BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

33 results for “disallowance”+ Section 198clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi759Mumbai729Kolkata251Bangalore249Ahmedabad163Chennai155Jaipur138Hyderabad99Pune78Chandigarh61Lucknow48Raipur47Surat40Calcutta34Cochin33Visakhapatnam28Indore26Rajkot24Cuttack20Karnataka16Guwahati15Nagpur10SC10Allahabad7Amritsar6Jodhpur6Jabalpur5Rajasthan4Ranchi4Varanasi4Telangana4Dehradun3Patna3Himachal Pradesh2Panaji1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 80P80Section 80P(4)40Section 80P(2)36Section 80P(2)(a)27Deduction26Section 20118Section 143(3)13Section 194H9Disallowance8Section 54E

THE ACIT, CORP CIRCLE-1(1), KOCHI, ERNAKULAM vs. APPOLO TYRES LTD, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 247/COCH/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Mar 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 80I

198 of the Companies Act, 1956, for the purpose of determining their remuneration under section 309 of that Act. Once such remuneration was fixed as provided in section 309 it was not possible to state that the assessee incurred the expenditure for the personal use of the directors. Even if there was any personal use by the directors that

THE ITO, WARD-1, KASARGODE, KSARGODE vs. M/S.MAJIBAIL SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,, KASARGODE

ITA 427/COCH/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Jan 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri George George K

Showing 1–20 of 33 · Page 1 of 2

7
Addition to Income7
Limitation/Time-bar4
For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

198 Nil 2009-10 14.02.2014 17.09.2014 6,89,724 Nil 6,89,724 6,89,724 Nil 4.2 While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Income- tax Act, for all the three years. The reasoning of the A.O. for disallowing the claim of deduction

THE ITO, WARD-1, KASARGODE, KSARGODE vs. M/S.MAJIBAIL SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,, KASARGODE

ITA 426/COCH/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Jan 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

198 Nil 2009-10 14.02.2014 17.09.2014 6,89,724 Nil 6,89,724 6,89,724 Nil 4.2 While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Income- tax Act, for all the three years. The reasoning of the A.O. for disallowing the claim of deduction

THE ITO,WARD-2, MALAPPURAM, MALAPPURAM vs. M/S.VATTIKATTIRI SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, MALAPPURAM

ITA 410/COCH/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Jan 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

198 Nil 2009-10 14.02.2014 17.09.2014 6,89,724 Nil 6,89,724 6,89,724 Nil 4.2 While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Income- tax Act, for all the three years. The reasoning of the A.O. for disallowing the claim of deduction

THE ITO, WARD-1, KASARGODE, KSARGODE vs. M/S.MAJIBAIL SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,, KASARGODE

ITA 428/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Jan 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

198 Nil 2009-10 14.02.2014 17.09.2014 6,89,724 Nil 6,89,724 6,89,724 Nil 4.2 While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Income- tax Act, for all the three years. The reasoning of the A.O. for disallowing the claim of deduction

THE ITO,WARD-2, MALAPPURAM, MALAPPURAM vs. M/S.VATTIKATTIRI SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, MALAPPURAM

ITA 411/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Jan 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

198 Nil 2009-10 14.02.2014 17.09.2014 6,89,724 Nil 6,89,724 6,89,724 Nil 4.2 While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Income- tax Act, for all the three years. The reasoning of the A.O. for disallowing the claim of deduction

THE ITO, WARD-2, TIRUR, TIRUR vs. M/S.VAZHIKADAVU SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM

ITA 413/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Jan 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

198 Nil 2009-10 14.02.2014 17.09.2014 6,89,724 Nil 6,89,724 6,89,724 Nil 4.2 While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Income- tax Act, for all the three years. The reasoning of the A.O. for disallowing the claim of deduction

THE ITO, WARD-2, TIRUR, TIRUR vs. M/S.VAZHIKADAVU SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM

ITA 412/COCH/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Jan 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

198 Nil 2009-10 14.02.2014 17.09.2014 6,89,724 Nil 6,89,724 6,89,724 Nil 4.2 While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Income- tax Act, for all the three years. The reasoning of the A.O. for disallowing the claim of deduction

THE WD-1, KASARGODE, KASARGODE vs. M/S.THE BAYAR SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, KASARGODE

ITA 429/COCH/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Jan 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

198 Nil 2009-10 14.02.2014 17.09.2014 6,89,724 Nil 6,89,724 6,89,724 Nil 4.2 While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Income- tax Act, for all the three years. The reasoning of the A.O. for disallowing the claim of deduction

THE WD-1, KASARGODE, KASARGODE vs. M/S.THE BAYAR SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, KASARGODE

ITA 430/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Jan 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

198 Nil 2009-10 14.02.2014 17.09.2014 6,89,724 Nil 6,89,724 6,89,724 Nil 4.2 While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Income- tax Act, for all the three years. The reasoning of the A.O. for disallowing the claim of deduction

THE ITO, WARD-2(3), KOZHIKKODE, KOZHIKKODE vs. M/S. KAKKAODI SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, KOZHIKKODE

ITA 526/COCH/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Jan 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

198 Nil 2009-10 14.02.2014 17.09.2014 6,89,724 Nil 6,89,724 6,89,724 Nil 4.2 While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Income- tax Act, for all the three years. The reasoning of the A.O. for disallowing the claim of deduction

THE ITO, WARD-2(3), KOZHIKKODE, KOZHIKKODE vs. M/S. KAKKAODI SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, KOZHIKKODE

ITA 525/COCH/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Jan 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

198 Nil 2009-10 14.02.2014 17.09.2014 6,89,724 Nil 6,89,724 6,89,724 Nil 4.2 While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Income- tax Act, for all the three years. The reasoning of the A.O. for disallowing the claim of deduction

THE ITO, WARD-3, KANNUR, KANNUR vs. THE PERALASSERY SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, KANNUR

ITA 561/COCH/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Jan 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

198 Nil 2009-10 14.02.2014 17.09.2014 6,89,724 Nil 6,89,724 6,89,724 Nil 4.2 While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Income- tax Act, for all the three years. The reasoning of the A.O. for disallowing the claim of deduction

THE ITO, WD-2, KANNUR, KANNUR vs. M/S.KOLAVALLOOR SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, KANNUR

ITA 567/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Jan 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

198 Nil 2009-10 14.02.2014 17.09.2014 6,89,724 Nil 6,89,724 6,89,724 Nil 4.2 While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Income- tax Act, for all the three years. The reasoning of the A.O. for disallowing the claim of deduction

THE ITO,, KANNUR vs. M/S.PATTUVAM SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, KANNUR

ITA 560/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Jan 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

198 Nil 2009-10 14.02.2014 17.09.2014 6,89,724 Nil 6,89,724 6,89,724 Nil 4.2 While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Income- tax Act, for all the three years. The reasoning of the A.O. for disallowing the claim of deduction

THEITO, WD-2, KANNUR, KANNUR vs. M/S.THE PANNIYANNUR SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, PANNIYUR, KANNUR

ITA 566/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: PendingITAT Cochin09 Jan 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

198 Nil 2009-10 14.02.2014 17.09.2014 6,89,724 Nil 6,89,724 6,89,724 Nil 4.2 While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Income- tax Act, for all the three years. The reasoning of the A.O. for disallowing the claim of deduction

THE ITO, WD-1, KASARGOD, KASARGOD vs. M/S.THE EDANAD KANNUR SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, KASARGOD

ITA 433/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Jan 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

198 Nil 2009-10 14.02.2014 17.09.2014 6,89,724 Nil 6,89,724 6,89,724 Nil 4.2 While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Income- tax Act, for all the three years. The reasoning of the A.O. for disallowing the claim of deduction

THE ITO, WARD-2(3), KOZHIKKODE, KOZHIKKODE vs. M/S. KAKKAODI SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, KOZHIKKODE

ITA 527/COCH/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Jan 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

198 Nil 2009-10 14.02.2014 17.09.2014 6,89,724 Nil 6,89,724 6,89,724 Nil 4.2 While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Income- tax Act, for all the three years. The reasoning of the A.O. for disallowing the claim of deduction

THE ITO, WD-1, KASARGOD, KASARGOD vs. M/S.THE EDANAD KANNUR SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, KASARGOD

ITA 432/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Jan 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

198 Nil 2009-10 14.02.2014 17.09.2014 6,89,724 Nil 6,89,724 6,89,724 Nil 4.2 While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Income- tax Act, for all the three years. The reasoning of the A.O. for disallowing the claim of deduction

JJ CONFECTIONERY PRIVATE LIMITED ,ERNAKULAM vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIR 1(1), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stand allowed

ITA 1018/COCH/2024[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 Jun 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav, Jm Assessment Year: 2007-08 Jj Confectionery Pvt. Ltd. .......... Appellant Viii/469-474, Kolenchery-Poothrikka Kinginimaattom, Ernakulam 682311 [Pan: Aaagj8268L] Vs. Dcit, Corporate Circle - 1(1), Kochi .......... Respondent Appellant By: Smt. Remya S. Menon, Ca Respondent By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 21.05.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 27.06.2025

For Appellant: Smt. Remya S. Menon, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 198Section 37(1)Section 40A(2)(b)

section 198 of the Companies Act. Therefore, there was no justification. 6. On the other hand, the learned Sr. DR, supporting the orders of the lower authorities submits that no interference is called for. 3 JJ Confectionery Pvt. Ltd. 7. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material available on record. The issue that arises for our consideration