’s sec.80P deduction claim(s) herein thereby treating it as a cooperative bank than a cooperative society

M/S KOTTAYAM SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KANNUR vs. ITO WARD 2, KANNUR

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) . Heard both the parties. Case files perused. 2. It emerges at the outset with the able assistance coming from both the parties that the learned lower authorities have disallowed the Kottayam SCB Ltd. assessee’s sec.80P deduction claim(s) herein thereby treating it as a cooperative bank than a cooperative society

THE TIRURANGADI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,TIRURANGADI vs. ITO, WARD-3, TIRUR

Appeal is allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Heard both parties. Case file perused. 2 Tirurangadi Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. 2. The assessee’s sole substantive ground raised in the instant appeal seeks to reverse both the learned lower authorities action disallowing it’s sec.80P deduction claim of Rs.43,91,161/-; in the course of assessment dated

CHEERANCHIRA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,KOTTAYAM vs. ITO, WARD 1&TPS, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhassessment Year - 2017-2018

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Heard both the parties. Case file perused. 2. Suffice to say that we find during the course of hearing that both the learned lower authorities have disallowed the assessee’s 2 Cheeranchra Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. section 80P deduction claim. The Revenue further seeks to fortify the same

RAMAPURAM NORTH AISWARYA PRADAYINI SCB LTD ,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ITO WARD 3, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhassessment Year 2017-18 Ramapuram North Aiswarya Pradayini Scb Ltd. Ramapuram North, The Income Tax Officer Vs. Keerikadu P.O., Alappuzha Ward - 3, Pin - 690508 Alappuzha Pan Aacar2023D (Appellant) (Respondent)

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). 2 Ramapuram North Aiswarya Pradayini SCB Ltd. Case called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. We accordingly proceed ex-parte against the assessee. 2. Coming to the assessee’s sole substantive ground challenging both the learned lower authorities action disallowing sec.80P deduction claim, the Revenue first of all submits that

THE KAREEPPA PANCHAYATH SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.D,KOLLAM vs. THE ITO, KOLLAM

Appeal is allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhassessment Year : 2017-18

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Heard both the parties. Case file perused. 2 Kareeppa Panchayat Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. \ 2. It emerges at the outset with the able assistance coming from both the parties that the sole substantive issue which arises for our apt adjudication is that of correctness of both the learned lower authorities

THE DCIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.SFO TECHNOLOGIES P. LTD, ALUVA

In the result, this appeal filed by Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ramit Kochar, Am

Section 14A r.w.Rule 8D and made disallowance of expenditure to the tune of Rs.1,83,55,106/- which stood added to the income of the assesse vide assessment order dated 26.03.2014 passed by AO u/s 143(3) of the 1961 Act for ay: 2010-11, the working of which is as hereunder: “4.3 Accordingly, the disallowance u/s 14A read with

THE DCIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.SFO TECHNOLOGIES P. LTD, ALUVA

In the result, this appeal filed by Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ramit Kochar, Am

Section 14A r.w.Rule 8D and made disallowance of expenditure to the tune of Rs.1,83,55,106/- which stood added to the income of the assesse vide assessment order dated 26.03.2014 passed by AO u/s 143(3) of the 1961 Act for ay: 2010-11, the working of which is as hereunder: “4.3 Accordingly, the disallowance u/s 14A read with