PANICHIKANDY MOHANDASAN,KASARGOD vs. THE DCIT, KANNUR
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed
ITA 48/COCH/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Mar 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Soundararajan K., Jm Assessment Year: 2016-17 Panichikandy Mohandasan .......... Appellant Kanhangad, Hosdurg, Kasaragod 671315 [Pan: Advpm0383N] Vs. Dy Commissioner Of Income Tax .......... Respondent Kannur Appellant By: Shri Arun Raj S., Advocate Respondent By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 10.03.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 20.03.2025
For Appellant: Shri Arun Raj S., AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)
disallowance of loss under house property income. The AO merely disallowed the loss claimed under the head ‘house property’ by holding
