BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 148Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai189Delhi73Ahmedabad67Jaipur64Kolkata50Hyderabad32Chennai30Visakhapatnam29Bangalore29Pune26Raipur16Nagpur14Surat14Chandigarh13Rajkot10Indore10Guwahati9Agra8Lucknow8Cochin4Jabalpur2Ranchi2Karnataka2Jodhpur2Cuttack1Calcutta1Patna1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 139(1)11Section 1487Section 80P7Section 545Section 148A4Deduction3Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 1472Section 10

THE VELIYANAD CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO 29,VELIYANAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CORPORATE WARD 2(1), KOCHI, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 637/COCH/2025[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Nov 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm Assessment Year: 2020-21 Veliyanad Co-Operative Society Ltd. .......... Appellant 14A, Arakunnam Veliyanad B.O. Edakkattuavyal, Ernakulam 682303 [Pan: Aacat9073F] Vs. Ito, Corporate Ward (2(1), Kochi ......... Respondent Assessee By: Shri Amaljith P.J., Ca Revenue By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 03.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 06.11.2025

For Appellant: Shri Amaljith P.J., CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 40Section 80ASection 80P

148A(d) was passed on 25.03.2024. Notice u/s. 148 was issued on 26.03.2024. In response to the notice u/s. 148, the appellant society had filed return of income for AY 2020- 21 on 26.06.2024 declaring Nil income after claiming deduction u/s. 80P of the Act at Rs. 68,70,900/-. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed

2
Section 12A2

PUSHPAGIRI MEDICAL SOCIETY,THIRUVALLA vs. ACIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURA

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 599/COCH/2022[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Jun 2023AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Aby T.Varkeypushpagiri Medical Society Asst. Cit Thiruvalla 689101 (Exemptions) Vs. Pan – Aaatp2418H Cochin

For Appellant: Shri Abraham K Thomas, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 10Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 144BSection 154Section 272B

disallowance of revenue expenditure (rs. 178.49 cr.) and addition under the head of income from other sources (rs. 80.64 lacs), aggregating to Rs.179.30 cr., inadvertently made in the computation-sheet afore- referred, credit for TDS and tax collected at source (TCS) at Rs. 167.89 lacs and Rs.1.45 lacs respectively. The non-credit of TDS and TCS, as it transpires

JOJO,THRISSUR vs. ITO WARD-1(1), THRISSUR, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 769/COCH/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am Assessment Year: 2020-21 Jojo .......... Appellant Kattalapeedika House, Mattathur, Thrissur [Pan: Bycpj5296A] Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Thrissur .......... Respondent Assessee By: Shri Vibin K.K., Ca Revenue By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 26.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 21.11.2025 O R D E R This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Cit(A)] Dated 29.08.2025 For Assessment Year (Ay) 2020-21. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That Appellant Is An Individual. No Regular Return Of Income Under The Provisions Of Section 139(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) For Ay 2020-21 Was Filed By The Appellant. Based On The Information That The Appellant Had Sold Immovable Property For A Consideration Of Rs. 20,00,000/- The Assessment Unit Of Income Tax Department (Hereinafter Called "The Ao") Formed An Opinion That Income Escaped Assessment To Tax. Accordingly, A Notice U/S. 148 Of The Act Was Issued On 28.03.2024

For Appellant: Shri Vibin K.K., CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 54

section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for AY 2020-21 was filed by the appellant. Based on the information that the appellant had sold immovable property for a consideration of Rs. 20,00,000/- the Assessment Unit of Income Tax Department (hereinafter called "the AO") formed an opinion that income escaped assessment to tax. Accordingly

HUBSPIRE,ERNAKULAM vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 781/COCH/2025[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Nov 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm Assessment Year: 2020-21 Hubspire .......... Appellant H2/2041, St. Benedict Extention Road Ernakulam North, Kochi 682018 [Pan: Aahfh3670C] Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Kochi ......... Respondent Assessee By: ------- None ------- Revenue By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 07.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 19.11.2025

For Appellant: ------- None -------For Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 148A

section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for AY 2020-21. Based on the information that the appellant was in receipt of professional fees and technical services of Rs. 22,60,000/- from Getit Communications Pvt. 2 Hubspire Ltd., the AO formed an opinion that income escaped assessment to tax. Accordingly, a notice