BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

91 results for “disallowance”+ Search & Seizureclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,585Delhi2,364Chennai580Bangalore568Hyderabad502Kolkata320Jaipur319Surat187Chandigarh132Ahmedabad120Pune119Indore108Cochin91Rajkot83Nagpur66Amritsar65Visakhapatnam61Allahabad51Guwahati45Lucknow44Raipur41Cuttack33Karnataka31Patna27Jodhpur26Telangana25Ranchi23Agra17Dehradun13Kerala10Panaji6SC6Calcutta5Gauhati2Punjab & Haryana2Varanasi2Orissa2Rajasthan1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 153A117Section 250114Addition to Income34Section 13231Disallowance29Search & Seizure28Section 8019Section 143(3)17Section 142(1)16Section 153D

K.K.BUILDERS,KANNUR vs. DCIT, KOZHIKKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 234/COCH/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Pavan Ved, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 153DSection 154Section 69C

disallowed Rs. 3,43,38,880/- v) Income from sale of tenancy rights Rs. 73,93,476/- 9. Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), contesting that no addition can be made u/s. 153A of the Act in the absence of any incriminating material found as a result of search and seizure

Showing 1–20 of 91 · Page 1 of 5

14
Section 15413
Unexplained Cash Credit10

K.K BUILDERS,KANNUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, CALICUT. , CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 759/COCH/2023[AY 2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Pavan Ved, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 153DSection 154Section 69C

disallowed Rs. 3,43,38,880/- v) Income from sale of tenancy rights Rs. 73,93,476/- 9. Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), contesting that no addition can be made u/s. 153A of the Act in the absence of any incriminating material found as a result of search and seizure

REENA ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS PRIVATE LTD,PANAJI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand partly allowed statistical purposes

ITA 271/COCH/2021[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Jul 2025AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri G. Surendranath Rao, CAFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Sivanandan, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 80

disallowance cannot be made based on estimates in the absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search and seizure

REENA ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS PRIVATE LTD,PANAJI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand partly allowed statistical purposes

ITA 270/COCH/2021[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Jul 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri G. Surendranath Rao, CAFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Sivanandan, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 80

disallowance cannot be made based on estimates in the absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search and seizure

REENA ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS PRIVATE LTD,PANAJI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand partly allowed statistical purposes

ITA 268/COCH/2021[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Jul 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri G. Surendranath Rao, CAFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Sivanandan, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 80

disallowance cannot be made based on estimates in the absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search and seizure

REENA ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS PRIVATE LTD,PANAJI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand partly allowed statistical purposes

ITA 269/COCH/2021[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Jul 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri G. Surendranath Rao, CAFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Sivanandan, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 80

disallowance cannot be made based on estimates in the absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search and seizure

KK RADHAKRISHNAN,KANNUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 517/COCH/2023[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Aug 2025AY 2007-08
For Appellant: \nShri Arun Raj S, AdvocateFor Respondent: \nShri Suresh Sivanandan, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 153DSection 69C

search and seizure operations, which was confronted to the assessee and admitted. The allowance of expenditure was disallowed as per the proviso

REENA ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS PRIVATE LTD,PANAJI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

ITA 267/COCH/2021[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Jul 2025AY 2012-2013
For Appellant: \nShri G. Surendranath Rao, CAFor Respondent: \nShri Suresh Sivanandan, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 80

disallowance cannot be made based on\nestimates in the absence of any incriminating material found during\nthe course of search and seizure

KK RADHAKRISHNAN,KANNUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 518/COCH/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Aug 2025AY 2009-10
For Respondent: \nShri Arun Raj S, Advocate
Section 132Section 153ASection 153DSection 69C

seizure operation was conducted on the assessee's business premises, revealing unaccounted income from a BOT construction and sale of Indian-made foreign liquor (IMFL). Notices under section 153A of the Income Tax Act were issued, and assessment was completed with additions for unexplained expenditure and personal expenses.", "held": "The tribunal held that the JCIT's approval under section 153D

TRIVANDRUM CABLE NETWORK(P) LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE -1, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 693/COCH/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Feb 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: --- None ---For Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153A

search and seizure certain incriminating materials were stated to have been found and seized. Based on the incriminating material, the assessee was issued notice u/s.153A of the Act on 28th March, 2012. However, the assessee neither complied with the notice issued u/s.153A of the Act nor filed any information as called for vide notice issued u/s.142

TRIVANDRUM CABLE NETWORK (P) LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE -1, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 692/COCH/2024[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Feb 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: --- None ---For Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153A

search and seizure certain incriminating materials were stated to have been found and seized. Based on the incriminating material, the assessee was issued notice u/s.153A of the Act on 28th March, 2012. However, the assessee neither complied with the notice issued u/s.153A of the Act nor filed any information as called for vide notice issued u/s.142

TRIVANDRUM CABLE NETWORK (P) LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 689/COCH/2024[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Feb 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: --- None ---For Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153A

search and seizure certain incriminating materials were stated to have been found and seized. Based on the incriminating material, the assessee was issued notice u/s.153A of the Act on 28th March, 2012. However, the assessee neither complied with the notice issued u/s.153A of the Act nor filed any information as called for vide notice issued u/s.142

TRIVANDRUM CABLE NETWORK (P) LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 691/COCH/2024[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Feb 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: --- None ---For Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153A

search and seizure certain incriminating materials were stated to have been found and seized. Based on the incriminating material, the assessee was issued notice u/s.153A of the Act on 28th March, 2012. However, the assessee neither complied with the notice issued u/s.153A of the Act nor filed any information as called for vide notice issued u/s.142

TRIVANDRUM CABLE NETWORK (P) LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 694/COCH/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Feb 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: --- None ---For Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153A

search and seizure certain incriminating materials were stated to have been found and seized. Based on the incriminating material, the assessee was issued notice u/s.153A of the Act on 28th March, 2012. However, the assessee neither complied with the notice issued u/s.153A of the Act nor filed any information as called for vide notice issued u/s.142

TRIVANDRUM CABLE NETWORK (P) LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 690/COCH/2024[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Feb 2025AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: --- None ---For Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153A

search and seizure certain incriminating materials were stated to have been found and seized. Based on the incriminating material, the assessee was issued notice u/s.153A of the Act on 28th March, 2012. However, the assessee neither complied with the notice issued u/s.153A of the Act nor filed any information as called for vide notice issued u/s.142

SANTHIMADAM AGROFARM TRUST,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 223/COCH/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Aug 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ilaiyaraja K.S., Sr. DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153CSection 194CSection 234ASection 40Section 68Section 69

search warranting the disallowance and that without such a seizure no disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) can be made in a search

SANTHIMADAM AGROFARM TRUST,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 220/COCH/2023[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Aug 2024AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ilaiyaraja K.S., Sr. DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153CSection 194CSection 234ASection 40Section 68Section 69

search warranting the disallowance and that without such a seizure no disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) can be made in a search

SANTHIMADAM AGROFARM TRUST,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 221/COCH/2023[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Aug 2024AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ilaiyaraja K.S., Sr. DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153CSection 194CSection 234ASection 40Section 68Section 69

search warranting the disallowance and that without such a seizure no disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) can be made in a search

SANTHIMADAM AGROFARM TRUST,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 222/COCH/2023[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Aug 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ilaiyaraja K.S., Sr. DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153CSection 194CSection 234ASection 40Section 68Section 69

search warranting the disallowance and that without such a seizure no disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) can be made in a search

K.K.BUILDERS,KANNUR vs. DCIT, KOZHIKKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 235/COCH/2023[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Aug 2025AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Arun Raj S, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Sivanandan, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153D

search and seizure operations, certain incriminating material was stated to have been found and seized. According to the Assessing Officer (for short, ‘AO’) the incriminating material, so seized, revealed that assessee had earned huge unaccounted income from its business of sale and purchase of Indian made foreign liquor (IMFL) and also income from Kannnur Municipal bus-stand under BOT arrangement