THE KUNDARA PANCHAYATH SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD,KOLLAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4, KOLLAM

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Keshav Dubey

disallowing the claim u/s 80P of the Act? 7. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We are of the considered opinion that the issue in dispute is squarely covered in the case Pr. CIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd.(2022) 442 ITR 141 held by Hon’ble Kerala High Court wherein

THE ADIT ( EXEMPTION), KOCHI vs. M/S.INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION COCHIN BRANCH, COCHIN

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

22,125.00 vi) Medicine Premium Collection Rs. 1,51,734.00 vii) SB Interest Rs. 4,489.00 viii) Directory Advertisement Rs. 10,000.00 ix) Income from mandap keeper (renting of halls and food) Rs. 78,55,580.00 Total Rs.1,01,97,432.00 2.1 Thus, the Assessing Officer observed that since the assessee was letting out a hall to public for conducting

THE DIT ( EXEMPTION), KOCHI vs. M/S.INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION COCHIN BRANCH, COCHIN

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

22,125.00 vi) Medicine Premium Collection Rs. 1,51,734.00 vii) SB Interest Rs. 4,489.00 viii) Directory Advertisement Rs. 10,000.00 ix) Income from mandap keeper (renting of halls and food) Rs. 78,55,580.00 Total Rs.1,01,97,432.00 2.1 Thus, the Assessing Officer observed that since the assessee was letting out a hall to public for conducting

THE DCIT, COCHIN vs. M/S.ASPINWALL & CO. LTD, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

E R Per CHANDRA POOJARI, AM: The appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos. 60& 61/Coch/2015 and 128/Coch/2017 are directed against different orders of the CIT(A) and pertain to the assessment year 2006-07 and 2012-13. The Revenue has also filed appeal in ITA No.133/Coch/2017 for the assessment year. 2. Since the issues involved in these appeals

ASPINWALL & COMPANY LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

E R Per CHANDRA POOJARI, AM: The appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos. 60& 61/Coch/2015 and 128/Coch/2017 are directed against different orders of the CIT(A) and pertain to the assessment year 2006-07 and 2012-13. The Revenue has also filed appeal in ITA No.133/Coch/2017 for the assessment year. 2. Since the issues involved in these appeals

ASPINWALL & COMPANY LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

E R Per CHANDRA POOJARI, AM: The appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos. 60& 61/Coch/2015 and 128/Coch/2017 are directed against different orders of the CIT(A) and pertain to the assessment year 2006-07 and 2012-13. The Revenue has also filed appeal in ITA No.133/Coch/2017 for the assessment year. 2. Since the issues involved in these appeals

M/S ASPINWALL & CO.,LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

E R Per CHANDRA POOJARI, AM: The appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos. 60& 61/Coch/2015 and 128/Coch/2017 are directed against different orders of the CIT(A) and pertain to the assessment year 2006-07 and 2012-13. The Revenue has also filed appeal in ITA No.133/Coch/2017 for the assessment year. 2. Since the issues involved in these appeals

VADAKKEVILA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,KOLLAM vs. THE ITO, KOLLAM

Appeal is allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

E R Per Bench : This assessee’s appeal ITA No.478/Coch/2023 for assessment year 2017-2018 arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC’s DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1052839236(1) dated 15.05.2023, in the proceedings u/s.143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act” hereinafter. Heard both the parties. Case file perused. 2. The assessee pleads following substantive grounds

KANNUR TOWN SERVICE CO-OP BANK,KANNUR vs. ITO WARD 1, KANNUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhkannur Town Service Co-Op. The Income Tax Officer-1 Bank Ltd. Aayakar Bhavan Vs. Kannur 670002 Kannothumchal [Pan: Aabak8385N] Kannur 670006 (Appellant) (Respondent)

E R Per Bench This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2014-15 arises against the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)]’s DIN & Order No. ITBA/ NFAC/S/250/2022- 23/1048024627(1) dated 15.12.2022 in proceedings u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Heard both parties. Case file perused. 2. Suffice to say that we find during the course

CLAPPANA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK ALTD.,KARUNAGAPPALLY vs. ITO, WARD 1&TPS, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhassessment Year: 2017-2018 M/S. Clappana Service Co-Operative The Income Tax Officer Bank Limited No.867 V. Ward 1, Alappuzha. Cp/Viii/410 & 411, Clappana Po Karunagappally, Kollam – 690 525 Pan : Aabac2747A. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Rajakannan, Advocate Respondent By : Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R. Date Of Pronouncement : 25.09.2024 Date Of Hearing : 12.08.2024 O R D E R Per Bench : This Assessee’S Appeal For A.Y. 2017-18 Arises Against The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Cit(A)]’S Din & Order No. Itba/ Nfac/S/250/2023-24/1055921666(1) Dated 11.09.2023, Passed U/S. 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act).

E R Per Bench : This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2017-18 arises against the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)]’s DIN & Order No. ITBA/ NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1055921666(1) dated 11.09.2023, passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused. 2. Suffice to say, we find during the course

M/S.PUTHIYANGADI SERVICE CO-OP BANK,CALICUT vs. THE ITO WARD 1(3), CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhassessment Year: 2017-18 M/S. Puthiyangadi Service Co- The Income Tax Officer Operative Bank Limited No.F1421 V. Ward 1(3), Alappuzha. Puthiyangadi Kozhikode – 673 021 Pan : Aacap0749C. (Appellant) (Respondent)

E R Per Bench : This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2017-18 arises against the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)]’s DIN & Order No. ITBA/ NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1048275081(1) dated 27.12.2022 in proceedings u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Case called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceeded ex-parte. 2. Suffice

KARASSERY SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,MUKKAM vs. THE ITO WARD 2(3), KOZHIKODE

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

E R Per Bench : These assessee’s three appeals ITA Nos.290 to 292/Coch/2023 arise against the orders of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] in proceedings u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) as below: - Sr. ITA No. AY DIN & Order No. Date No. 1 290/Coch/2023 2007-08 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 27.03.2023 23/1051368456(1) 2 291/Coch/2023

KARASSERY SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,MUKKAM vs. THE ITO WARD 2(3), KOZHIKODE

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

E R Per Bench : These assessee’s three appeals ITA Nos.290 to 292/Coch/2023 arise against the orders of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] in proceedings u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) as below: - Sr. ITA No. AY DIN & Order No. Date No. 1 290/Coch/2023 2007-08 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 27.03.2023 23/1051368456(1) 2 291/Coch/2023

KARASSERY SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,MUKKAM vs. THE ITO WARD 2(3), KOZHIKODE

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

E R Per Bench : These assessee’s three appeals ITA Nos.290 to 292/Coch/2023 arise against the orders of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] in proceedings u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) as below: - Sr. ITA No. AY DIN & Order No. Date No. 1 290/Coch/2023 2007-08 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 27.03.2023 23/1051368456(1) 2 291/Coch/2023

THE KADANAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,KOLLAPPALLY vs. ITO, NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT CENTER, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

E R Per Bench : These assessee’s three appeals arise against the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)]’s orders as below in proceedings u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act): - Sr. ITA No. AY DIN & Order No. Date No. 1 842/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 10.10.2023 24/1056918954(1) 2 843/Coch/2023 2018-19 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 10.10.2023 24/1056919408

THE KADANAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,KOTTAYAM vs. ITO, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTER, DELHI, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

E R Per Bench : These assessee’s three appeals arise against the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)]’s orders as below in proceedings u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act): - Sr. ITA No. AY DIN & Order No. Date No. 1 842/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 10.10.2023 24/1056918954(1) 2 843/Coch/2023 2018-19 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 10.10.2023 24/1056919408

THE KADANAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,KOTTAYAM vs. ITO, WARD-2, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

E R Per Bench : These assessee’s three appeals arise against the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)]’s orders as below in proceedings u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act): - Sr. ITA No. AY DIN & Order No. Date No. 1 842/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 10.10.2023 24/1056918954(1) 2 843/Coch/2023 2018-19 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 10.10.2023 24/1056919408

M/S THURAYUR SERVICE CO -OP BANK LTD,KOZHIKODE vs. THE ITO WARD 2(1), KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

E R Per Bench : These assessee’s twin appeals ITA No.195 & 196/Coch/2023, for assessment years 2014-15 & 2015-16, arise against the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)]’s as many DIN & Order Nos. ITBA/ NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1048007265(1) & 1048007182(1), both dated 14.12.2022, passed u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Cases called twice. None appears