BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,400 results for “disallowance”+ Deductionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai15,338Delhi11,450Chennai5,168Bangalore4,918Kolkata4,451Ahmedabad3,164Pune3,148Hyderabad2,028Jaipur1,670Cochin1,400Chandigarh1,067Indore961Surat822Visakhapatnam717Raipur589Karnataka574Cuttack558Rajkot511Nagpur473Amritsar451Lucknow353Panaji293Jodhpur216Agra208Ranchi177Guwahati175Telangana168SC123Dehradun123Patna116Jabalpur100Calcutta92Allahabad91Kerala68Varanasi51Punjab & Haryana30Orissa11Rajasthan7Himachal Pradesh7A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN5H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Gauhati1J&K1Tripura1Uttarakhand1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1

Key Topics

Section 80P155Deduction77Section 143(3)56Disallowance50Section 80P(2)43Section 10B43Section 80P(2)(a)36Section 4032Section 25028Addition to Income

M/S.APOLLO TYRES LTD,COCHIN vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 609/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm Assessment Year: 2013-14 Apollo Tyres Ltd. .......... Appellant 3Rd Floor, Areekal Mansion, Panampilly Nagar, Kochi 682036 [Pan: Aaaca6990Q] Vs. Dcit, Corporate Circle-1(1), Kochi ......... Respondent Assessee By: Shri Abraham Joseph Markos, Adv. Revenue By: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 20.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 01.09.2025

For Appellant: Shri Abraham Joseph Markos, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 32Section 32(1)(iia)Section 35Section 43(1)Section 92C

Disallowance of excess claim of deduction u/s. 35(2AB) – The appellant company made claim for deduction of Rs. 80,28,91.589/- u/s. 35(2AB) of the Act as against

Showing 1–20 of 1,400 · Page 1 of 70

...
28
Section 26320
TDS10

M/S. KANCHIYAR SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,IDUKKI vs. THE ITO,, THODUPUZHA

ITA 196/COCH/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri.Mritunjaya Sharma, Sr.DR
Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the I.T.Act. The reasoning of the Assessing Officer to disallow the claim

M/S. ALAKODE SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,IDUKKI vs. THE ITO, THODUPUZHA

ITA 194/COCH/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri.Mritunjaya Sharma, Sr.DR
Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the I.T.Act. The reasoning of the Assessing Officer to disallow the claim

M/S. ALAKODE SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,IDUKKI vs. THE ITO, THODUPUZHA

ITA 195/COCH/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri.Mritunjaya Sharma, Sr.DR
Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the I.T.Act. The reasoning of the Assessing Officer to disallow the claim

KARIMKUNNAM SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,THODUPUZHA vs. THE ITO, THODUPUZHA

ITA 121/COCH/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Jun 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Arun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Mritunjaya Sharma, Sr.DR
Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the I.T.Act. The reasoning of the Assessing Officer to disallow the claim

KARIMKUNNAM SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,THODUPUZHA vs. THE ITO, THODUPUZHA

ITA 122/COCH/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Jun 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Arun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Mritunjaya Sharma, Sr.DR
Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the I.T.Act. The reasoning of the Assessing Officer to disallow the claim

M/S UPPUTHARA SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,IDUKKI vs. THE ITO, THODUPUZHA

ITA 197/COCH/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Jul 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George George K

For Appellant: Sri.Arun Raj SFor Respondent: Sri.Mritunjaya Sharma, Sr.DR
Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

deduction u/s 80P of the I.T.Act. 4. Aggrieved by the order passed by the Assessing Officer disallowing the claim of deduction

UZHAVA SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ITO, WD-4, ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA

ITA 654/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari

For Appellant: Smt.Swathy S., AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

disallowing the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the I.T.Act. The reasoning of the Assessing Officer to disallow the claim

ARTHUNKAL VILLAGE SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ITO,, ALAPPUZHA

ITA 714/COCH/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Jan 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Smt.Swathy S., AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Mrithunjaya Sharma, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

disallowing the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the I.T.Act. The reasoning of the Assessing Officer to disallow the claim

THE NADAKKAL SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KOLLAM vs. THE ITO, WD-4,, KOLLAM

ITA 660/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Jan 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Smt.Swathy S., AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Mrithunjaya Sharma, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

disallowing the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the I.T.Act. The reasoning of the Assessing Officer to disallow the claim

SL PURAM SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ITO,, ALAPPUZHA

ITA 652/COCH/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Jan 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.C.A.JojoFor Respondent: Sri.Mrithunjaya Sharma, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

disallowing the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the I.T.Act. The reasoning of the Assessing Officer to disallow the claim

KOLLAD SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KOTTAYAM vs. ITO WARD 2 , KOTTAYAM

In the result, all the appealsare allowed

ITA 95/COCH/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Accountantmemberand Shri Manomohan Das, Judicialmember

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 142Section 143(1)(a)Section 80Section 80ASection 80P

disallowance of deduction claimed under sections 10AA, 80-IA, 80-IAB, 80-IB, 80- IC, 80-ID or section 80-IE, if the return

M/S OLAVANNA SERVICE CO-OP BANK,KOZHIKODE vs. THE ITO WARD 2(3), KOZHIKODE

In the result, all the appealsare allowed

ITA 47/COCH/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Accountantmemberand Shri Manomohan Das, Judicialmember

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 142Section 143(1)(a)Section 80Section 80ASection 80P

disallowance of deduction claimed under sections 10AA, 80-IA, 80-IAB, 80-IB, 80- IC, 80-ID or section 80-IE, if the return

THACHANATTUKARA FARMERS PRODUCERS COMPANY,PALAKKAD vs. ITO WARD 1, PALAKKAD

In the result, all the appealsare allowed

ITA 995/COCH/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Accountantmemberand Shri Manomohan Das, Judicialmember

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 142Section 143(1)(a)Section 80Section 80ASection 80P

disallowance of deduction claimed under sections 10AA, 80-IA, 80-IAB, 80-IB, 80- IC, 80-ID or section 80-IE, if the return

ENADIMANGALAM SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ITO, KOLLAM

ITA 149/COCH/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Oct 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George Mathan, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.O.D.Sivadas, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.B.Sajjive, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the I.T.Act. The reasoning of the Assessing Officer to disallow the claim

M/S.KERALA STATE CO-OP AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEV BANK LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO WD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 566/COCH/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Feb 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Jose JacobFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 37Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

deduction u/s 80P of the I.T.Act amounting to Rs.81,55,90,334. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of deduction

M/S.KERALA STATE CO-OP AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEV BANK LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO WD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 567/COCH/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Feb 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Jose JacobFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 37Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

deduction u/s 80P of the I.T.Act amounting to Rs.81,55,90,334. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of deduction

THE KALAKKODU SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KOLLAM vs. THE ITO, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and the stay petition filed by the assessee is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 164/COCH/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shrigeorge George K.And Shrilaxmi Prasad Sahu(Assessment Year:2018-19

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 143(1)(a)Section 250Section 32Section 36Section 61Section 80P

deduction under chapter VI-A is admissible on the profits so enhanced by the disallowance". So our deduction ulsBOP will

AVINISSERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,THRISSUR vs. ITO, WARD 2(1),THRISSUR, THRISSUR

ITA 556/COCH/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Alan P DevFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. AR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 5Section 80Section 80P

disallowing the deduction under Section 80P. 7. That the Ld. AO has primarily disallowed deduction by taking in to the proportion

SUD CHEMIE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,ERNAKULAM vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIR 2(1),KOCHI, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 990/COCH/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George George K., Vp & Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am

For Appellant: Shri Radesh Bhatt, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 35

disallowance claim for deduction u/s. 35(2AB) of the Act of Rs. 19,74,30,996/- and the disallowance of subscription