BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

114 results for “disallowance”+ Deemed Dividendclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,008Delhi472Chennai172Bangalore144Ahmedabad123Cochin114Kolkata113Pune87Hyderabad77Chandigarh75Jaipur75Raipur58Lucknow31Nagpur24Indore23SC22Surat18Guwahati11Visakhapatnam9Rajkot8Panaji7Jabalpur5Cuttack4Jodhpur3Agra3Amritsar2Dehradun2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Ranchi1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 250130Section 80P87Section 5659Deduction40Section 143(3)30Section 32(1)(iia)30Section 80P(2)25Section 219Section 2219Disallowance

THE DCIT, CIRCLE 1(1), TRIVANDRUM vs. M/S KERALA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD, TRIVANDRUM

Appeal is allowed

ITA 272/COCH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: --- None ---For Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 135Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 80G

disallowance u/s 14A of the Act had again restored the issue to the file of the AO with the direction to ascertain the investment which have yielded dividend income and to consider only those investments for computing the average value of investments Therefore, on identical facts and with consent of both the parties, we deem

Showing 1–20 of 114 · Page 1 of 6

16
Addition to Income16
Depreciation6

BHIMA JEWELLERS AND DIAMONDS,ATTINGAL vs. THE ADDITIONAL OR JOINT OR DEPUTY OR ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 623/COCH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Oct 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan Kassessment Years : 2018-19 The Asst. Commissioner Of Bhima Jewellers & Diamonds, Vs. M M Hall Lms Junction, Attingal, Income Tax, Trivandrum – 695 101. Circle – 1(1), Trivandrum. Pan – Aamfb 3260 F The Addl/Joint/Dy./Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nfac, Delhi. Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri R Krishnan, Ca Revenue By : Smt. Giriy Albert, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 19.09.2024 Dateof Pronouncement : 15.10.2024 O R D E R Per Waseem Ahmed:

For Appellant: Shri R Krishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt. GirIy Albert, Sr. DR

deemed required and recompute the disallowance of interest expenses afresh and disallow the same as discussed above. Thus, ground nos. 6 to 13 are treated as partly allowed subject to the recomputation of the AO. 5. Being aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before us. 6. The ld. AR before us contended

THE ACIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.COCHIN SHIPYARD LTD, KOCHI

In the result, all the appeals by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 655/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr. ARFor Respondent: S/Shri Rajasekharan & K. Gopi, CAs
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(1)(ii)Section 32(1)(iia)Section 40

deemed to be ITA Nos.655 to 659/Coch/2019 Page 7 of 10 income which have either accrued or arisen in India. A similar view is held by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Eon Technology P. Ltd., [2011] 15 taxmann.com 391. 13. In view of this discussion and considering the facts of the present case

THE ACIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.COCHIN SHIPYARD LTD, KOCHI

In the result, all the appeals by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 657/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr. ARFor Respondent: S/Shri Rajasekharan & K. Gopi, CAs
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(1)(ii)Section 32(1)(iia)Section 40

deemed to be ITA Nos.655 to 659/Coch/2019 Page 7 of 10 income which have either accrued or arisen in India. A similar view is held by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Eon Technology P. Ltd., [2011] 15 taxmann.com 391. 13. In view of this discussion and considering the facts of the present case

THE ACIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.COCHIN SHIPYARD LTD, KOCHI

In the result, all the appeals by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 656/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr. ARFor Respondent: S/Shri Rajasekharan & K. Gopi, CAs
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(1)(ii)Section 32(1)(iia)Section 40

deemed to be ITA Nos.655 to 659/Coch/2019 Page 7 of 10 income which have either accrued or arisen in India. A similar view is held by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Eon Technology P. Ltd., [2011] 15 taxmann.com 391. 13. In view of this discussion and considering the facts of the present case

THE ACIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.COCHIN SHIPYARD LTD, KOCHI

In the result, all the appeals by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 658/COCH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr. ARFor Respondent: S/Shri Rajasekharan & K. Gopi, CAs
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(1)(ii)Section 32(1)(iia)Section 40

deemed to be ITA Nos.655 to 659/Coch/2019 Page 7 of 10 income which have either accrued or arisen in India. A similar view is held by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Eon Technology P. Ltd., [2011] 15 taxmann.com 391. 13. In view of this discussion and considering the facts of the present case

THE ACIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.COCHIN SHIPYARD LTD, KOCHI

In the result, all the appeals by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 659/COCH/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr. ARFor Respondent: S/Shri Rajasekharan & K. Gopi, CAs
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(1)(ii)Section 32(1)(iia)Section 40

deemed to be ITA Nos.655 to 659/Coch/2019 Page 7 of 10 income which have either accrued or arisen in India. A similar view is held by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Eon Technology P. Ltd., [2011] 15 taxmann.com 391. 13. In view of this discussion and considering the facts of the present case

THE DCIT, COCHIN vs. M/S.COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD, COCHIN

ITA 167/COCH/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Oct 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Respondent: 22.08.2024
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 80I

dividends (which do not exist) from investments (that have not been made during the impugned financial year) Cochin International Airport Ltd. and that such imagined expenses have not been attributed and/or disallowed by it. He has not specifically shown with the support of evidences that any such incurrence or consequent non-attribution has taken place. There is hence no cogent

THE DCIT, COCHIN vs. M/S.COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD, COCHIN

ITA 166/COCH/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Oct 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Respondent: 22.08.2024
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 80I

dividends (which do not exist) from investments (that have not been made during the impugned financial year) Cochin International Airport Ltd. and that such imagined expenses have not been attributed and/or disallowed by it. He has not specifically shown with the support of evidences that any such incurrence or consequent non-attribution has taken place. There is hence no cogent

THEDCIT, COCHIN vs. M.S COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD, COCHIN

ITA 304/COCH/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Oct 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Respondent: 22.08.2024
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 80I

dividends (which do not exist) from investments (that have not been made during the impugned financial year) Cochin International Airport Ltd. and that such imagined expenses have not been attributed and/or disallowed by it. He has not specifically shown with the support of evidences that any such incurrence or consequent non-attribution has taken place. There is hence no cogent

THE DCIT, COCHIN vs. M.S COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD, COCHIN

ITA 193/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Oct 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Respondent: 22.08.2024
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 80I

dividends (which do not exist) from investments (that have not been made during the impugned financial year) Cochin International Airport Ltd. and that such imagined expenses have not been attributed and/or disallowed by it. He has not specifically shown with the support of evidences that any such incurrence or consequent non-attribution has taken place. There is hence no cogent

APTIV CONNECTION SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KOCHI, KERALA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), KOCHI, KERALA

ITA 736/COCH/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

dividend income received of Rs.17,33,532/-. Aptiv Connection Systems India P. Ltd. 5. "Lease principal repayment" of Rs.22,95,833/- has been claimed as deduction in the computation of income details of which has not been declared by the assessee in the return. In view of the above, It is clear that the assessee had not fully and truly

APTIV CONNECTION SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KOCHI, KERALA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), KOCHI, ERNAKULAM, KERALA

ITA 735/COCH/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Oct 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

dividend income received of Rs.17,33,532/-. Aptiv Connection Systems India P. Ltd. 5. "Lease principal repayment" of Rs.22,95,833/- has been claimed as deduction in the computation of income details of which has not been declared by the assessee in the return. In view of the above, It is clear that the assessee had not fully and truly

APTIV CONNECTION SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KOCHI, KERALA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), ERNAKULAM, KERALA

ITA 749/COCH/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Oct 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

dividend income received of Rs.17,33,532/-. Aptiv Connection Systems India P. Ltd. 5. "Lease principal repayment" of Rs.22,95,833/- has been claimed as deduction in the computation of income details of which has not been declared by the assessee in the return. In view of the above, It is clear that the assessee had not fully and truly

THE TRIVANDRUM EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO. 43,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ADDITIONAL JOINT DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOCHI

ITA 792/COCH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, CA
Section 115BSection 144BSection 250Section 40A(3)Section 68Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

dividend derived by the assessee from its investments with any other Co- operative Society. The source of interest income is from Bank and The Trivandrum Employees Co-operative Society Ltd. Treasury, interest income received from Treasury be included in the computation of total income of the assessee. In other words, interest earned from Treasury is inadmissible for deduction and interest

THE TRIVANDRUM EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO. 43,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

ITA 863/COCH/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, CA
Section 115BSection 144BSection 250Section 40A(3)Section 68Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(d)

dividend derived by the assessee from its investments with any other Co- operative Society. The source of interest income is from Bank and The Trivandrum Employees Co-operative Society Ltd. Treasury, interest income received from Treasury be included in the computation of total income of the assessee. In other words, interest earned from Treasury is inadmissible for deduction and interest

RUCHIT PARIMAL ASHAR,SANALA ROAD, MORBI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 506/COCH/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

dividend, zakath etc., stated to be received from the said company during the year, is liable to tax in India in the hands of the appellant, under the so called 'global income' theory . The CIT (A) grossly ignored the provisions of the law , when upholding the findings of the assessing officer in this regard. Moreover, investments of any amount, having

RUCHIT PARIMAL ASHAR,SANALA ROAD, MORBI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 505/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

dividend, zakath etc., stated to be received from the said company during the year, is liable to tax in India in the hands of the appellant, under the so called 'global income' theory . The CIT (A) grossly ignored the provisions of the law , when upholding the findings of the assessing officer in this regard. Moreover, investments of any amount, having

ABC SALES CORPORATION,KASARAGOD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 439/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

dividend, zakath etc., stated to be received from the said company during the year, is liable to tax in India in the hands of the appellant, under the so called 'global income' theory . The CIT (A) grossly ignored the provisions of the law , when upholding the findings of the assessing officer in this regard. Moreover, investments of any amount, having

A B C SALES CORPORATION ,KANNUR vs. ITO, CIRCLE-1, KANNUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 404/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

dividend, zakath etc., stated to be received from the said company during the year, is liable to tax in India in the hands of the appellant, under the so called 'global income' theory . The CIT (A) grossly ignored the provisions of the law , when upholding the findings of the assessing officer in this regard. Moreover, investments of any amount, having