ARUN THOMAS,CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA, KERALA vs. INCOME TAX AUTHORITY, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI
In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed
ITA 769/COCH/2023[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2018-2019
Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.
For Appellant: Shri Suresh Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 144ASection 37Section 37(1)Section 45
disallowance represented money paid in excess of limit which was prescribed under Kerala Money lenders Act, expenditure was in teeth of Explanation to section 37(1) and was not to be allowed - Held, yes [Para 9] [In favour of revenue]"
12.0. Here, assessee is accepting deposits which is prohibited by law-section 45-
S of the RBI Act. The appellant