BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 144Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi99Mumbai76Chennai64Kolkata54Allahabad38Bangalore30Pune21Indore18Jaipur14Lucknow14Chandigarh14Ahmedabad12Surat9Patna8Rajkot8Raipur7Agra5Visakhapatnam4Hyderabad4Karnataka3Cochin3Amritsar2Jodhpur2Cuttack1Ranchi1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 37(1)8Section 374Section 452Section 144A2Deduction2Disallowance2

THE ACIT, CORP CIRCLE-1(1), KOCHI, ERNAKULAM vs. APPOLO TYRES LTD, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 247/COCH/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Mar 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 80I

disallowance of pre-operative expenditure as claimed by the assessee for setting up a new manufacturing plant at Chennai, since this expenditure is related to the erection and construction of plant and machinery and building and can be the part of the cost of plant and machinery and of building. 4. In the facts and circumstances of the case

ARUN THOMAS,CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA, KERALA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE,THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 768/COCH/2023[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024
AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 144ASection 37Section 37(1)Section 45

disallowance represented money paid in excess of limit which was prescribed under Kerala Money lenders Act, expenditure was in teeth of Explanation to section 37(1) and was not to be allowed - Held, yes [Para 9] [In favour of revenue]" 12.0. Here, assessee is accepting deposits which is prohibited by law-section 45- S of the RBI Act. The appellant

ARUN THOMAS,CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA, KERALA vs. INCOME TAX AUTHORITY, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 769/COCH/2023[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 144ASection 37Section 37(1)Section 45

disallowance represented money paid in excess of limit which was prescribed under Kerala Money lenders Act, expenditure was in teeth of Explanation to section 37(1) and was not to be allowed - Held, yes [Para 9] [In favour of revenue]" 12.0. Here, assessee is accepting deposits which is prohibited by law-section 45- S of the RBI Act. The appellant