MINA WOOD INDUSTRIES,MATTANNUR vs. ITO, W-3, KANNUR

The appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhmina Wood Industries The Income Tax Officer Iii/656 B, Kallur Ward - 3, Kannur Mattannur Vs. Kannur 670702 [Pan: Aagfm2716D] (Appellant) (Respondent)

10,000 could not be treated as violation of Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, as the KSEB is a Government Department under Kerala Government headed by a Minister. The appellant further submitted that the payments made to KSEB is covered by the exception in Rule 6DD(b) of the IT Rules and as such no disallowance

THE ACIT, ERNAKULAM vs. M/S.NITTA GELATINE INDIA LTD, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

10% relating to assets acquired and put to use in the immediate previous AY 2009-10. The Assessing Officer has rightly disallowed the same, since the plant and machinery were added during the previous year relevant to the AY 2008-09. As per clause (ii a) of sub-section (1) of section 32 provides additional depreciation only in the year

THE ACIT, COCHIN vs. M/S.NITTA GELATINE INDIA LTD, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

10% relating to assets acquired and put to use in the immediate previous AY 2009-10. The Assessing Officer has rightly disallowed the same, since the plant and machinery were added during the previous year relevant to the AY 2008-09. As per clause (ii a) of sub-section (1) of section 32 provides additional depreciation only in the year

SRI.KRISHNAN ACHARY,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ITO, WD-3,, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri George George K.

3. The solitary issue that is raised is whether the CIT(A) is justified in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer in disallowing the claim of deduction u/s. 10(10C) of the I.T. Act. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follows: The assessee is an individual. For the assessment year 2008-09, the return of income

FEDERAL BANK LTD,KOCHI vs. ACIT CORP. CIRCLE-1(1 ) , KOCHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

Section 36(1) of the Act, deduction allowable was up to 7.58 of the total income before deduction of this provision and deduction under Chapter VIA and 10% of the aggregate advances of rural branches. There is no dispute with respect to the limit of 7.58 on total income, which was assessee Bank. The Assessing Officer hence rightly computed 10

FEDERAL BANK LTD,KOCHI vs. ACIT CORP. CIRCLE-1(1 ) , KOCHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

Section 36(1) of the Act, deduction allowable was up to 7.58 of the total income before deduction of this provision and deduction under Chapter VIA and 10% of the aggregate advances of rural branches. There is no dispute with respect to the limit of 7.58 on total income, which was assessee Bank. The Assessing Officer hence rightly computed 10

FEDERAL BANK LTD,KOCHI vs. ACIT CORP. CIRCLE-1(1 ) , KOCHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

Section 36(1) of the Act, deduction allowable was up to 7.58 of the total income before deduction of this provision and deduction under Chapter VIA and 10% of the aggregate advances of rural branches. There is no dispute with respect to the limit of 7.58 on total income, which was assessee Bank. The Assessing Officer hence rightly computed 10

FEDERAL BANK LTD,KOCHI vs. ACIT CORP. CIRCLE-1(1 ) , KOCHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

Section 36(1) of the Act, deduction allowable was up to 7.58 of the total income before deduction of this provision and deduction under Chapter VIA and 10% of the aggregate advances of rural branches. There is no dispute with respect to the limit of 7.58 on total income, which was assessee Bank. The Assessing Officer hence rightly computed 10

FEDERAL BANK LTD,KOCHI vs. ACIT CORP. CIRCLE-1(1 ) , KOCHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

Section 36(1) of the Act, deduction allowable was up to 7.58 of the total income before deduction of this provision and deduction under Chapter VIA and 10% of the aggregate advances of rural branches. There is no dispute with respect to the limit of 7.58 on total income, which was assessee Bank. The Assessing Officer hence rightly computed 10

FEDERAL BANK LTD,KOCHI vs. ACIT CORP. CIRCLE-1(1 ) , KOCHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

Section 36(1) of the Act, deduction allowable was up to 7.58 of the total income before deduction of this provision and deduction under Chapter VIA and 10% of the aggregate advances of rural branches. There is no dispute with respect to the limit of 7.58 on total income, which was assessee Bank. The Assessing Officer hence rightly computed 10

THE ACIT, COCHIN vs. M/S. KANNAN DEVAN HILLS PLANTATIONS CO., P. LTD, IDUKKI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and the appeals filed

Bench: S/Shri George George K., Jm & Manjunatha G., Am

3) Computation of profit on sale of green leaves. 4) Taxation of Income from sale of import license. 5) Taxability of miscellaneous income 6) Disallowance of foreign agents commission and expense reimbursement for non deduction of tax. 14.1 In I.T.A. No.164/Coch/2017, the following issues are raised: i) Disallowance of claim under section 10

M/S.KANNAN DEVAN HILLS PLANTATIONS CO. P. LTD,MUNNAR vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and the appeals filed

Bench: S/Shri George George K., Jm & Manjunatha G., Am

3) Computation of profit on sale of green leaves. 4) Taxation of Income from sale of import license. 5) Taxability of miscellaneous income 6) Disallowance of foreign agents commission and expense reimbursement for non deduction of tax. 14.1 In I.T.A. No.164/Coch/2017, the following issues are raised: i) Disallowance of claim under section 10

M/S.KANNAN DEVAN HILLS PLANTATIONS CO. P. LTD,MUNNAR vs. THE ACIT, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and the appeals filed

Bench: S/Shri George George K., Jm & Manjunatha G., Am

3) Computation of profit on sale of green leaves. 4) Taxation of Income from sale of import license. 5) Taxability of miscellaneous income 6) Disallowance of foreign agents commission and expense reimbursement for non deduction of tax. 14.1 In I.T.A. No.164/Coch/2017, the following issues are raised: i) Disallowance of claim under section 10

M/S.KANNAN DEVAN HILLS PLANTATIONS CO. P. LTD,MUNNAR vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and the appeals filed

Bench: S/Shri George George K., Jm & Manjunatha G., Am

3) Computation of profit on sale of green leaves. 4) Taxation of Income from sale of import license. 5) Taxability of miscellaneous income 6) Disallowance of foreign agents commission and expense reimbursement for non deduction of tax. 14.1 In I.T.A. No.164/Coch/2017, the following issues are raised: i) Disallowance of claim under section 10

THE ACIT, COCHIN vs. M/S. KANNAN DEVAN HILLS PLANTATIONS CO., P. LTD, IDUKKI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and the appeals filed

Bench: S/Shri George George K., Jm & Manjunatha G., Am

3) Computation of profit on sale of green leaves. 4) Taxation of Income from sale of import license. 5) Taxability of miscellaneous income 6) Disallowance of foreign agents commission and expense reimbursement for non deduction of tax. 14.1 In I.T.A. No.164/Coch/2017, the following issues are raised: i) Disallowance of claim under section 10

ASPINWALL & COMPANY LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

disallowance of Rs.18,43,500/-. I.T.A. Nos. 60&61/Coch/2015 & 128 & 133/Coch/2017 5. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. The Ld. AR submitted that the provisions of sub-section (2) and (3) of section 14A were inserted by the Finance Act, 2006 with effect from April 1, 2007. Hence, it was submitted that the provisions of sub-section

ASPINWALL & COMPANY LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

disallowance of Rs.18,43,500/-. I.T.A. Nos. 60&61/Coch/2015 & 128 & 133/Coch/2017 5. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. The Ld. AR submitted that the provisions of sub-section (2) and (3) of section 14A were inserted by the Finance Act, 2006 with effect from April 1, 2007. Hence, it was submitted that the provisions of sub-section

M/S ASPINWALL & CO.,LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

disallowance of Rs.18,43,500/-. I.T.A. Nos. 60&61/Coch/2015 & 128 & 133/Coch/2017 5. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. The Ld. AR submitted that the provisions of sub-section (2) and (3) of section 14A were inserted by the Finance Act, 2006 with effect from April 1, 2007. Hence, it was submitted that the provisions of sub-section

THE DCIT, COCHIN vs. M/S.ASPINWALL & CO. LTD, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

disallowance of Rs.18,43,500/-. I.T.A. Nos. 60&61/Coch/2015 & 128 & 133/Coch/2017 5. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. The Ld. AR submitted that the provisions of sub-section (2) and (3) of section 14A were inserted by the Finance Act, 2006 with effect from April 1, 2007. Hence, it was submitted that the provisions of sub-section